The Linguistic Situation and Cultural Identity of the Russian North: Prospects for Interdisciplinary Research

Introduction. The concept of the “Russian North” represents a historical and cultural region with debatable boundaries, often associated with the term “European North. The region is characterized by multi-ethnicity and close contact between Russians and Finno-Ugric peoples, which has led to the development of a complex, multilayered cultural identity that combines pan-Russian, local, and ethnic elements, manifested in the specific historical and cultural development and linguistic practices of the population.

Methodology and sources. The methodological basis of the study consists of narrative and dialogic approaches, systematic analysis of scientific texts, comparative and contrastive methods, logical and methodological reconstruction, and methods of lingual geography, sociolinguistics, and dialectology. The empirical base consists of publications on issues of cultural identity in studies of the Russian North and the linguistic situation in multiethnic regions.

Results and discussion. The Russian North, in sociolinguistic and cultural-philosophical aspects, represents a zone of long-term interethnic and interlingual contact, where the interaction of Russian and Finno-Ugric languages led to the formation of bilingualism, provoked language shift, and served as the basis for the development of a hybrid identity among the population. Linguistic research (including studies of substrate vocabulary, toponymy, and dialects) confirms the profound influence of the Finno-Ugric heritage on the region's Russian dialects. The current linguistic situation is characterized by the coexistence of the dominant Russian language with vulnerable and endangered indigenous languages (Veps, Izhorian, Votic, Karelian, and others), functioning under conditions of limited use and partial preservation.

Conclusion. Future research into the linguistic situation and cultural identity of the Russian North relies on expanding the empirical base with new sources, including digital language corpora, self-documents (diaries, autobiographies, personal letters), educational literature for bilingual regions, and everyday communication materials. These data will allow for more accurate tracking of identity dynamics in real social and institutional practices.

1. Permilovskaya, A.B. (2016), “Russian North is a Specific Code of Cultural Memory”, Culture and Art, no. 2, pp. 155–163. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2016.2.18345

2. Bernshtam, T.A. and Chistov, K.V. (ed.). (1992), Russkiy Sever: arealy i kulturnye traditsii [The Russian North: Areas and Cultural Traditions], Nauka, SPb., RUS.

3. Malakhov, V.S. (2005), “Inconveniences with identity”, Voprosy Filosofii, no. 2, pp. 43–53.

4. Geertz, C. (1973), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, NY, USA.

5. Brass, P. (1991), Ethnicity and Nationalism: Theory and Comparison, Sage, London, UK.

6. Anderson, B. (2016), Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, Transl. by Nikolaev, V., Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, RUS.

7. Matveev, A.K. (2015), Substratnaya toponimiya Russkogo Severa [Substrate Toponymy of the Russian North], in 4 vols., Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, Ekaterinburg, RUS.

8. Teush, O.A. (2016), “New material on the Komi borrowing in the dialects of the Russian north (Lensky district of Arkhangelsk region)”, Finno-Ugric World, no. 1 (26), pp. 49–59.

9. Kabinina, N.V. (2015), “Problems in the study of the Finno-Ugric substrate toponymy of the Russian north”, Linguistica, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 207–228. DOI: 10.4312/linguistica.55.1.207-228

10. Kirisheva, T.I. (2006), “Russian Toponymy of Finno-Ugric Origin on the Territory of the Onega Peninsula”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, UrFU, Ekaterinburg, RUS.

11. “Spiritual Culture of the Russian North in Folk Literature: Expedition Materials” (2023), Repository. St. Petersburg State Univ., available at: https://dspace.spbu.ru/handle/11701/44514 (accessed 05.05.2026).

12. Myznikov, S.A. (2004), Leksika finno-ugorskogo proiskhozhdeniya v russkikh govorakh Severo-Zapada. Etimologicheskiy i lingvogeograficheskiy analiz [Vocabulary of Finno-Ugric Origin in Russian Dialects of the North-West. Etymological and Linguogeographic Analysis], Nauka, SPb., RUS.

