Beginning and Completion of Events in the Russian and English Language Picture of the World and Features of their Perception in the National Language Consciousness
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-4-115-127
Abstract
Introduction. The question of the correspondence between the linguistic representation of concepts that make up the national linguistic picture of the world and the linguistic consciousness of the nation is examined on the basis of the concepts of the beginning and completion of the event. The grammatical structure of the language puts the native speaker in the framework of the concepts formed earlier and limits the choice to accessible language means.
Methodology and sources. In order to determine the peculiarities of the perception of the event structure by native Russian and English speakers, as well as to establish how much the scope of concepts coincides or differs in national language pictures of the world, a comparative analysis of the dominant elements of the functional semantic fields of the beginning and completion of the event was used.
Results and discussion. The analysis of linguistic means was carried out on the basis of the functional-semantic approach. Psycholinguistic analysis of linguistic consciousness was carried out on the basis of data from associative dictionaries of the Russian and English languages. The study also provides information on the structure of the event and statistical data describing the linguistic representation of the beginnings and completion in Russian and English at all levels from grammatical to syntactic.
Conclusion. It was found out, that the source of semantic originality of the means of expression of beginning and end, constituting the corresponding functional semantic fields, can be not only differences in the grammatical system of the language, but also cultural-conditioned discrepancies in the scope of the concepts themselves. This means that the psycholinguistic features of concept perception in the national language consciousness have a direct impact on the choice of language means when translating or using the language as a means of communication by bilinguals.
About the Author
T. N. Osintseva
State Marine Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatiana N. Osintseva – Cand. Sci. (Philology) (2000), Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages
3 Lotsmanskaya str., St Petersburg 190121, Russia
References
1. Gumbol'dt, V. (1985), Yazyk i filosofiya kul'tury [Language and Philosophy of Culture], Progress, Moscow, USSR.
2. Radchenko, O.A. (1993), “Lingvophilosophical neo-romanticism of J. L. Weisgerber”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics], no. 2. pp. 107–114.
3. Shabes, V.Ya. (1989), Sobytie i tekst [Event and text], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, USSR.
4. Comrie, B. (1978), Aspect. An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, GBR.
5. Leech, G.V. (1971), Meaning of the English Verb, Longman Group, London, GBR.
6. Vendler, Z. (1981), “On the word good”, in Oborina, M.A. (ed.), Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics], Progress, Moscow, USSR, vol. 10, pp. 531–554.
7. Freed, A.F. (1979), The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland, Boston, USA.
8. Osintseva, T.N. (2003), Category "event" in cognitive linguistics, in Tomashpol'skii, V.I and Chudinov, A.P. (ed.), Lingvistika: Byulleten' Ural'skogo lingvisticheskogo obshchestva, Ekaterinburg, Russia, vol. 9, pp. 40–47.
9. Osintseva, T.N. (2002), “Functional semantic field of the beginning of the event in the English and Russian languages: a comparative analysis of aspectual means”, Can. of Philol. Sci. Thesis, Ural State Pedagogical Univ., Ekaterinburg, Russia.
10. Osintseva, T.N. (2018), “Functional-semantic field of the completeness of action in English and Russian languages”, Aktual'nye problemy yazykoznaniya [Actual problems of linguistics], SPb., Russia, 17– 18 apr. 2018, pp. 99–105.
11. Vakulenko, S.V. (1989), “Interlanguage semantic equivalence of lexical units (using the example of English and Russian verbs)”, Can. of Philol. Sci. Thesis, Un-t druzhby narodov im. Partisa Lumumby, Moscow, USSR.
12. Karaulov, Yu.V. (ed.) (2012), Russkii assotsiativnyi slovar' [Russian associative dictionary], RAN, AST, Moscow, Russia, vol. 1–2, pp. 1771.
13. Visual Thesaurus (2019), available at: https://www.visualthesaurus.com (accessed 08.06.2019).
14. Sakharnyi, L.V. (1994), “Man and text: two text grammars”, in Kupina, N.A. end Matveeva, T.V. (ed.), Chelovek – tekst – kul'tura [Man – Text – Culture], IRRO, Ekaterinburg, Russia, pp. 17–20.
15. Ufimtseva, N.V. (2011), Yazykovoe soznanie: dinamika i variativnost' [Linguistic Consciousness: Dynamics and Variability], In-t yazykoznaniya RAN, Moscow, Kaluga, Russia.
Review
For citations:
Osintseva T.N. Beginning and Completion of Events in the Russian and English Language Picture of the World and Features of their Perception in the National Language Consciousness. Discourse. 2019;5(4):115-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-4-115-127
Views:
345
Email this article 