Socio-Professional Group of IT Specialists: Conceptualization of the Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of the Study
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-2-78-92
Abstract
Introduction. For sociology, it is important to understand the content and forms of integration of IT specialists as one of the types of social associations. Such an analysis is important to carry out since the interpretation and content characteristics of this community subsequently guide all other elements of the strategy of theoretical and empirical research. In particular, it is relevant to identify: in what capacity of a “professional community” or “professional group” IT specialists act as a real social phenomenon.
Methodology and sources. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of IT specialists involved identifying the nature and forms of their social integration: as socioprofessional groups, or as socio-professional communities. Based on the analysis of the fundamental provisions of foreign and Russian sociologists F. Tennis, J. Shchepansky, R. Merton, K. Manheim, T.M. Mills, P.A. Sorokin, V.A. Yadov, and many others, the differences in the understanding of “community” and “group” are revealed as a reflection of the special essential characteristics of these forms of integration.
Results and discussion. The results of the analysis of statistical data show that the concept of a social group is used much more often than the concept of community in characterizing integration processes; this is a more relevant category for modern research. The results confirm the significant connection between the concept of “group” and the concepts of “values”, “common goal”, and “professional”. Exploring the numerous features of IT specialists, such as self-education, the desire to organize training based on introspection, significant differences from other specialists in the system of professions “human-sign system”, such as erudition and logical thinking, mastering mathematics, English language, the Internet as necessary starting conditions for entering the profession, the authors use the definition of a professional or social group.
Conclusion. IT professionals should be considered a special socio-professional group with all the signs of such social integration. IT professionals operate in today's multidimensional social space. As a social group, IT specialists are united by the presence of a common feature – activities in a special environment – in the information and digital space, common social values.
About the Authors
P. P. DeryuginRussian Federation
Pavel P. Deryugin – Dr. Sci. (Sociology, 2002), Associate Member, Head of the RussianChinese Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Sociological Institute of the RAS – FCTAS RAS; Professor at the Department of Applied and Specialized Sociology, Saint Petersburg State University; Professor at the Department of Sociology and Political Science, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
25/14 7th Krasnoarmeiskaya str., St Petersburg 190005,
7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034,
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
O. S. Bannova
Russian Federation
Olesya S. Bannova – Postgraduate at the Department of Sociology and Political Science
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
A. G. Maranchak
Russian Federation
Anastasia G. Maranchak – Postgraduate at the Department of Sociology and Political Science
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
References
1. Mehdi Mafi, (2012), “A Hierarchical Model of ICT in Digital Society to Access Information”, Canadian J. on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, vol. 3, iss. 7, pp. 366–374.
2. Mishchenko, A.S. (2016), “"Innovators" as a specific socio-professional group in modern Russia”, Petersburg Sociology Today, no. 7, pp. 319–349.
3. Radaev, V.V. and Shkaratan, O.I. (1996), Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya [Social stratification], AspektPress, Moscow, RUS.
4. Shkaratan, O.I. (2006), Professionals and Managers: Socioeconomic Situation and Behaviour in the Sphere of Employment, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RUS.
5. Goode, W. (1972), “Community within a Community: the Professions”, Sociological Perspectives on Occupations, F. E. Peacock Publishers, Illinois, USA, pp. 194–200.
6. Dingwall, R. (1983), “Introduction”, The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers, Doctors and Others, in Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. (eds.), Macmillan, London, GBR, pp. 11–18.
7. Mansurov, V.A. and Yurchenko, O.V. (2013), “Sociology of professional groups: history and prospects”, Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, no. 7, pp. 91–106.
8. Tikhonova, N.E. (2006), “Resources' approach as new theoretical paradigm in stratification studies”, Sociological Studies, no. 9, pp. 28–40.
9. Zdravomyslov, A.G. and Yadov, V.A. (2003), Chelovek i ego rabota v SSSR i posle [Man and his work in the USSR and after], Aspekt-Press, Moscow, RUS.
10. Lapin, N.I. (2008), Teoriya i praktika innovatiki [Theory and practice of innovation], Logos, Moscow, RUS.
11. Borisova, S.N. (2016), “The study of professions and professional groups in Russian sociology: theoretical and methodological analysis”, Vestnik of Lobachevsky State Univ. of Nizhni Novgorod. Ser.: Social Sciences, no. 2 (42), pp. 144–148.
12. Frolov, S.S. (1994), Sotsiologiya [Sociology], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.
13. Collins Dictionary of Sociology (1999), in 2 vol., vol. 1, Transl. by Marchuk, N.N., Moscow, RUS, p. 511.
14. Zemnukhova, L.V. (2010), “Employers of lT as a professional society”, St. Petersburg Sociology Today, no. 2, pp. 402–420.
