Professional Gender Segregation in Scientific Discourse: Trends and Contradiction

Introduction. The article examines current ideas about professional gender segregation in Russian and foreign scientific discourses. Comparative analysis of various approaches to understanding gender issues allows us to identify new potentials for their study, as well as to pay attention to the development of the optics of Russian science in considering gender differences. Gender issues in the field of information technology require the closest attention and study, since this area is at the forefront of scientific, technological and social development.

Methodology and sources. The theoretical and methodological basis for interpreting the results of the study was the main provisions of sociological and economic theories: the theory of social representations (S. Moscovici), the concept of habitus (P. Bourdieu), role theory (R. Linton), and rational choice theory. To work with empirical data, we used the methods of comparative text analysis, analysis of documents and research reports (The Gender Inequality Index, The Global Gender Gap Index, Global Gender Gap Report, “Women and Men of Russia-2022”), and discourse analysis.

Results and discussion. In foreign studies, with the long-established vision and acceptance of gender problems, there is an understanding that past steps to achieve gender parity in the labor market lead to a new configuration of gender differences, which requires new efforts to eliminate them. In Russian scientific literature, the main emphasis is on monitoring the current situation of women in the professional environment, analyzing statistics and searching for hidden mechanisms of professional gender segregation.

Conclusion. The results of the analysis show that in the presence of demonstrative statistics and large-scale empirical research, there is no theoretical consensus in the scientific discourse about the professional gender situation. There is a clear dissonance between the statement of problems by theorists and the lack of a request to find their solution on the part of practice, where gender “neutrality” or “indifference” reigns in some professional contexts. Conclusions are drawn about the nature of the Russian scientific gender discourse, which needs to develop a thesaurus of nonbinarity and develop an effective way of reasoning about gender issues.

1. Charles, M. and Bradley, K. (2002), “Equal but Separate? A Cross-National Study of Sex Segregation in Higher Education”, American Sociological Review, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 573–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088946.

2. Bourdieu, P. (1979), Le Sens pratique, Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris, FRA.

3. Barone, C. (2011), “Some Things Never Change: Gender Segregation in Higher Education across Eight Nations and Three Decades”, Sociology of Education, vol. 84, iss. 2, pp. 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711402099.

4. Correll, S.J. (2001), “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments”, American J. of Sociology, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 1691–1730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321299.

5. Froehlich, L., Olsson, M.I.T., Dorrough, A.R. and Martiny, S.E., (2020), “Gender at Work Across Na-tions: Men and Women Working in Male-Dominated and Female-Dominated Occupations are Differentially Associated with Agency and Communion”, J. of Social Issues, vol. 76, iss. 3, pp. 484–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12390.

6. Linton, R. (1936), The study of a man: an introduction, Appleton-Century, NY, USA.

7. Cejka, M.A. and Eagly, A.H. (1999), “Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 25, iss. 4, pp. 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025004002.

8. Blackburn, R.M., Browne, J., Brooks, B. and Jarman, J. (2002), “Explaining gender segregation”, The British J. of Sociology, vol. 53, iss. 4, pp. 513–536. Https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131022000021461.

9. Hakim, C. (1998), “Developing a Sociology for the Twenty-First Century: Preference Theory”, The British J. of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 137–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/591267.

10. Vorobyeva, A.G. (2018), “A sociological analysis of the problematic status of occupational gender segregation in Russia”, Theory and Practice of Social Development, no. 8, pp. 56–59. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2018.8.10.

11. Zhenshchiny i muzhchiny Rossii [Women and men of Russia] (2022), Rosstat, Moscow, RUS.

12. Zhenshchiny v professiyah XXI veka: tendencii, problemy, perspektivy [Women in professions of the 21st century: trends, problems, prospects] (2020), Ivanovo, RUS, March 3, 2020.

13. Zadvornova, Yu.S. (2019), “Elimination of gender wage gap in stem as a key task of eradication of gender inequality in countries with digital economy”, Woman in Russian Society, no. 3, pp. 114–120. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2019.3.9.

14. Lukyanova, A.L. (2021), “Digitalization and the Gender Wage Gap in Russia”, Economic policy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 88–117. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2021-2-88-117.

15. Zaichenko, N.A. and Savelyeva, E.A. (2020), “Gender Discourse in the Perceptions of Educational Relations Participants in the St. Petersburg”, Schools. Interaction. Interview. Interpretation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 50–74. DOI: 10.19181/inter.2020.12.3.3.

16. Khotkina, Z.A. (2020), “Actual challenges of labor market and their gender implications for employment”, Narodonaselenie [Population], vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 136–148. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.2.12.

17. Rudchenko, A.V. (2020), “Analysis of situation of gender asymmetry in the labour market”, Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta rynka, no. 2, pp. 44–53.

18. Roshchin, S.Yu. and Emelina, N.K. (2022), “Meta-analysis of the Gender Pay Gap in Russia”, HSE Economic J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 213–239. DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2022-26-2-213-239.

19. Maltseva, I. and Nesterova, D. (2009), Within-Firm Gender Segregation: sources and consequences, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RUS.

20. Rudchenko, A.V. and Astashina, E.E. (2021), “Gender analysis of the official structure of Universities in Russia”, Vestnik Mezhdunarodnogo instituta rynka, no. 1, pp. 111–119.

21. Sheltzer, J.M. and Smith, J.C. (2014), “Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women”, PNAS, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 10107–10112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403334111.

22. Khotkina, Z.A., Dobrohleb, V.G. and Rusanova, N.E. (2018), “Gender problems in Russia and methodology of their analysis”, Narodonaselenie [Population], vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 135–149. DOI: 10.26653/1561-7785-2018-21-4-12.