Metaphorical Representations of United States Healthcare Problems in Post-Event User-Generated Online Discourse

Introduction. This article dwells on the metaphorical construction of the U.S. healthcare system's image in online discourse following the assassination of UnitedHealthcare's CEO. The scientific novelty lies in a sociological interpretation of metaphors that construct social institutions’ images and legitimize public assessments and forms of collective action. The relevance of the study stems from the high conflict potential of healthcare, the commercialization of medical services, and social inequalities in access to treatment.

Methodology and sources. The theoretical framework draws on the theory of metaphor by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, critical discourse analysis, and sociological approaches to metaphor as a tool of social construction. The empirical base consists of 5,229 comments on materials published by the international media outlet MailOnline concerning the killing of B. Thompson, CEO of the largest U.S. insurance corporation. The study employs thematic analysis and lexicographic content analysis using the AntConc software; selection was based on the frequency and semantic salience of lexical units and metaphorical collocations.

Results and discussion. The analysis reveals two primary objects of metaphorization: the healthcare system, including its financial and economic attributes, and the managers who ensure its operation. Through their discussion, users establish a dichotomy of “victims versus a dehumanized system”, a framework that legitimizes the violence committed. This user-generated discourse signals a profound social crisis and points to a potential for solidarity among parts of society in opposition to corporate domination.

Conclusion. In post-event online discourse, metaphors function not only as rhetorical elements but also as epistemological mechanisms that shape collective understandings of the healthcare crisis and define the frameworks of social responsibility, moral evaluation of institutional order, and protest mobilization.

1. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019), Emotions, Media and Politics, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

2. Bondarenko, I.V. (2019), “Linguistic and pragmatic potential of metaphors in political discourse”, Vestnik of Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal Univ. Ser. Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology, no. 2, pp. 52–60.

3. Pavlova, N.D. and Grebenshchikova, T.A. (2020), “Post-eventual discourse in online communities: intentional structure and the manners of discursive impact”, Experimental Psychology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 138–148. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2020130110

4. Pavlova, N.D., Afinogenova, V.A., Kubrak, T.A. and Zachesova, I.A. (2022), “Speech Intentions and Referential Objects in Discourse of Social Media (Based on the Discussions in the Context of Lockdown)”, Experimental Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 139–156. DOI: 10.17759/exppsy.2022150409

5. Chudinov, A.P. (2003), Metaforicheskaya mozaika v sovremennoi politicheskoi kommunikatsii [Metaphorical mosaic in modern political communication], Ural State Pedagogical Univ., Ekaterinburg, RUS.

6. Zinov'ev, N.V. (2019), “Living, Dead and Reanimated Metaphors in Political Discourse (Based on the Speeches of D. Cameron and B. Obama)”, Political Linguistics, no. 6 (78), pp. 57–63. DOI: 10.26170/pl19-06-07

7. Aleshina, E.Yu. (2017), “Discursive reflection of the result of political conflict in a public speech (based on the English language)”, Political Linguistics, no. 2 (62), pp. 65–70.

8. Kalinin, O.I. (2025), Metafora kak predmet lingvisticheskikh issledovanii [Metaphor as a subject of linguistic research], Rusains, Moscow, RUS.

9. Blokh, M.Ya. and Molchanova, E.S. (2021), “Metaphors and similes in the genres of internet-discourse”, Bulletin of the Moscow Region State Univ., Ser. Linguistics, no. 3, pp. 6–14. DOI: 10.18384/2310-712X-2021-3-6-14

10. Oparina, E.O. (2021), “Metaphor in discourse”, Social Sciences and Humanities Domestic and Foreign Literature. Ser. 6. Linguistics, no. 3, pp. 131–141. DOI: 10.31249/ling/2021.03.10

11. Kravchenko, A.I. (2016), “Metaphors in sociology: a new perspective or a road to nowhere?”, Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 7 (387), pp. 124–133.

