Polycode Strategy in Contemporary Fiction

Introduction. This study offers an analysis of the polycode strategy reperesentation in modern English-language fiction. The article aims at examining polycode strategy as a textual strategy in contemporary fiction. The research focuses on the attempt to investigate the role of implicit and explicit mechanisms of polycode strategy implementation in the works by such writers as Neil Gaiman, Margaret Atwood, Kurt Vonnegut, and Markus Zusak. The relevance of the study is accounted for by the increasing role of polycode strategy in modern fiction; nonetheless, the status of the polycode phenomenon in the semantic structure of a literary text has not been established yet. The article puts forward and proves a hypothesis of the polycode mechanisms used in modern fiction as a text-building strategy. Polycode strategy is implemented by authors of fiction both in its traditional implicit form and in more experimental forms, referred to in the study as an explicit mode of polycode strategy.

Methodology and sources. The methods used in this work include elements of linguosemiotic, cognitive discourse and stylistic analyses. The empirical basis of the work consists of text fragments by contemporary English authors. The research uses the novels by Neil Gaiman, Margaret Atwood, Kurt Vonnegut, and Markus Zusak to showcase a range of polycode mechanisms employed by the writers of the XX–XI centuries.

Results and discussion. The polycode strategy in a literary text could be represented by an author in either an implicit or an explicit form, depending on their choice of bound (verbally) and free semiotic resources. The usage of verbally bound resources, such as font, colour, page design, represents implicit mechanisms of implementing the polycode strategy, whereas the introduction of photographs, diagrams, and figures into a literary text indicates the explicit character of the polycode strategy.

Conclusion. In fiction, polycode strategy is viewed as a text-building strategy implemented in implicit and/or explicit forms. Depending on the interpretation program employed by the author, polycode strategy is expressed in different ways (via semiotically bound and unbound resources, in an implicit or explicit form, respectively), and it also serves a multitude of functions in fiction ensuring its coherence. The research has made an original contribution to Polycode Studies by identifying such textual functions of the polycode strategy as attractive, expressive, characterizing, ludic, and emotive. 

1. Eiger, G.V., and Yukht, V.L. (1974), “To build a typology of texts”, Lingvistika teksta [Linguistics of the text], Materialy nauchnoi konferentsii v MGPIIYa imeni M. Toreza, Part 1, Moscow, USSR, pp. 103–109.

2. Nekrasova, E.D. (2014), “On multimodal perception of the text (a psycholinguistic experiment)”, Tomsk State Univ. J., no. 378, pp. 45–48.

3. Sonin, A.G. (2005), Ponimanie polikodovykh tekstov: kognitivnyi aspekt [Understanding polycode texts: the cognitive aspect], Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, Moscow, RUS.

4. Uvarova, E.A. (2018), “Photomontage as a means of realization of the category of the comic in the polycode text (on the basis of news texts of the web-portal “The Onion”)]”, The Humanities and social sciences, no. 4, pp. 145–153.

5. Chemodurova, Z.M. and Evstigneeva, L.V. (2015), “Multimodality as a Feature of Postmodern Literary Text”, Educatio, no. 7-1 (14), pp. 118–121.

6. Shchirova, I.A., Gurochkina, A.G., Goncharova, E.A. et al. (2023), Ponyat' drugogo: problemy interpretatsii teksta v sovremennoi nauke [Understanding the Other: problems of text interpretation in modern science], Herzen Univ., SPb., RUS.

7. Goncharova, E.A., Il'inova, E.Yu., Karasik, V.I. et al. (2022), “Modern artistic text in the mirror of multimodal stylistics)”, Khudozhestvennyi tekst: formuly smysla [Artistic text: formulas of meaning], FLINTA, Moscow, RUS, pp. 112–143.

8. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2009), Lingvistika teksta: Polikodovost', intertekstual'nost', interdiskursivnost' [Linguistics of the text: Polycode, intertextuality, interdiscursivity], Librokom, Moscow, RUS.

9. Shchirova, I.A. (2013), Tekst skvoz' prizmu slozhnogo [Text through the prism of complex], Politekhnika-servis, SPb., RUS.

10. Dem'yankov, V.Z., Zykova, I.V., Sokolova, O.V. et al. (2021), Lingvokreativnost' v diskursakh raznykh tipov: Predely i vozmozhnosti [Linguocreativity in discourses of different types: limits and possibilities], R. Valent, Moscow, RUS.

11. Polonskiy, A.V., Shatalova, Yu.N., Kryukova, S.V. and Ushakova, S.V. (2023), “Polydiscursivity of the Internet meme as a realization of its linguo-creative potential”, Media Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 209–222. DOI: 10.21638/spbu22.2023.204.

12. Arias, A.M. (2011), “A Policode text as a semiotic-semantic and aesthetic sign unity (using as an example a German caricature)”, Izvestiya SPBGUEF, no. 6, pp. 62–64.

13. Blinova, O.A. (2019), “Magazine Cover as Multimodal Text”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 5, pp. 9–24. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2019-5-9-24.

14. Nesterova, T.V. (2019), “Polycode text as a way of communication”, Chelovek v informatsionnom prostranstve [Man in the information space], in Kuranova, T.P. (ed.), RIO YaGPU, Yaroslavl', RUS, pp. 213–219.

15. Ratsiburskaya, L.V. (2019), “Polycode character in the media creation of words as a means of speech influence”, Proceedings of the V.V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, pp. 215–221.

16. Issers, O.S. (2008), Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech], 5th ed., Izd-vo LKI, Moscow, RUS.

17. Chemodurova, Z.M. (2021), “Visual foregrounding in contemporary fiction”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 2, pp. 5–15. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2021-2-5-15.

18. Jewitt, C. (2009), Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, Routledge, London, UK.

19. Van Leeuwen, T. (2004), Introducing Social Semiotics: An Introductory Textbook, Routledge, London, UK.

20. Hallet, W. (2018), “Reading Multimodal Fiction: A Methodological Approach”, Anglistik: Int. J. of English Studies, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 25–40.

21. Arnol'd, I.V. (2002), Stilistika. Sovremennyi angliiskii yazyk [Stylistics. Modern English], 4th ed., Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

22. Nefedov, S.T. (2022), “Evaluation of relevance in the structure of a multimodal scientific text”, German Philology in St Petersburg State Univ., iss. 12, pp. 116–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2022.106.

23. Melnichuk, O.A. and Melnichuk, T.A. (2013), “Textual Strategies of Fictional Discourse”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 1 (34), pp. 125–135.

24. Gaiman, N. (2017), Norse mythology, W.W. Norton & Company, NY, USA.

25. Gal'perin, I.R. (1958), Ocherki po stilistike angliiskogo yazyka [Essays on the stylistics of the English language], Prosveshchenie, Moscow, USSR.

26. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2023), “Typographic Landscape: Pragmatics of Typographic Variation”, Science J. of VolSU. Linguistics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 89–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.5.6.

27. Atwood, M. (2019), The testaments, 1st ed., Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, NY, USA.

28. Vonnegut, K. (1999), Breakfast of Champions or Goodbye Blue Monday, 12th ed., Dial Press Trade Paperback, NY, USA.

29. Zusak, M. (2005), The book thief, Alfred A. Knopf, NY, USA.

30. Loginova, E.G. (2021), “Semiotic resonance in mono- and polymodal discourse (based on the material of Russian and English drama)”, Dr. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Institute of Linguistics of the RAS, Moscow, RUS.