Everyday Corruption Practices of Young People in Argentina and Russia: the Experience of Comparative Analysis
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-5-59-74
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the topic is conditioned by the complexity and multidimensionality of the phenomenon of corruption and its negative impact on all aspects of modern society. The literature review shows that corruption has been analyzed from different angles, although no comparisons were found between countries such as Russia and Argentina. The comparison of corrupt behavior in these two societies presents academic interest because they share common features, do not belong to liberal-Western countries, but at the same time differ greatly in such factors as economic and political stability.
Methodology and sources. From the theoretical and methodological point of view, the research is based on the scientific works of R. Merton, P. Bourdieu and M. Zaloznaya devoted to the issues of deviant behavior, motivation of action, practical sense and corrupt behavior. This article identifies, analyzes and compares corrupt behaviors in everyday life in Russia and Argentina, based on data provided by Russian and Argentinean young people in virtual interviews conducted in 2020 (N25) and in focus groups (N2) implemented before the pandemic, and media materials. Atlas-ti qualitative data analysis program is used.
Results and discussion. In Argentina, corrupt behavior is highlighted to improve material living conditions in the context of constraints and in relation to institutions, Argentines mention more the police. While in Russia it is more related to the purpose of speeding up time, getting better services, graduating or avoiding a change of life project. Regarding institutions, universities and hospitals are mentioned.
Conclusion. The study shows that neither in Russia nor in Argentina can the logic of corrupt behavior be reduced to the logic of economic behavior, as there are different motives, such as fear, custom, and assertion of right. The idea that certain situations are solved by money is widespread among young people in both societies.
About the Authors
I. A. Morayta
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Isabel Antonieta Morayta – Postgraduate (Sociology of Management)
7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034
N. A. Pruel
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolai A. Pruel – Dr. Sci. (Sociology, 2003), Docent (2015), Professor at the Department of Social Administration and Planning
7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034
References
1. Leff, N.H. (1964), “Economic development through bureaucratic corruption”, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 8–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000276426400800303.
2. Leys, C. (1965), “What is the problem about corruption?”, The J. of Modern African Studies, vol. 3, iss. 2, pp. 215–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00023636.
3. Huntington, S. (1968), Political order in changing societies, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, USA.
4. Nye, J.S. (1967), “Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis”, American Political Science Review, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 417–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1953254.
5. Becker, G.S. and Stigler, G.J. (1974), “Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers”, The J. of Legal Studies, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/467507.
6. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1975), “The Economics of Corruption”, J. of Public Economics, vol. 4, iss. 2, pp. 187–203. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(75)90017-1.
7. Aidt, T.S. (2011), “The causes of corruption”, CESifo DICE Report, vol. 9, iss. 2, pp. 15–19.
8. Ades, A. and Di Tella, R. (1997), “The new economics of corruption: A survey and some new results”, Political Studies, vol. 45, iss. 3, pp. 496–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00093.
9. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1993) “Corruption”, The Quarterly J. of Economics, vol. 108, iss. 3, pp. 599–617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118402.
10. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001), “Trust, honesty and corruption: Reflection on the state-building process”, European J. of Sociology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 526–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975601001084.
11. Mauro, P. (1997), “Why worry about corruption?”, Economic Issues, no. 6, pp. 1–19.
12. Gray, C.W. and Kaufman, D. (1998), “Corruption and development”, Finance & Development, March, pp. 7–10.
13. Barr, A. and Serra, D. (2010), “Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis”, J. of Public Economics, vol. 94, iss. 11–12, pp. 862–869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.006.
14. Paldam, M. (2001), “Corruption and religion adding to the economic model”, Kyklos, vol. 54, iss. 2–3, pp. 383–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00160.
15. Treisman, D. (2000), “The causes of corruption: A cross-national study”, J. of Public Economics, vol. 76, iss. 3, pp. 399–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4.
