Altruism in the interpretation of Russian religious philosophy
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-18-28
Abstract
Introduction. A number of Orthodox philosophers, among them K.N. Leontiev, criticized New European altruism, and N.A. Berdyaev generally rejected it, calling it “the teaching of bourgeois-democratic morality, the middle-general morality of well-being, the morality of quantities”. P.A. Florensky, N.O. Lossky, V.S. Soloviev, on the contrary, called altruism active love and Christian agape. L.N. Tolstoy believed that the good of people lies in unity and solidarity, and F.M. Dostoevsky called for active and selfless love, which is capable of transforming and purifying. This position of Russian religious philosophers arouses research interest in the author of the article. Thus, the purpose of the work is to conduct a comparative analysis of a number of concepts of Orthodox thinkers who interpreted the concept of altruism differently, but at the same time expressed similar opinions in relation to this ethical category.
Methodology and sources. The author uses the hermeneutic method, which allows one to immerse oneself in the study and interpretation of the texts of Russian religious philosophers, which helps to create a voluminous hermeneutic circle of Russian culture, highlighting its features.
Results and discussions. The author's approach to the study of culture and interpretation of cultural meanings through the analysis of ethical categories can be called original. A similar approach may be useful to researchers in the field of cultural philosophy as a possible method when studying a particular sociocultural system. Analyzing the concepts of Russian religious philosophers using a similar method helps the author highlight the value foundations of Russian culture.
Conclusion. Altruism as a cultural phenomenon and ethical category, once on the soil of Russian culture, acquires a completely different meaning and fullness.
Keywords
Altruism,
Russian religious philosophy,
love,
active love,
Christian agape,
Soloviev,
Lossky,
Florensky,
Berdyaev,
Fedorov,
Sorokin,
Tolstoy,
Dostoevsky
About the Author
T. A. Skoropad
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Skoropad – Postgraduate at the Department of Russian Philosophy and Culture
7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034
The author of 5 scientific publications. Area of expertise: altruism as a universal cultural meaning, postmodernism and consumer society, advertising as a language of communication, intercultural communications, Russian philology.
References
1. Sorokin, P.A. (1992), А Long Journey. The Autobiography of Pitirim A. Sorokin, Transl. by Lipskii. A.V., Terra, Moscow, RUS.
2. Soloviev, V.S. (1988), “Justification of good. Moral philosophy”, Sochineniya [Works], in 2 vol., vol. 1, Mysl', Moscow, USSR, pp. 47–548.
3. Guseinov, A.A. (1974), Sotsial'naya priroda nravstvennosti [Social nature of morality], Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, Moscow, USSR,
4. Guseinov, A.A. and Apresyan, R.G. (2007), “Moral experience”, Ehtika [Ethics], Gardariki, Moscow, RUS, pp. 245–312.
5. Shestakov, V.P. (1996), “Sergei Bulgakov. Gift of love”, Ehros i kul'tura: filosofiya lyubvi i evropeiskoe iskusstvo [Eros and culture: philosophy of love and European art], available at: http://lit.lib.ru/s/shestakow_w_p/text_0010.shtml#72 (accessed 28.11.2023).
6. Florenskii, P.A. (1990), Stolp i utverzhdenie istiny [The pillar and affirmation of truth], Pravda, Moscow, USSR.
7. Lossky, N.O. (1991), Usloviya absolyutnogo dobra: osnovy ehtiki. Kharakter russkogo naroda [Conditions of absolute good: foundations of ethics. The character of the Russian people], Politizdat, Moscow, RUS.
8. Lossky, N.O. (1958), Dostoevskii i ego khristianskoe miroponimanie [Dostoyevsky and his Christian World Concept], Izd-vo im. Chekhova, NY, USA.
9. Berdyaev, M.A. (1989), Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [Philosophy of freedom. The meaning of creativity], Pravda, Moscow, USSR.
10. Berdyaev, N.A. (1995), Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo Kesarya [The kingdom of the spirit and the kingdom of Caesar], Respublika, Moscow, RUS.
11. Fedorov, N.F. (1903), Ni ehgoizm, ni al'truizm, a rodstvo! [Neither selfishness nor altruism, but kinship!], available at: http://db.rgub.ru/classics/f/fedorow_n_f/text_0550.shtml (accessed 29.11.2023).
12. Fedorov, N.F. (1995), Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works], in 4 vol., vol. II, Progress, Moscow, RUS.
13. Sorokin, P.A. (2015), “Ways and power of love”, Human Being, no. 4, pp. 96–113.
14. Tolstoi, L.N. (2018), Narodnye rasskazy [Folk stories], Umozrenie, SPb., RUS.
15. Biryukov, P.I. (2000), Biografiya L.N. Tolstogo [Biography of L. N. Tolstoy], Algoritm, Moscow, RUS.
16. Tolstoi, L.N. (1956), “The Path of Life”, Polnoe sobr. soch. [Complete Works], vol. 45, GIHL, Moscow, USSR.
17. Dostoevskii, F.M. (1991), Brat'ya Karamazovy [Brothers Karamazov], in 4 parts, part 2, Moscow, RUS.
18. Dostoevskii, F.M. (1973), “Crime and Punishmen”, Polnoe sobr. soch. [Complete Works], in 30 vols., vol. 6, Bazanov, V.G., Priima, F.Ya., Fridlender, G.M. at al. (eds.), Leningrad, Nauka, USSR.
19. Dostoevskii, F.M. (1976), “Brothers Karamazov”, vol. 1, Polnoe sobr. soch. [Complete Works], in 30 vols., vol. 14, Bazanov, V.G., Priima, F.Ya., Fridlender, G.M. at al. (eds.), Leningrad, Nauka, USSR.
20. Flier, A. (2016), “Social Reality Culturological Interpretation”, Herald of the Chelyabinsk State Academy of Culture and Arts, no. 3 (47), pp. 39–46.
Review
For citations:
Skoropad T.A. Altruism in the interpretation of Russian religious philosophy. Discourse. 2024;10(2):18-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-2-18-28
Views:
266
Email this article 