13. Avanesov, R.I. (ed.), (1997), Dialektologicheskiy atlas russkogo yazyka. Tsentr Evrop-eyskoy chasti Rossii. Vypusk III: Karty (chast 1). Leksika [Dialectological Atlas of the Russian Language. Center of the European Part of Russia. Issue III: Maps (Part 1). Vocabulary], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

14. Zorina, L.Yu. (2024), “In the Vologda Region, Philologist Lyudmila Zorina has been Researching Local Dialects for Fifty Years”, GorodChe, 15.10.2024, available at https://www.gorodche.ru/society/5637052-v-vologodskoy-oblasti-filolog-lyudmila-zorina-pyatdesyat-let-issleduet-mestnye-govory/ (accessed 05.05.2026).

15. Markova, N.V. (2020), “Grammatical dialect features of the Zaonezhye dialect”, Proc. of Petrozavodsk State Univ., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 63–71. DOI: 10.15393/uchz.art.2020.434

16. Konkova, O.I. (2009), Izhora. Ocherki istorii i kultury [The Izhorians. Essays on History and Culture], MAE RAS, SPb., RUS.

17. Konkova, O.I. (2009), Vod’. Ocherki istorii i kultury [The Votes. Essays on History and Culture], MAE RAS, SPb., RUS.

18. VADDA, available at: https://www.vadda.ru (accessed 05.05.2026).

19. Muslimov, M.Z. (n. d.), “Ingrian Finnish language”, Minor Languages of Russia. Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, available at https://minlang.iling-ran.ru/lang/ingermanlandskiy-finskiy-yazyk (accessed 05.05.2026).

20. Bakula, V.B. (2018), “Problems of Formation of Literary Language of the Kola Saami”, Finno-Ugric World, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 13–22. DOI: 10.15507/2076-2577.010.2018.03.013-022

21. Boiko, T.P. (n. d.), “Livvi (Olonets) dialect of the Karelian language”, Minor Languages of Russia. Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, available at https://minlang.iling-ran.ru/lang/livvikovskoe-oloneckoe-narechie-karelskogo-yazyka (accessed 05.05.2026).

22. Aibabina, E.A., Beznosikova, L.M., Blokland, R. et al. (n. d.), “Komi-Zyrian language“, Minor Languages of Russia. Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, available at https://minlang.iling-ran.ru/lang/komi-zyryanskiy-yazyk (accessed 05.05.2026).

23. Ricœur, P. (2008), Soi-même comme un autre, Transl. by Skuratov, B.M., Izd-vo gumanitarnoy literatury, Moscow, RUS.

24. Bakhtin, M.M. (1975), “The Problem of Content, Material, and Form in Verbal Art”, Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Questions of Literature and Aesthetics], Khudozhestvennaya literatura, Moscow, USSR, pp. 6–71.

25. Bhabha, H.K. (1994), The Location of Culture, Routledge, London, UK.

26. Medushevskiy, N.A. (2025), “Between Primordialism and constructivism: understanding the concept of ethnos part”, Power, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 228–233. DOI: 10.24412/2071-5358-2025-1-228-233

27. Larionova, M.V. (2024), “Latin American civilizational discourse: toponyms as patterns of cultural identity”, Language and Culture, no. 67, pp. 32–57. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/67/2

28. Zagryazkina, T.Yu. (2024), “Aspects of French identity through the prism of language (using the example of the evolution of the lexemes pays-paysages-terroirs-villages)”, Bulletin of Moscow Univ. Ser. 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 106–123. DOI: 10.55959/MSU-2074-1588-19-27-1-8

29. Bronich, M.K. (2021), “Hybrid identity in the American-Jewish literature”, Izvestiya of Saratov Univ. Philology. Journalism, vol. 21, iss. 4, pp. 454–458. DOI: 10.18500/1817-7115-2021-21-4-454-458

30. Morkina, M.A. (2026), “Dysfunctional fatherhood in cultural liminality narratives: a study of contemporary Swedish literature”, Philology. Theory & Practice, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 300–306. DOI: 10.30853/phil20260041

31. Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2018), “Identity in transitive and virtual space”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Psyсhology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, no. 11 (4), pp. 11–20.

32. Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2015), “History, Culture and Development as a Basis of Historical-Genetic Paradigm”, Cultural-Historical Psychology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 69–78. DOI: 10.17759/chp.2015110406

33. Yasin, M.I. and Ryabichenko, T.A. (2021), “Cognitive predictors of hybrid and alternative identification in multicultural environment: review of foreign studies”, J. of Modern Foreign Psychology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 79–91. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100308