16. Sandholtz, W. and Koetzle, W. (2000), “Accounting for corruption: Economic structure, democracy, and trade”, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 31–50. DOI: 10.1111/00208833.00147.
17. Boniolo, P. (2010), “La trama de corrupción: un estudio en la clase media y la clase trabajadora de Buenos Aires”, Revista Mexicana de Sociología, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 365–391. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iis.01882503p.2010.003.21486.
18. Corral, D. (2014), “En torno a la política como ‘problema moral’: el clivaje corrupciónanticorrupción como principio de diferenciación política en la centroizquierda de los noventa”, Trabajo y Sociedad, no. 22, pp. 447–459.
19. Sautú, R. et al. (2005), “Corrupción y democracia en la Argentina: La interpretación de los estudiantes universitarios”, Revista Argentina de Sociología, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 9–31.
20. Biscay, P. (2008), “Corrupción y criminalidad económica. Enfoques y problemas sociológicos para el Estado y la democracia”, Delito y Sociedad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, no. 26, pp. 59–80. DOI: 10.14409/dys.v2i26.5296.
21. Canelo, P. and Castellani, A. (2016), “Perfil sociológico de los miembros del gabinete inicial del presidente Mauricio Macri”, Observatorio de elites argentinas de la Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), no. 1, pp. 1–37.
22. Morayta, I.A. (2020), “Relaciones entre elites: captura política y corrupción. El caso de Argentina (2015-2019)”, Iberoamérica, no. 4, pp. 162–183. DOI: 10.37656/s20768400-2020-4-07.
23. Canelo, P. and Castellani, A. (2017), “Puerta giratoria, conflictos de interés y captura de la decisión estatal en el gobierno de Macri. El caso Del Ministerio de Energía y Minería de la Nación”, Observatorio de elites argentinas de la Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM), no. 2, pp. 1–26.
24. Castellani, A. (2018), “Lobbies y puertas giratorias. Los riesgos de la captura de la decisión pública”, Nueva Sociedad, no. 276, pp. 48–61.
25. Ferguson, R.T. (2015), “The effects of gender on corruption in Latin America”, 17th Annual Summer Fellows Symposium, Ursinus College, July 24, Pennsylvania, USA. 26. Gudynas, E. (2017), “Extractivismos y corrupción en América Del Sur. Estructuras, dinámicas y tendencias en una íntima relación”, RevIISE: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 73–87.
26. Míguez, D. and Dewey, M. (2018), “The conditions of socioeconomic development exploring the legitimacy of social norms, trust, and corruption in Chile and Argentina”, MPIfG Discussion Paper, no. 8, pp. 1–25.
27. Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2012), “Corruption and informal practices in Russia”, Euxeinos, no. 7, pp. 3–19.
28. Osipov, G.V., Glotov, V.I. and Karepova, S.G. (2018), “Population in the shadow market: Petty corruption and unpaid taxes”, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 692–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.2(16).
29. Sidorenko, E.L. (2017), “Condition and Dynamics of Petty Corruption in the Russian Federation”, J. of Russian Law, vol. 246, no. 6, pp. 154–167. DOI: 10.12737/article_59240d4b35c386.05320634.
30. Medzhidov, I.S. (2016), “Specificity the manifestations everyday corruption”, Gaps in Russian Legislation, no. 2, pp. 151–153.
31. Denisova-Schmidt, E. (2016), “Corruption in Russian higher education”, Russian Analytical Digest, no. 191, pp. 3–59.
32. Osipian, A.L. (2012), “Education corruption, reform, and growth: Case of Post-Soviet Russia”, J. of Eurasian Studies, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 20–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2011.10.003.
33. Tereshkova, V.V. (2015), ”Comparative analysis of successful practices of corruption counteraction in the sphere of school education in foreign countries”, Actual problems of economics and law, no. 1, pp. 262–271.
34. Fedotov, D.Yu. (2019), “The level of corruption in Russia in comparison with foreign countries”, Shadow Economy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–32. DOI: 10.18334/tek.3.1.39949.