15. Kasyanenko, I. and Alabin, A. (2017), “IT specialists as a modern professional group”, Inter, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 98–104.
16. Radugin, A.A. and Radugin, K.A. (2006), Sotsiologiya [Sociology], Biblionika, Moscow, RUS.
17. Shlyakhtun, P.P. (2005), “Socio-professional communities”, Politologiya (teoriya i istoriya politicheskoi nauki) [Political science (theory and history of political science)], Lybid', Kiev, UKR, available at: https://banauka.ru/2243.html (accessed 12.01.2023).
18. Korableva, G.B. (2006), “Institutional foundations for the formation of professional communities”, Bulletin of the South Ural State Univ. Ser.: Social Sciences and the Humanities, no. 2 (57), pp. 126–127.
19. Gorokhov, V.F. and Vasneva, N.N. (2014), “On correlation of categories “social unity” and “social group“, Tambov Univ. Review, no. 4 (132), pp. 12–21.
20. Tönnies, F. (2002), Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft Grundbegriffe der reinen Soziologie, Transl. by Sklyadnev, D.V., SPb., RUS.
21. Szczepanski, Ja. (1969), Elementarne pojecia socjologii, Transl. by Gurenko, M.M., Progress, Moscow, USSR.
22. Yadov, V.A. (2003), Strategiya sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya: opisanie, ob"yasnenie, ponmanie sotsial'noi real'nosti [Strategy of sociological research: description, explanation, understanding of social reality], Dobrosvet, Moscow, RUS.
23. Zborovsky, G.E. (2010), “Theoretical foundations for studying social community”, Sociological Studies, no. 4, pp. 3–12.
24. Deryugin, P.P. and Samarina, E.L. (2014), ”Ethnic entrepreneurship as an adaptation strategy in transforming Russia (system modeling)”, Russian J. of Education and Psychology, no. 8, pp. 87–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2218-7405-2014-8-10.
25. Freeman, L.C. (1992), “The Sociological Concept of “Group”: An Empirical Test of Two Models”, American J. of Sociology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 152–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/229972.
26. Durkheim, E. (1990), De la division du travail social, Transl. by Gofman, А.B., Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
27. Gumplowicz, L. (1994), “Grundniss der Sozilogie”, Teksty po istorii sotsiologii XIX-XX vv. Khrestomatiya [Texts on the history of sociology of the XIX-XX centuries. Reader], in Dobren'kov, V.I. and Belenkova, L.P. (eds.), Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 84–125.
28. Sorokin, P.A. (1994), Obshchedostupnyi uchebnik sotsiologii. Stat'i raznykh let [Public textbook of sociology. Articles of different years], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.
29. Mannheim, К. (2000), Essays on the Sociology of Culture, Transl. by Volfson, L.F. and Dranov, A.V., Moscow, SPb., RUS.
30. Kravchenko, A.I. (2000), Sotsiologiya [Sociology], Yurait, Moscow, RUS.
31. Helkama, К. (1999), “Recherches recentes sur les valeurs”, in Beauvois, J.-L., Dubois, N., Doise, W. and Boukarroum, A. (eds.), La construction sociale de la personne, Presses Univ. de Grenoble, Grenoble, FRA, pp. 61–75.
32. Telmanova, E.D. (2011), “Self-employed craftsmen's common values as a pedagogic problem”, Obrazovanie i nauka. Izvestiya UrO RAO [Education and science. News of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Education], no. 8, pp. 45–56.
33. Тerekhova, Т.А., Тrofimova, Е.L. and Geranyushkina, G.P. (2020), “Values of Entrepreneurs form Various Socio-Demographic Groups”, The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Ser.: Psychology, vol. 33, pp. 69–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26516/2304-1226.2020.33.69.
34. Bormotov, I.V. (2016), “The choice of values of the Russian youth: group cut”, Modern Studies of Social Issues, no. 3–1 (27), pp. 123–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2016-3-1-123-133.
35. Maslennikov, A.A., Volkov, V.V. and Kapba, S.R. (2018), “Psychological aspects of educational organization management in the context of the integration of personal and group values”, Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya [Problems of modern pedagogical education], no. 61–1, pp. 387–390.
36. Frankel, Ch. (1969), “Social Values and Professional Values”, J. of Education for Social Work, vol. 5, iss. 1, pp. 29–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220612.1969.10671808.
Review
For citations:
Deryugin P.P., Bannova O.S., Maranchak A.G. Socio-Professional Group of IT Specialists: Conceptualization of the Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of the Study. Discourse. 2023;9(2):78-92. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-2-78-92