Stigmatized Labor in the Mirror of Collective Shadow: from Rejection to Integration
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-3-20-28
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the study stems from the need to comprehend labor stigmatization, particularly in the context of “dirty work”, which, despite its social importance, faces devaluation. The aim is to frame stigmatized labor as a metaphor for the collective “Shadow of society”, reflecting repressed aspects of human existence. The scientific novelty lies in integrating Jungian analytical psychology and sociological approaches to analyze stigmatization mechanisms.
Methodology and sources. The research employs Carl Jung’s “Shadow” concept, interpreting stigmatized labor as a projection of the collective unconscious, alongside sociological analysis of empirical data (interviews, observations). The work draws on Everett Hughes’ classification of “dirty work” and modern studies on labor invisibility.
Results and discussion. Patterns of stigmatization linked to the denial of corporeality, vulnerability, and mortality were identified. Professions associated with physical, social, and moral “dirt” become targets for collective fears. The invisibility phenomenon (ignoring, boundary violations) confirms structural inequality and dehumanization.
Conclusion. The study highlights that labor stigmatization stems from the rejection of the collective “Shadow”, leading to social disintegration. Recognizing the value of “dirty work” and integrating repressed aspects are crucial for achieving social integrity and justice.
About the Author
A. K. Shcheglov
Baltic State Technical University «VOENMEH» named after D.F. Ustinov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aleksei K. Shcheglov – Postgraduate at the Department of Philosophy,
1, 1st Krasnoarmeyskaya str., St Petersburg 190005.
References
1. Lovakov, A.V. (2013 ), “Cognitive and Behavioral Strategies in Overcoming Effects of Dirty Work”, Social Psychology and Society, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 153–162.
2. Bosmans, K., Mousaid, S., De Cuyper, N. et al. (2016), “Dirty work, dirty worker? Stigmatisation and coping strategies among domestic workers”, J. of Vocational Behavior, vol. 92, pp. 54–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.008.
3. Jung, C.G. (2019), Die Archetypen und das Kollektive Unbewussten, Transl. by Chechina, A., AST, Moscow, RUS.
4. Donnellon, A., Gray, B. and Bougon, M. (1986), “Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392765.
5. “Existentialism”, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at: https://iep.utm.edu/existent/#SH2a (accessed 27.10.2024).
6. Krongauz, M.A. (2018), “Interview about social taboos”, New Companion, 09.05.2018, available at: https://www.newsko.ru/articles/nk-4851133.html (accessed 27.10.2024).
7. Hughes, E. (1958), Men and Their Work, Free Press, Glencoe, IL, USA.
8. Batista, A.S. and Codo, W. (2018), “Dirty Work and Stigma: Caretakers of Death in Cemeteries”, Revista de Estudios Sociales, no. 63, pp. 72–83. https://doi.org/10.7440/res63.2018.06.
9. Simpson, R., Slutskaya, N., Lewis, S. and Höpful, H. (2012), Dirty Work, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK.
10. Rabelo, V.C. and Mahalingam, R. (2019), ““They really don’t want to see us”: How cleaners experience invisible ‘dirty’ work”, J. of Vocational Behavior, vol. 113, pp. 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.010.
11. Messing, K. (1998), “Hospital trash: Cleaners speak of their role in disease prevention”, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, vol. 12, iss. 2, pp. 168–187. DOI: 10.1525/maq.1998.12.2.168.
12. Yasnikova, E.E. and Tsilli, E.I. (2012), Biologicheskie osnovy lichnosti [Biological foundations of personality], ISMU, Irkutsk, RUS.
Review
For citations:
Shcheglov A.K. Stigmatized Labor in the Mirror of Collective Shadow: from Rejection to Integration. Discourse. 2025;11(3):20-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-3-20-28
Views:
17
Email this article 