Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

The Problem of Will in the Discourse of Humanitarian Culture

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2026-12-2-32-48

Abstract

Introduction. The article explores the dialectic of the phenomenon of will and its interpretation in modern scientific discourse. Will is considered in the philosophical aspect as the ability of a person to meaningfully make a choice and strictly follow it, building a scenario of their behavior. The research hypothesis is that will is a complex and internally structured phenomenon (a system of predicates) of human behavior, determined by specific internal and external factors. Based on a system analysis, the correlation of the phenomenon of will and freedom, consciousness, love, fear, courage, education is determined in the context of a holistic philosophical reconstruction of this phenomenon.

Methodology and sources. The problem of will has several aspects and is considered in science as a philosophical, pedagogical and psychological phenomenon. The research methodology is based on the method of dialectics and the use of induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, ascent from the abstract to the concrete. Philosophical concepts of Aristotle, N.A. Berdyaev, I.A. Ilyin, I. Kant, K. Marx, V.S. Solovyov, A. Schopenhauer and others are used in the philosophical analysis of the phenomenon of will.

Results and discussion. The article provides a justification of the phenomenon of will as a special spiritual tension of personality (the power of the human spirit), which appears (or is formed) in a person in a situation of choice, when they have to make certain decisions, develop a certain scenario of their behavior and bear personal responsibility for them. In the complex structure of the phenomenon of will, a certain hierarchy of its system-forming elements is revealed, its ontological, axiological and epistemological foundations are revealed.

Conclusion. In conclusion, it is concluded that to cultivate the will in oneself means to form in oneself such spiritual principles that have absolute meaning, objective truth and determine for a person the fullness of his being.

About the Authors

D. K. Stozhko
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Dmitry K. Stozhko - Can. Sci. (Philosophy, 2012), Docent (2018), Associate Professor at the Department of Creative Management and Humanities 

8 Marta str., 62, Ekaterinburg 620144 



N. Yu. Stozhko
Ural State University of Economics
Russian Federation

Natalia Yu. Stozhko - Dr. Sci. (Chemistry, 2006), Professor (2009), Head of the Department of Physics and Chemistry 

8 Marta str., 62, Ekaterinburg 620144 



References

1. Al'pindovskaya, M.L. (2021), Zapiski o novoi real'nosti: postizhenie global'ny smyslov [Notes on a new reality: comprehension of global meanings], Prometei, Moscow, RUS.

2. Rudnev, V.P. (2016), Novaya model' real'nosti [A new model of reality], ID HSE, Moscow, RUS.

3. Khiluta, V.V. (2022), “Human and the New Reality: What Will be the Choice?”, Filosofiya prava, no. 4, pp. 94–99.

4. Ἀριστοτέλης (2010), “Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια“, Ehtika [Ethics], Transl. by AST, Moscow, RUS, pp. 39–280.

5. Πλάτων (1990), Κρατύλος. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works], Transl. by Solov'eva, V.S., Solov'eva, M.S., Sheinman-Topshtein, S.Ya. et al., in 4 vols., vol. 1, Mysl', Moscow, USSR, pp. 39–280.

6. Cicero, M.T. (1975), “Tusculanae disputationes”, Izbrannye sochineniya [Selected works], Transl. by Gasparov, M., Khudozh. lit., Moscow, USSR, pp. 207–257.

7. Smirnov, I. and Levinskii, V. (comp.) (1999), Krylatye frazy drevnikh rimlyan [Catch phrases of the ancient Romans], Ripol Klassik, Moscow, RUS.

8. Fichte, J.G. (1993), “Die Wissenschaftslehre in ihrem allgemeinen Umrisse“, Werke, Transl., comp. V. Volzhskii, in 2 vols., vol. 2, Mifril, SPb., RUS, pp. 772–789.

9. Balyazin, V. (2006), Mudrost' tysyacheletii. Ehntsiklopediya [The Wisdom of millennia. Encyclopedia], OLMA PRESS, Moscow, RUS.

