Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

The Modification of Mythological Archetypes “son” and “father” in Joyce's Novel “Ulysses”

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130

Abstract

 Introduction. This article delves into the analysis of modifications of mythological and   Christian archetypes in Joyce's work, particularly focusing on the novel “Ulysses” and   examining characters playing familial roles of “son” and “father”. The interest in family ties   is explored considering the atmosphere of creating the novel and biographical aspects.   Family roles are viewed through the modifications of a significant biblical narrative for the   author – the story of the prodigal son. The goal of the analysis was to showcase which vector   the author chose and why to develop this archetypal theme in “Ulysses”. The main role,   adapted to the familial setting through a new interpretation of the parable, was identified   and analyzed as the role of the “prodigal father”.  

 Methodology and sources. The textual analysis in the article was conducted in the   traditions of post-structuralism: additional intertexts were used to augment the familial   relationships of the novel's characters with new meanings.

  Results and discussion. Through the modernization of familial archetypes in the novel, this   article demonstrates how Joyce, as a representative of world literature, treated these   templates. His myth-making involved selectively drawing from source materials that suited   his specific purposes, whether it was the story of Odysseus or the parable of the prodigal   son. He approached the archetypal text liberally, using it as a systematizing mechanism to   elevate contemporary issues to a more universal level.  

 Conclusion. The article sequentially examines canonical archetypal roles and various   possible readings of the source text, influenced by the author's personal experiences   (biographical) as well as the cultural-historical context, shifting peripheral components of   the parable to dominant positions. 

About the Author

N. A. Karlik
Dimitrovgrad Engineering and Technological Institute of the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI
Russian Federation

Nadezhda A. Karlik – Dr. Sci. (Philology, 2013), Docent (2004), Professor at the Department of Jurisprudence

 294 Kuibyshev str., Dimitrovgrad, Ulyanovsk region 433511


The author of 59 scientific publications. Area of expertise: cognitive linguistics, rhetoric, methodology of teaching communication disciplines, Russian literature, Irish literature, French literature, poetic of literary text, comparativistics. 



References

1. Joyce, Ja. (2019), Ulysses, in 2nd vol., vol. 1, Transl. by Khoruzhii, S.S., АSТ, Moscow, RUS.

2. Joyce, Ja. (2019), Ulysses, in 2nd vol., vol. 2, Transl. by Khoruzhii, S.S., АSТ, Moscow, RUS.

3. Karlik, N.A. (2018), “Intertextual Links of A. Nothomb’s Novel “Sweet Nostalgia””, Verhnevolzhski Philological Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 177–184. DOI: 10.24411/2499-9679-2018-10048.

4. Karlik, N.A. (2019), “Amelie Nothomb’s contribution to literary imagology, or its own “alien” Japan”, Homo loquens: yazyk i kul'tura. Dialog kul'tur v usloviyakh otkrytogo mira [Homo loquens: language and culture. Dialogue of cultures in an open world], SPb., RUS, April 16, 2019, iss. 4., pp. 45–53.

5. Denisova, G.V. (2003), V mire interteksta: yazyk, pamyat', perevod [In the world of intertext: language, memory, translation], Azbukovnik, Moscow, RUS.

6. Barthes, R. (1975), Le Degré zéro de récriture, suivi de Cléments de sémiologie, Transl. by Kosikov, G.K., Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv” [Structuralism: “pros” and “cons”], Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 114–163.

7. Kristeva, Ju. (2013), Sèméiotikè. Recherches pour une sémanalyse, Transl. by Orlova, E.A., Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, RUS.

8. Goldenberg, A.Kh. (2012), Arkhetipy v poehtike N. V. Gogolya [Archetypes in the poetics of N. V. Gogol], Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

9. Kubatiev, A. (2011), Dzhois [Joyce], Molodaya gvardiya, Moscow, RUS.

10. Zhilina, N.P. and Zhilina-Els, T. (2021), “The evolution of Stephen Dedalus’ worldview in James Joyce’s “A portrait of the artist as a young man””, The New Philological Bulletin, no. 3 (58), pp. 367–381. DOI: 10.54770/20729316_2021_3_367.

11. Shulz, S.A. (2020), “L.N. Tolstoy, I.A. Bunin, J. Joyce: the modes of continuity”, Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal, no. 1 (47), pp. 20–38. DOI: 10.31249/litzhur/2020.47.02.

12. Wu, Xianyou (2011), “The Poetics of Foregrounding: The Lexical Deviation in Ulysses”, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1176–1184. DOI: 10.4304/tpls.1.9.1176-1184.

13. Rozanov, V.V. (1913), Lyudi lunnogo sveta. Metafizika khristianstva [People of the Moonlight. Metaphysics of Christianity], 2nd ed., SPb., RUS.

14. Rooney, S. (2022), “Misreading Ulysses”, The Paris Review, 07.12.2022, available at: https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2022/12/07/misreading-ulysses/ (accessed 17.11.2023).

15. McCrea, В. (2009), “Family and form in Ulysses“, Field Day Review, vol. 5, pp. 74–93.

16. Stepura, S.N. (2020), “Translational ingenuity vs James Joyce's language play: based on the translations of episode eight of Ulysses (1920s-1930s)”, Tomsk State Univ. J., no. 454, pp. 37–44. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/454/5.

17. Trotta, Jo. (n.d.), Creativity, playfulness and linguistic carnivalization in James Joyce’s Ulysses, available at: https://www.academia.edu/8402289/Creativity_Playfulness_and_Linguistic_Carnivalization_in_James_Joyces_Ulysses (accessed 17.11.2023).

18. Nabokov, V.V. (1998), Lectures on Literature, Transl. by Kharitonov, V.A. (ed.), Nezavisimaya Gazeta, Moscow, RUS.

19. Bertolini, C.D. (2008), ”Bloom’s death in “Ithaca,” or the End of Ulysses”, J. of Modern Literature, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 39–52.

20. Freud, S. (2019), Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse, Transl. by Baryshnikova, G.V., AST, Moscow, RUS.

21. Joyce, Ja. (2000), Dubliners, Transl. by Bogoslovskaya, M.P., Olma-Press, Moscow, RUS.

22. Morrissey, T. (2022), Joyce’s Ulysses as a Catalog of Narrative Techniques for MFA Candidates, 22.02.2022, available at: https://tedmorrissey.blog/2022/02/22/joyces-ulysses-as-a-catalog-of-narrative-techniques-for-mfa-candidates/ (accessed 17.11.2023).

23. Lukács, G. (1971), Realism in our time: literature and class struggle, Trans. by J. & N. Mander, Harper & Row, NY, USA.

24. Al-Moosawi, Н. (2022), Intertextuality in James Joyce's Ulysses, available at: https://www.Researchgate.net/publication/363539761_Intertextuality_in_James_Joyce%27s_Ulysses (accessed 17.11.2023).

25. Genieva, E.Yu. (2011), I snova Dzhois… [And Joyce again...], Tsentr knigi Rudomino, Moscow, RUS.


Review

For citations:


Karlik N.A. The Modification of Mythological Archetypes “son” and “father” in Joyce's Novel “Ulysses”. Discourse. 2024;10(2):117-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-117-130

Views: 239


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)