12. Musolff, A. (2016), “Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation”, Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 205–224. DOI:10.1075/msw.6.2.02mus

13. Agafonova, K.E. (2017), “Metaphors in Political Discourse as an Instrument of Influence on Addressee”, RUDN J. of Language Education and Translingual Practices, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 588–594. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8011-2017-14-4-588-594

14. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (2004), Metaphors We Live By, Transl. by Baranov, A.N and Morozova, A.V., in Baranov, A.N. (ed.), Editorial URSS, Moscow, RUS.

15. Budaev, Eh.V. and Chudinov, A.P. (2006), Metafora v politicheskom interdiskurse [Metaphor in political interdiscourse], Ural. gos. ped. un-t, Ekaterinburg, RUS.

16. Serebrennikov, B.A., Kubryakova, E.S., Postovalova, V.I. et al. (1988), “Metaphorization and its role in creating a linguistic picture of the world”, Rol' chelovecheskogo faktora v yazyke: Yazyk i kartina mira [he role of the human factor in language: Language and the picture of the world], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 173–204.

17. Fairclough, N. (1992), Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

18. Van Dijk, T.A. (1998), Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Sage, London, UK.

19. Wodak, R. (2009), “The discourse-historical approach”, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, in Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Sage, London, UK, pp. 63–94.

20. Markham, A.N. (2023), “Metaphors reflecting and shaping the reality of the Internet: tool, place, way of being”, Transl. by Gurevich, K., Urban Folklore & Anthropology, vol. V, no. 1, pp. 57–79. DOI: 10.22394/2658-3895-2023-6-1-57-79

21. Pavlova, N.D., Grebenshchikova, T.A., Afinogenova, V.A. et al. (2020), “Intentional space of post-event discourse on various internet sites”, Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 78–91. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009327-5

22. Foley, J. (2024), “Lost in a sea of highlight reels: The use of social media and mental health metaphors in online health blogs”, Research in Corpus Linguistics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26–56. DOI: 10.32714/ricl.13.01.03

23. “Dailymail.co.uk. Website Analysis for October 2025” (2025), Similarweb, available at: https://www.similarweb.com/website/dailymail.co.uk/#overview (accessed 15.01.2026).

24. Potter, W. and Sexton, B. (2024), “UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson shot and killed outside Manhattan Hilton hotel”, Daily Mail, 04.12.2024, available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14157375/United-Health-Brian-Thompson-Hilton-Manhattan-shot.html (accessed 15.01.2026).

25. Reynolds, J.C. (2024), “UnitedHealthcare CEO's assassination triggers outpouring of hate directed at health insurance industry”, Daily Mail, 06.12.2024, available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14164727/united-healthcare-ceo-brian-thompson-assassin-support.html (accessed 15.01.2026).

26. Koenig, M. (2024), “UnitedHealthcare Group boss defends Brian Thompson and company track record in leaked video message to staff”, Daily Mail, 09.12.2024, available at: https:// www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14172007/UnitedHealth-group-CEO-Andrew-Witty-defend-denials-coverage.html (accessed 15.01.2026).

27. Sontag, S. (2016), Illness as Metaphor, Transl. by Dadyan, M.A. and Sokolinskaya, A.E., Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, RUS.

28. Lo, J., Long, M., Wallace, R., Salaga, M. and Pestaina, K. (2025), “Claims Denials and Appeals in ACA Marketplace Plans in 2023”, Kaiser Family Foundation, 27.01.2025, available at: https://www.kff.org/private-insurance/claims-denials-and-appeals-in-aca-marketplace-plans-in-2023/ (accessed 15.01.2026).

29. Arendt, H. (2014), On Violence, Transl. by Dashevskii, G., Novoe izdatel'stvo, Moscow, RUS.

30. Coombs, W.T. and Holladay, S.J. (1996), “Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication”, J. of Public Relations Research, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 279–295. DOI: 10.1207/s1532754xjprr0804_04

31. Skitka, L.J. and Houston, D.A. (2001), “When Due Process Is of No Consequence: Moral Mandates and Presumed Defendant Guilt or Innocence”, Social Justice Research, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 305–326. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014372008257

32. Gollust, S.E., Lantz, P.M. and Ubel, P.A. (2009), “The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health”, American J. of Public Health, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. 2160–2167. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.161414