Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

How Social Philosophy is Possible: the Transition from Postmodern to Metamodern

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-5-5-14

Abstract

   Introduction. The establishment of the dominance of postmodernism as a key paradigm of philosophical knowledge raised the question of the subject of social philosophy as a philosophical discipline that studies the problems of sociality in relation to a person. On the one hand, this led to a crisis in the social sciences, since social philosophy lost its status as a metascience in the structure of social knowledge. On the other hand, it expanded the subject field of social philosophy, including in it objects to which the interest of social philosophers had never been directed (inanimate objects, animals).

   Methodology and sources. The basis of the methodology of the work is the methods of critical analysis and comparative studies, which allows us to describe the logic of the development of the problem of the loss of the unity of its subject by social philosophy within the framework of events of both real and intellectual history.

   Results and discussion. The article makes an attempt to describe possible transformations of the thematic field of social philosophy in the process of transition from postmodernity to metamodernity. The author, analyzing the recognized problem of modern social philosophy (its fragmentation, the absence of an object of study), demonstrates the possibility of its defragmentation during the metamodern period when research interest is turned to such issues as the study of man as a social being, the influence of new technologies on the transformation of man and the social, the rethinking of the social in the explosive development of technology, and finally, the study of the dialectics of social emotions on society and man.

   Conclusion. The author comes to the conclusion that in its current state, fragmented social philosophy is not ready for subject reorientation, which means the need for qualitative changes in the subject of social philosophy.

About the Author

K. V. Arshin
RAS Institute of Philosophy
Russian Federation

Konstantin V. Arshin, Can. Sci. (Philosophy, 2010), Doctoral Candidate

The author of 74 scientific publications. Area of expertise: social philosophy, nationalism, migration studies, world-systems analysis, neo-marxism

109240; 12 bldg. 1 Goncharnaya str.; St Petersburg



References

1. Ryabov, P.V. (2019), Ehkzistentsializm. Period stanovleniya [Existentialism. Formative period], RIPOL klassik, Moscow, RUS.

2. Nolte, E. (2003), Der europaeische Buergerkrieg 1917–1945. Nationalsozialismus und Bolschewismus, Transl. by Antonovskii, A. et al., Logos, Moscow, RUS.

3. Nisbet, R. (2020), History of the Idea of Progress, Transl. by Kuznetsov, Yu. (ed.), Sotsium, Moscow, RUS.

4. Bauman, Z. (2010), Modernity and the Holocaust, Transl. by Kastal'skii, S. and Rudakov, Evropa, Moscow, RUS.

5. Scott, J. (2005), Seeing Like a State, Transl. by Gusinskii, E.N. and Turchaninova, Yu.I., Universitetskaya kniga, Moscow, RUS.

6. Horkheimer, M. and Adomo, T.W. (1997), Dialektik der Aufklaerung. Philosophische Fragmente, Transl. by Kuznetsov, Medium, Yuventa, Moscow, SPb., RUS.

7. Lyotard, J.-F. (1997), la condition postmoderne, Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris, FRA.

8. Apel, K.-O. (2001), Transformation der Philosophie, Transl. by Kurennoi, V. and Skuratov, B., Logos, Moscow, RUS.

9. Popper, K.R. (2008), Evolutionary epistemology, Transl. by Lachuti, D.G., Editorial URSS, Moscow, RUS.

10. Popper, K.R. (1993), The Poverty of Historicism, Transl. by Kudrina, S.A., Progress, Moscow, RUS.

11. Pavlov, A.V. (2011), “Liberalism and the open society”, Society and power, no. 4, pp. 13–19.

12. Momdzhyan, K.Kh. (2012), “The crisis of fragmentation in modern social philosophy”, Moscow Univ. Bulletin. Series 7. Philosophy, no. 1, pp. 61–71.

13. Mucha, O.Ya. (2012), “Criteria of truthfulness and the scientific quality in post-modern knowledge”, St. Tikhon’s Univ. Review. Ser. I: Theology. Philosophy, no. 39 (1), pp. 58–66.

14. Küster, H. (2018), Geschichte des Waldes. Von der Urzeit bis zur Gegenwart, Transl. by Shtil'mark, N., Izd-vo VShE, Moscow, RUS.

15. Pinker, S. (2021), The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, Transl. by Borodina, G. and Kuznetsova, S., Alpina non-fiction, Moscow, RUS.

16. Latour, B. (2014), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Transl. by Gavrilenko, C., Izd-vo VShE, Moscow, RUS.

17. Harman, G. (2010), Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures, Zero Books, Winchester, UK.

18. DeLanda, M. (2018), A new philosophy of society: The theory of assemblages and social complexity, Transl. by Maiorova, K.S., Gile Press, Perm, RUS.

19. Arshin, K.V. (2020), “The problem of status and subject of social philosophy: current issues”, Izvestiya Tula State Univ. Humanitarian sciences, no. 4, pp. 140–151.

20. Harari, Yu.N. (2022), Ноmo Deus. A Brief History of Tomorrow, Transl. by Andreev, A., Sindbat, Moscow, RUS.

21. Pavlov, A.V. (2019), Postpostmodernizm: kak sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya teorii ob"yasnyayut nashe vremya [Post-Postmodernism: How social and cultural theories explain our time], Delo; Izd-vo RANKhiGS, Moscow, RUS.

22. Elster, J. (1986), “Marxisme et individualisme méthodologique”, Sur l’individualisme. Théories et méthode, Birnbaum, P. and Leca, J. (eds.), Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques, Paris, FRA, pp. 60–76.

23. Urry, J. (2000), Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the twentyfirst century, Routledge, London, UK.

24. Touraine, A. (1987), “La sociologie est-elle encore l’étude de la société?”, Les scientifiques parlent... Jacquard, A., Hachette, Paris, FRA, pp. 189–234.

25. Corey, R. (2007), Fear the history of a political idea, Transl. by Gergiev, A. and Rudakov, M., Territoriya budushchego: Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow, RUS.

26. Schoeck, Н. (2008), Envy. A Theory of Social Behaviour, Transl. by Koshkin, V., IRISEN, Moscow, RUS.

27. Wallerstein, I. (2004), The end of the world as we know it. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century, Transl. by Inozemtsev, V.L., Logos, Moscow, RUS.


Review

For citations:


Arshin K.V. How Social Philosophy is Possible: the Transition from Postmodern to Metamodern. Discourse. 2024;10(5):5-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-5-5-14

Views: 131


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)