Sociocultural Specificity of Conceptualization of Environmental Safety in the British Media Space

Introduction. Environmental safety as the most important value of modern society receives multiple and variable embodiment in media discourse, which acts as a powerful factor in influencing and shaping public opinion. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying the socio-culturally determined variability of representation of conceptual features of environmental safety in the British media discourse.

Methodology and sources. The study was conducted using a corpus of texts devoted to environmental safety, with a volume of over 200 thousand words, as well as using data from the News on Web (NOW) corpus, with a volume of over 1.9 billion words. The content specificity of value in high-quality and popular British media was determined based on the systematization and quantification of collocations with key lexemes that form the cognitivesemantic foundations of the media narrative.

Results and discussion. Modeling the conceptual component of the concept of “environmental safety” based on the means of its media representation showed that it includes the conceptualization of threats, risks, causes and sources of threats; negative consequences; actions aimed at combating threats and minimizing risks; subjects of actions that contribute to ensuring safety; objects whose safety must be ensured; necessary actions. Corpus analysis of collocations showed a socio-cultural difference in the discursive representation of environmental safety in the texts of the quality and popular press. The quality press emphasizes global warming, strategies for solving the problem, as well as adaptation to changed conditions and risk minimization; in the popular press, the problem of climate change dominates, while in the quality press the evaluative component of the concept is expanded, and instead of the neutral noun change in combination with the noun climate, the negatively evaluative lexeme crisis is used.

Conclusion. The proposed methodology can be used in the analysis of the substantive specificity of other conceptual formations in media discursive practices, in the study of the linguocultural component of the discourse of environmental safety in the aspect of sociocultural and ideological variability.

1. Karasik, V.I. (2002), Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse], Peremena, Volgograd, RUS

2. Karasik, V.I. (2025), “Linguocultural conceptology as a direction of anthropological linguistics”, Lingvokul'turnaya kontseptologiya [Linguistic and cultural conceptology], iss. 31, Vorkachev, S.G., Karasik, V.I., Maslova, V.I. and Pimenova, M.V., in Pimenova, M.V. (ed.), UNECON, SPb., RUS, pp. 19–156.

3. Kochetova, L.A. and Kononova, I.V. (2024), “Media Studies of Regulatory Value of Healthy Lifestyle in English Media: A Corpus-Based Approach”, Nauchnyi dialog, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 186–208. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-6-186-208.

4. Karasik, V.I. (2023), “The Routs of Language and Culture Studies: Concepts, Scripts, Personality Types, Subject Plots”, Philological Readings, Materials of the VI All-Russian Sci. Conf., Yaroslavl, RUS, 28–29 April 2023, pp. 61–71.

5. Efremova, M.P. (2021), “Concept “SAFETY/SECURITY” in the English language picture of the world”, Abstract. of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, SPbSEU, SPb., RUS.

6. Kochetova, L.A. and Ilyinova, E.Yu. (2023), “Linguocultural Specifics of Cybersecurity Discursive Practices Representation in Russian Media Communication: Corpus-Assisted Approach”, Nauchnyi dialog, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 134–152. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-3-134-152.

7. Karasik, V.I. (2024), “Value Picture of the World as an Object of Linguoaxiological Linguistics”, Languages, Literatures and Cultures of the Peoples of Russia in Modern Academic Science, Col. of Materials of the Int. Sci. and Pr. Conf., Kazan, RUS, 9–11 October 2024, pp. 183–188.

8. Ivanova, E.V. (2007), “Metaphorical conceptualization of natural disasters in environmental discourse (based on media texts)”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, CSU, Chelyabinsk, RUS.

9. Zaitseva, A.V. (2014), “Typology of texts of environmental discourse in the FRG: specialty 10.02.04 “Germanic languages””, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, SmolGU, Smolensk, RUS.

10. Dryzek, J.S. (2005), The politics of the earth: environmental discourses, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.

11. Hajer, M.A. (1995), The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process, Clarendon Press, NY, USA.

12. Steciag, M. (2010), “Environmental discourse in public debate in Poland: relativization, exclusion and acceptance”, Language and Ecology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–16.

13. Jung, M. (2001), “Ecological Criticism of Language”, The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment, in Fill, A. and Muhlhausler, P. (eds.), Continuum, London, NY, UK, pp. 270–285.

14. Kochetova, L.A. (2023), “Linguocultural Specifics of Artificial Intelligence Representation in the English Language Media Discourse: Corpus-Based Approach”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 22, no. 5. pp. 6–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.5.1.

15. Klushina, N.I. (2014), “Mediatization of modern culture and Russian national style“, Russian speech, no. 1, pp. 66–73.

16. Karasik, V.I. (2014), Yazykovoe proyavlenie lichnosti [Linguistic Manifestation of Personality], Paradigma, Volgograd, RUS.

17. Radbil, T.B. (2023), “Linguistic Embodiment of Values in Internet Media Discourse: A Corpus Analysis of Representative Contexts (the Lexeme ‘pokhoroshemu’)”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 12 (6), pp. 170– 189. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-6-170-189.

18. Brezina, V. and Platt, W. (2024), #LancsBox X [software], Lancaster Univ., USA, available at: http://lancsbox.lancs.ac.uk (accessed 20.10.2024).

19. Orlova, N.V. (2021), “Semantic Series as a Discourse Analysis Tool (Discourse about Generations)”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 7, pp. 108–122. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-7-108-122.

20. Boyle, L. (2023), “Biden administration releases ‘gold standard’ climate report which Trump tried to thwart”, Independent, 14.11.2023, available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/climatechange/news/biden-national-climate-assessement-trump-b2446684.html (accessed 24.10.2024).

21. Hicks, N. and Ranger, N. (2013), “What are the potential impacts of climate change for the UK?”, The Guardian, 08.10.2013, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/oct/08/potential-impacts-climate-change-uk (accessed 30.10.2024).

22. Taylor, J.R. (2003), Cognitive Grammar, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.

23. Fernandez, C. (2023), “The British seabirds at risk of EXTINCTION: Experts warn Puffins, Fulmars, and Arctic Terns could be wiped out thanks to climate change”, Daily Mail, 21.12.2023, available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12890259/The-British-seabirds-riskEXTINCTION-Experts-warn-Puffins-Fulmars-Arctic-Terns-wiped-thanks-climate-change.html (accessed 24.10.2024).

24. Kubryakova, E.S., Dem'yankov, V.Z., Pankrats, Yu.G and Luzina, L.G. (1996), Kratkii slovar' kognitivnykh terminov [Brief Dictionary of Cognitive Terms], in Kubryakova, E.S. (ed.), MSU, Moscow, RUS.

25. Boyd, M. (2020), “Frightening climate change map shows huge swathes of UK under water by 2050”, The Mirror, 22.06.2020, available at: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/frighteningclimate-change-map-shows-21333264 (accessed 15.11.2024).