10. Baidakova, M.Yu. (2009), “The problem of free will in the western philosophy and the Christian western tradition”, Bulletin of Moscow Region State Univ. Ser. Philosophy, no. 3, pp. 11–15.

11. Vodolagin, A.V. (2012), Metafizika voli. Volyuntaristskaya traditsiya v istorii zapadnoi filosofii [Metaphysics of will. The Voluntarist tradition in the History of Western Philosophy], Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, RUS.

12. D'yachenko, O.N. (2012), “Problem of freedom of will in west European medieval philosophy”, Historical, philosophical, political and law sciences, culturology and study of art. Issues of theory and practice, no. 3–1 (77), pp. 66–68.

13. Shevtsov, A.A. (2017), Ocherk russkoi filosofskoi antropologii voli [An essay on the Russian Philosophical Anthropology of the Will], Roshcha, SPb., RUS.

14. Skliarova, T.V. (2005), “The will in pedagogics, psychology and theology. Age crisis as the main points of will-development”, St. Tikhon’s University Review. Pedagogy. Psychology, no. 1, pp. 114–133.

15. Нunt, M. (2009), The Story of Psychology, Transl. by Aleksandrova, A.V., AST, Moscow, RUS.

16. Kefeli, I.F. (2020), Asphatronics. On the Way to the Global Security Theory, IPCz Institute of Management RANEPA, SPb., RUS.

17. Bogdanov, A.A. (2003), Ehmpiriomonizm [Empiriomonism], Respublika, Moscow, RUS.

18. Stozhko, D.K., Stozhko, K.P. (2023), “Humanistic Views of A. A. Bogdanov: Relations of Cooperation and the Problem of “Gathering a Person” (to the 150th Anniversary of the Birth of a Scientist)”, Russian J. of the Humanities, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 311–323. DOI: 10.15507/2078-9823.063.023. 202303.311-323

19. Ostwald, W.F. (1903), Naturphilosophie, Transl. by Davydova, O.A., Tip. Brokgauz-Efron, SPb., RUS.

20. Podolinskii, S.A. (1991), Trud cheloveka i ego otnoshenie k raspredeleniyu ehnergii [Human labor and its relation to energy distribution], Noosfer, Moscow, RUS.

21. Ivannikov, V.A. (2006), Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy volevoi regulyatsii ehnergii [Psychological mechanisms of volitional regulation], Piter, SPb., RUS.

22. Il'in, E.P. (2009), Psikhologiya voli ehnergii [Psychology of will], Piter, SPb., RUS.

23. Smirnova, O.Yu. and Serkin, V.P. (2018), “The basic interpretations of volition in the framework of the energetic approach“, Bulletin of Kemerovo State Univ., no. 4, pp. 165–174. DOI: 10.21603/2078-8975-2018-4-165-174

24. Batyrshina, A.R. (2023), “The idea of the human will before the emergence of psychology as a science”, Humanization of Education, no. 4, pp. 30–40. DOI: 10.24412/1029-3388-2023-4-30-40

25. Savostyanov, A.N., Stepanova, V.V. and Tolstykh, N.N. (2019), “Will and Self-Regulation: An Interdisciplinary Research Experience”, Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 91–104. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2019150310

26. Mikhal'kova, E.I. and Radchenko, S.A. (2023), “The will of the individual in modern psychology“, Young Scientist, no. 33 (480), pp. 95–104.

27. Alenevsky, I.A. (2017), “Philosophical theses about the will”, Belgorod State Univ. Scientific Bulletin. Ser. Philosophy. Sociology. Law, no. 24 (273), pp. 170–174.

28. Garntseva, N.M. (2012), “Discussing the problem of free will: B. Libet, D. Wegner and D. Dennett”, Filosofiya. Yazyk. Kul'tura [Philosophy. Language. Culture], Gorbatov, V.V. (ed.), Aleteiya, SPb., RUS, pp. 155–165.

29. Schopenhauer, A. (2011), Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Transl. by Aikhenval'd, Yu., Chernigovets, F. and Kresin, R., Kharvest, Minsk, BLR.