35. Beesley, C. (2015), “Globalization and corruption in post-Soviet countries: perverse effects of economic openness”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 56, iss. 2, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2015.1082923.
36. Ledeneva, A.V. (2013), “A critique of the global corruption ‘paradigm’”, in Kubik, J. and Linch, A. (eds.), Postcommunism from Within: Social Justice, Mobilization, and Hegemony, New York Univ. Press, NY, USA, pp. 297–332.
37. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2006), “Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment”, J. of Democracy, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 86–99.
38. Merton, R. (1995), Teoría y estructura sociales, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, MEX.
39. Bourdieu, P. (2007), El sentido práctico, Siglo XXI Editores Argentina, Buenos Aires, ARG.
40. Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (1995), Una invitación a la sociología reflexiva, Siglo XXI Editores Argentina, Buenos Aires, ARG.
41. Bourdieu, P. (1997), Razones prácticas, Anagrama, Barcelona, ESP.
42. Zaloznaya, M. (2013), “Beyond anti-corruptionism: Sociological imagination and comparative study of corruption”, Comparative Sociology, vol. 12, iss. 5, pp. 705–751. DOI: 10.1163/1569133012341281.
43. Zmanovskaya, А. (2016), “A quarter of Russian students take bribes during their studies at universities”, Izvestia, 17.02.2016, available at: https://iz.ru/news/604331 (accessed 20.01.2022).
44. Cabreros, D. (2015), “Crisis, denuncias y renuncias en la UBA”, Página 12, 19.05.2015, available at: https://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/universidad/10-272997-2015-05-19.html (accessed 20.01.2022).
45. Talice, D. and Hof, M. (2015), “Quién es José Luis Giusti, el decano PRO de Económicas que renunció?”, La Izquierda Diario, 23.04.2015, available at: https://www.laizquierdadiario.com/Quien-esJose-Luis-Giusti-el-decano-PRO-de-Economicas-que-renuncio (accessed 21.01.2022).
46. “Índice de confianza en instituciones” (2016), Consejo Económico y Social de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires, available at: http://www.bdigital.cesba.gob.ar/handle/123456789/313 (accessed 21.01.2022).
47. “Fallo Arriola. Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación” (2009), available at: http://www.saij.gob.ar/corte-suprema-justicia-nacion-federal-ciudad-autonoma-buenos-aires-arriola-sebastian-otrosrecurso-hecho-causa-9080-fa09000059-2009-08-25/123456789-950-0009-0ots-eupmocsollaf (accessed 20.01.2022).
48. “Violencia policial”, CELS, available at: https://violenciapolicial.org.ar/violencia-policial/ (accessed 21.12.2021).
49. “Amnistía Internacional relevó más de 30 casos de violencia institucional en Argentina”, (2020), Amnistía Internacional, 11.08.2020, available at: https://amnistia.org.ar/amnistia-internacionalrelevo-mas-de-30-casos-violencia-institucional-en-argentina/ (accessed 29.12.2021).
50. “Registro de expulsados de la Policía bonaerense” (2021), Ministerio de Seguridad de la provincia de Buenos Aires, available at: https://www.mseg.gba.gov.ar/areas/asuntosinternos/index.html (accessed 29.12.2021).
51. “Informe Anual” (2021), Latinbarómetro, available at: https://www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp (accessed 21.01.2022).
52. Morayta, I.A. (2022), “Los jóvenes y la corrupción: un análisis comparado de las percepciones en Rusia y Argentina”, Iberoamérica, no. 4, pp. 162–183. DOI: 10.37656/s20768400-2022-4-08.
Review
For citations:
Morayta I.A., Pruel N.A. Everyday Corruption Practices of Young People in Argentina and Russia: the Experience of Comparative Analysis. Discourse. 2023;9(5):59-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-5-59-74
Views:
173
Email this article 