“Text of Culture” as a Category of Cultural Philosophy: from Semiotic Theory to Research Practice

Introduction. Culture manifests itself in texts, one “reads” them, communicates with them. This communication takes place with varying degrees of competence; a high degree of competence is a necessary requirement for “reading” a cultural text in research practice. The article presents a metatheoretical construction on the basis of the analysis of the semiotic theory of the “text of culture” of the Tartu-Moscow school. The aim of the analysis is to develop a cultural-philosophical research practice. The author addresses the following tasks: justification of the necessity of metatheoretical constructions around Lotman's semiotics of culture; categorisation of the “text of culture”; characterisation of the semiosis of the “text of culture” as the necessary generation of the metatext; outlining the principles of research "reading" of the “text of culture”. The article is of a theoretical and methodological character.

Methodology and sources. The methodological basis of the research is the traditions of Russian cultural semiotics and the Tartu-Moscow semiotic school. The main parameters for the selection of scientific publications: the degree of semiotic problematization of the cultural text; the possibility of explicating the concepts being sought; the perspective of meta-theoretical constructions.

Results and discussion. The study allows us to formulate theoretical and methodological conclusions. The necessity of developing semiotics of culture in the Tartu-Moscow school is justified by the increasing complexity of modern culture as an open dynamic system, and by the un-realized methodological purpose of the institution. The “text of culture” is the most important notion of cultural-philosophical research. Its necessary categorization opens perspectives for the development of procedures of semiotic analysis of artifact as the “text of culture”, and for the interpretation of its semiosis, taking into account the mechanisms of functioning of immanent structures. The most important direction of cultural-philosophical analysis of the cultural text is its semiosis, which is treated as the sign functioning of the artifact-text within the boundaries of an open system that is culture as “one”.

Conclusion. Principle aspects of the proposed cultural-philosophical practice: 1) the categorical system of semiotics of culture has to include the position of “text of culture” which fixes genetic relationship of text and culture; 2) “semiosis” of artifact as “text of culture” naturally generates metatextual space of culture as a result of systems openness within the borders of culture as “the one”.

1. Rеdkоllеgiya (1964), “Оt redаktsii”, Uchеnyе zаpiski Таrtuskоgо gоsudаrstvеnnоgо univеrsitеtа. Тrudy pо znаkоvym sistеmаm, vol. 1, Lоtmаn Yu.М. Lеktsii pо structural'nоi pоetikе. iss. 1 (Vvеdеniе, teoriya stikhа) [Scientific Notes of the Tartu State University. Works on sign systems. Vol. 1. Lotman Yu. M. Lectures on structural poetics. Issue. 1 (Introduction, theory of verse)], Таrtuskii gocudarstvennyi universitet, Таrtu, USSR, pp. 3–4.

2. Pоcheptsоv, G.G. (1998), Istoriya russkoi semiotiki do I posle 1917 goda [History of Russian semiotics before and after 1917], Lаbirint, Moscow, RUS.

3. Pochеptsоv, G.G. (2001), Russkaya semiotika: Idei i metody, personalii, istoriya [Russian semiotics: Ideas and methods, personalities, history.], Refl-buk, Moscow, RUS.

4. Shаtоvа, Е.N. (2022), “Semiotika kak metodologiya filosofsko-kulturologichеskogo znaniya: tartusko-moskovskaya shkola”, Filosofiya i religiovecenie v Leningradskom gosudarstvennom universitete imeni А. S. Pushkina [Philosophy and Religious Studies at Pushkin Leningrad State University], Smirnov, М.Yu. (ed.), LGU im. А. S. Pushkina, SPb., RUS, pp. 90–111.

5. Zolyan, S.T. (2020), Yurii Lotman: o smysle, tekste, istorii. Temy i variatsii [Yuri Lotman: about the meaning, text, history. Themes and Variations], 2nd ed., ID YaSK, Moscow, RUS.

6. Koshelev, A.D., (1994), Yu. М. Lоtmаn i tаrtusko-mоskоvskaya semioticheskaya shkolа [Yu.M. Lotman and the Tartu-Moscow semiotic school], Gnozis, Moscow, RUS.

7. Neklyudov, S.Yu. (1998), Moskovsko-tartuskaya semioticheskaya shkola. Istoriya, vospominaniya, razmyshleniya [Moscow-Tartu semiotic school. History, memories, reflections.], Shkola “Yazyki russkoi kul'tury”, Moscow, RUS.

8. “University, teacher, scientific and technological revolution (conversation with Yu.M. Lotman)” (1986), Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly [Alma Mater], no. 7, pp. 69–73.

9. “Conversations with Professor Lotman”, (1991), Digest “Leningrad University”, April 12, pp. 8–9.

10. Itskovich, D. (1991), ““Speaking of modernity, I will say this…”. On the place of culture in the modern world: a conversation with prof. Tart. State Univ. Yu.M. Lotman”, Nezavisimaya Gazeta, July 16, p. 7.

11. Lotman, Yu.М. (1993), “City and Time”, Metafizika Peterburga [Metaphysics of Petersburg], Eidos, SPb., RUS, pp. 84–92.

12. Lotman, Yu.М. (1994), Besedy о russkoi kulture: Byt i tracizii russkogo dvoryanstva (XVIII – nаchаlо XIX veka) [Conversations about Russian culture: life and traditions of the Russian nobility (XVIII – early XIX century)], Iskusstvo-SPB, SPb., RUS.

13. “Full course "Conversations about Russian culture ..." by Yuri Lotman”, Livejournal, available at: https://philologist.livejournal.com/8253720.html (accessed 07.02.2023).

14. Lotman, Yu.М. (2005), Vospitanie dushi [Soul Education], Iskusstvo-SPB, SPb., RUS.

15. Lotman, Yu.M. (1981), “Semiotics of culture and the concept of text”, Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Т. 12. Struktura i semiotika khudozhestvennogo teksta [Scientific Notes of the Tartu State University. Works on sign systems. Vol. 12. Structure and semiotics of a literary text], Таrtuskii gocudarstvennyi universitet, Таrtu, USSR, pp. 3–7.

16. Lotman, Yu.M. (1981), “Text within the text”, Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Trudy po znakovym sistemam. Т. 14. Tekst v tekste [Scientific Notes of the Tartu State University. Works on sign systems. Vol. 14. Text in the text], Таrtuskii gocudarstvennyi universitet, Таrtu, USSR, pp. 3–18.

17. Shаtоvа, Е.N. (2016), Filosofiya kulturnogo teksta: praktika semioticheskoi interpritatsii [Philosophy of the cultural text: the practice of semiotic interpretation], LGU im. А. S. Pushkina, SPb., RUS.

18. Kant, I. (1999), Kritik der reinen Vernunft, Trans. by Lossky, N.O., Moscow, Nauka, RUS.