30. Markov, Yu.E. (2007), “The human crisis as a reflection of global human problems“, Vestnik Chuvashskogo Universiteta, no. 3, pp. 104–108.

31. Skolyar, Yu.N. (2015), “Study of the phenomenon of free will in the existential philosophy”, Bulletin of the Moscow State Forests Univ. Forestry Bulletin, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 163–168.

32. Il'in, I.A. (1998), Put' k ochevidnosti [The Path to evidence], EHKSMO-PRESS, Moscow, RUS.

33. Bozhko, N.O. and Kravtsova, V.S. (2017), “Aborty v Rossii: ‘za’ i ‘protiv’”, Evraziiskii nauchnyi zhurnal, no. 2, pp.177–179.

34. Drozdova, E.A. and Aksenova, A.V. (2018), “Suicide in the criminal law and its social conditionality”, Gaps in Russian legislation, no. 3, pp. 325–327.

35. Holm, S. and Lewis, D. (2024), “Aborty: argumenty` pro et contra”, Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity, vol 9, no. 2, pp. 120–131. DOI: 10.25206/2542-0488-2024-9-2-120-131

36. Shapovalova, V.I. and Davydov, R.Kh. (2017), “The problem of the legalization of euthanasia in Russian and foreign law”, Economy. Law. Society, no. 3 (11), pp.111–117.

37. Batyrshina, A.R. (2017), Psikhologiya voli i volevaya regulyatsiya: bibliograficheskii ukazatel' literatury [Psychology of will and volitional regulation: a bibliographic index of literature], FLINTA, Moscow, RUS.

38. Assagioli, R. (2016), Psychosynthesis: A Manual of Principles and Techniques, Transl., In-t obshchegumanitarnykh issled., Moscow, RUS.

39. Baumeister, R. and Tierny, Jo. (2023), Willpower. Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, Transl. by Bogdanov, S., Bombora, Moscow, RUS.

40. MacGonigal, K. (2022), The Willpower Instinct How Self-Control Works, Why It Matters, and What You Can Do to Get More of It, Transl. by Chistopol'skaya, K., Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, RUS.

41. Mischel, W. (2014), The Marshmallow Test Mastering Self-Control, Transl. by Kuzin, V., Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, RUS.

42. Abramov, B.N. (2021), Volya i ee vospitanie: iz zapisei B. N. Abramova [Volya and her upbringing: from the Notes of B. N. Abramov], Pertseva, T.L. (comp.), Sibirskoe Rerikhovskoe obshchestvo, Novosibirsk, RUS.

43. Maltseva, E.V. (2019), ““K. D. Ushinsky about "free will" and its education (on the basis of materials to the third volume of “pedagogical anthropology”)”, Istoriko-pedagogicheskii zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 171–177.

44. Chumakov, M.V. (2012), Razvitie ehmotsional'no-volevoi sfery lichnosti [Development of the emotional-volitional sphere of personality], Izd-vo Kurgan. gos. un-ta, Kurgan, RUS.

45. Filaletov, V. (2019), Vospitanie voli [Education of the will], Self-Pub, Moscow, RUS.

46. Nechaev, A.P. (1929), Sila voli i sredstva ee vospitaniya [Willpower and the means of its education], GIPL, M.; L., USSR.

47. Gumilev, L.N. (1989), Drevnyaya Rus' i Velikaya step' [Ancient Russia and the Great Steppe], Mysl', Moscow, USSR.

48. Kuhl, Ju. (1996), “Who controls whom when “I control myself”?”, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 7, iss. 1, pp. 61–68. DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli0701_12

49. Shlyapnikov, V.N. (2022), “Will: The Lost Link of Contemporary Foreign Psychology”, Experimental Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 72–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150105

50. Beck, U. (2000), Risikogesellschaft auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Transl. by Sedel'nik, V., Fedorova, Sh., Progress–Traditsiya, Moscow, RUS.


Review

For citations:


Stozhko D.K., Stozhko N.Yu. The Problem of Will in the Discourse of Humanitarian Culture. Discourse. 2026;12(2):32-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2026-12-2-32-48

Views: 142

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)