The Relationship between Christian Organizations and the Scientific Community in Modern Russia: the Experience of Sociological Research
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-4-88-102
Abstract
Introduction. The article presents the results of a sociological research devoted to the study of the relationship between Christian denominations and the scientific community in modern Russia. The relevance of the topic is due to the contradiction between the expansion of the discussion about the dialogue of religion and science among theologians and the rejection of this idea among ordinary Christians. At the same time, empirical studies of the attitude of Russian Christians to the scientific community are practically absent.
Methodology and sources. The methodological model of the study was an approach to studying the relationship between science and religion from the point of view of the ethos of the scientific and religious community. The methodology was also based on a typology that identifies such types of interrelationships between religion and science as confrontation and conflict, independence, dialogue, rapprochement and synthesis. The participants in the study, conducted in 2023–2024, were clergymen of the Russian Orthodox Church and major Protestant denominations such as Baptists, Pentecostals, Seventh-day Adventists, etc. The sample included both ordinary parishioners, church rectors, pastors, and clergymen who are teachers of Christian educational institutions. The research used methods such as standardized interviews and surveys.
Results and discussion. An analysis of the results showed that the majority of respondents believe that there is a dialogue between Christianity and science today. However, only a small number of Christian clergy and pastors who, in addition to theological, have a natural science education, have a clear understanding of what Christianity and science can discuss in this dialogue. Ordinary priests and parishioners of Christian churches continue to evaluate the relationship between Christianity and science as a confrontation or independence and treat science as a kind of knowledge that is fundamentally opposed and alien to Christianity.
Conclusion. Thus, the study showed that the features of the value system characteristic of the majority of the Christian community actually hinder their real interaction with scientists.
About the Author
T. N. Klementyeva
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana N. Klementyeva – Can. Sci. (Philosophy, 2002), Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy
52 Krasny ave., Novosibirsk 630091.
The author of 26 scientific publications.
Area of expertise: religious studies, religion and science.
References
1. Barbour, I.G. (2000), When Science Meets Religion: Enemies, Strangers, or Partners?, Harper Collins Publishers, San Francisco, USA.
2. Alexander, D. and White, R. (2004), Science and religion: friends or enemies? Chris-tian view of the latest scientific achievements, Lion Hudson, Oxford, UK.
3. Dawkins, R. (2006), The God Delusion, Bantam Press, London, UK.
4. Coyne, J.A. (2015), Faith Versus Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible, Viking, NY, USA.
5. Gould, S.J. (1999), Rocks of Ages. Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life, Ballantine Publishing Group, NY, USA.
6. Bart, K. (2005), Poslanie k rimlyanam [The Epistle to the Romans], Transl. by Hulapa, V., St. Andrew’s Biblical Theological Institute, Moscow, Russia.
7. Hammel, Ch. (1998), The Galileo Connection, Transl. by Shirochenskaya, A., Triada, Moscow, RUS.
8. Ros, A.A. (2001), V nachale… Vzaimosvyaz’ mezhdu naukoi i Pisaniem [At the beginning… The relationship between science and Scripture], Transl. by Kornienko, S.I,, Istochnik zhizni, Zaokskii, RUS.
9. Plantinga, A. and Dennett, D. (2010), Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?, Oxford Univ. Press, NY, USA.
10. Plantinga, A. (2011), Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, Oxford Univ. Press, NY, USA.
11. Polkinghorne, J.C. (2009), Theology in the Context of Science, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, USA.
12. Polkinghorne, J.C. (2011), Science and Religion in Quest of Truth, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, USA.
13. Vladimirov, Yu.S. (2008), “On the dialogue between the representatives of science and the Church”, XV Mezhdunarodnye Rozhdestvenskie Obrazovatel’nye Chteniya [XV International Christmas Educational Readings], Moscow, Russia, 29–30 Jan. 2008, pp. 3–11.
14. Vladimirov, Yu.S. (2017), Metafizika i fundamental’naya fizika [Metaphysics and fundamental physics], LENAND, Moscow, RUS.
15. Goman’kov, A.V. (2014), Bibliya i priroda. Evolutsiya, kreatsionizm i hristianskoe uchenie [The Bible and nature. Evolution, Creationism, and the Christian faith], GEOS, Moscow, RUS.
16. Mumrikov, O.A. (2011), “On the permissibility of the “natural-scientific” reading of the Holy Scriptures and the Church's reception of scientific worldviews”, Vsya premydrostiyu sotvoril esi…”, Seminary PSTGU “Nauka i vera”, iss.1, pp. 140–161.
17. Mumrikov, O.A. (2015), “On the principles of construction of Orthodox natural science apologetics of the XXI century”, Nauka i religiya v poiskah edinoi kartiny mira [Science and Religion: in search of a unified worldview], Moscow, RUS, 19 March 2015, pp. 88–99.
18. Otyutskiy, G.P. (2015), “Religious and scientific picture of the world: points of contact and interaction”, Nauka i religiya v poiskah edinoi kartiny mira [Science and Religion: in search of a unified worldview], Moscow, RUS, 19 March 2015, pp. 7–14.
19. Kyrlezhev, A., Shishkov, A. and Shmaliy, V. (2015), “The Dialogue of Religion and Science: New Approaches (An Overview of Discussions)”, State, Religion and Church In Russia and Worldwide, no. 1 (33), pp. 164–183.
20. Antonov, K. (2015), “The ethos of religion and forms of rationality”, State, Religion and Church In Russia and Worldwide, no. 1 (33), pp. 95–135.
Review
For citations:
Klementyeva T.N. The Relationship between Christian Organizations and the Scientific Community in Modern Russia: the Experience of Sociological Research. Discourse. 2025;11(4):88-102. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-4-88-102
Views:
35
Email this article 