Social Relations of IT Professionals with Other Professional Groups: Network Modeling and Results of Empirical Analysis

Introduction. The relationship of IT specialists to representatives of other professional groups is built in different ways – from cooperation to conflicts. The important practical significance of the analysis of this problem actualizes the development of theoretical and methodological foundations for the study and diagnosis of relations between IT specialists and representatives of other socio-professional groups based on an appeal to values. This is important for a holistic understanding of the trends in the development of the social structure of modern society.

Methodology and sources. The multi-paradigm platform of work is formed on the ideas of two directions. Firstly, the fundamental principles of the theory of P.A. Sorokin on the sociodynamics of values in the process of social development are used; the ideas of D.A. Leontiev on the connections of individual and group values; approaches to the construction of methodological procedures for diagnosing values, set out in the works of V.A. Yadov and N.I. Lapin. Another part of the study is formed on the provisions M. Grannoweter’s theory of the strength of weak ties. The methodological procedure of the study is based on the technologies for assessing the relevance of professions proposed by J. Holland.

Results and discussion. On the basis of network models of relations between IT specialists, it is shown that interaction with professionals of various professional groups is carried out in different ways. The professional groups with which IT specialists develop tense relations are shown, which is due to the specifics of their professional competencies. The sociodynamics of changes in professional values is revealed as the status and role positions of IT specialists change.

Conclusion. The conducted research shows that the attitudes of IT specialists to actors of other professional groups of external social interaction are built inconsistently and ambiguously. Relationships between IT professionals and other professions are formed more like relationships oriented towards different values and variables. In this sense, a group of IT professionals can be perceived as a special case. Unlike relationships within the group of IT professionals themselves, relationships with professionals of other specialties are predominantly situational in nature and are more likely determined by some specific conditions and circumstances, specific people and specific factors than by the unity or solidarity of professional values and interests.

1. Fomichyova, T.V. and Katayeva, V.I. (2019), “Russian Values in the Context of Digitalization of the Russian Economy”, Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 80–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/1999-9836-2019-10067.

2. Begin, A. (2023), “Statistics of the outflow of IT specialists from Russia in 2023”, Inclient, 09.02.2023, available at: https://inclient.ru/outflow-it-specialists/ (accessed 15.02.2023).

3. Patrakova, A. (2022), “Named the 20 richest IT people in Russia”, Cnews, 10.08.2022, available at: https://www.cnews.ru/news/top/2022-08-10_bogatejshimi_it-shnikami_v (accessed 15.02.2023).

4. Zhuravlev, K. (2022), “Russia needs IT specialists more than ever”, Gazeta.ru, 12.04.2022, available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2022/04/12_a_14727050.shtml (accessed 15.02.2023).

5. Yarmak, O.V., Deryugin, P.P. and Yarmak, V.E. (2019), “Social Portrait of a Modern Student”, DISCOURSE, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 53–64. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-4-53-64.

6. Mokeicheva, M. (2022), “We need more, but better: how many and what kind of IT specialists are actually lacking in Russia”, Fontanka.ru, 11.08.2022, available at: https://www.fontanka.ru/2022/08/11/71561588/ (accessed 15.02.2023).

7. “Simple IT specialist”, Dzen.ru, available at: https://dzen.ru/prostoiaitishnik (accessed 15.02.2023).

8. Strashko, E.V., Yarmak, O.V., Deryugin, P.P. et al. (2021), “Measuring the human capital of regions with world-class scientific and educational centers: factor analysis of their investment attractiveness”, Russian J. of Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 171–175. DOI: 10.29039/2409-6024-2021-9-1-171-175.

9. Veselov, Yu.V. (2020), “Trust in a digital society”, Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg Univ. Sociology, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 129–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.202.

10. Rasskazov, S.V., Rasskazova, A.N. and Deryugin, P.P. (2020), Korporativnoe upravlenie: uchebnik [Corporate governance: textbook], INFRA-M, Moscow, RUS. DOI: 10.12737/1022769.

11. Lapin, N.I. (2011), “Sociocultural factors of Russian stagnation and modernization”, Sociological Studies, no. 9, pp. 3–18.

12. Kozina, I.M. and Vinogradova, E.V. (2016), “Young engineers: work values and professional identity”, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Change, no. 1, pp. 215–230. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2016.1.08.

13. Koch, I.A. and Orlov, V.A. (2020), “Values and professional identity of student-age population”, The Education and Science J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 143–170. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-2-143-170.

14. Khaet, I. “New values and consumption patterns in digital transformation”, Cnews, available at: https://club.cnews.ru/blogs/entry/novye_tsennosti_i_modeli_potrebleniya_pri_tsifrovoj_transformatsii (accessed 19.03.2023).

15. Sorokin, P.A. (1992), “Integralism is my philosophy”, Sociological Studies, no. 10, pp. 134–139.

16. Lukyanov, V.G. (2012), “The methodology of scientific study and the theory of value in Pitirim Sorokin's works”, Moscow State Univ. Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, no. 1, pp. 182–194.

17. Leontiev, D.A. (1998), “Value representations in individual and group consciousness: types, determinants, changes in time”, Psikhologicheskoe obozrenie [Psychological Review], no. 1, pp. 13–25.

18. Magun, V.S. and Rudnev, M.G. (2010), Basic values-2008: similarities and differences between Russians and other Europeans, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, RUS.

19. Aminov, S.R. (2009), “Empirical sociological approach to the analysis of values”, Sistema tsennostei sovremennogo obshchestva [System of values of modern society], no. 7, pp. 116–120.

20. Prihozhy, A.A. and Zhdanouski, A.M. (2018), “Method of qualification estimation and optimization of professional teams of programmers”, System analysis and applied information science, no. 2, pp. 4–11.

21. Granovetter, M. (2009), “The strength of weak ties”, J. of economic sociology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 31–50.

22. Kurkina, E.S. and Knyazeva, E.N. (2017), “The methodology of the network analysis of social structures“, Philosophy of science and technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 120–135.

23. Crownover, R.M. (2000), Introduction to Fractals and Chaos, Transl. by Krenkel, T.E. and Soloveichik, A.L., in Krenkel, T.E. (ed.), Postmarket, Moscow, RUS.

24. Seifullaev, R.B. (2016), “The speed of dissemination and perception of information”, Vestnik magistratury, no. 6-2 (57), pp. 35–38.

25. Voronkin, A.S. (2014), “Social networks: evolution, structure, analysis”, Educational technology & society, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 650–675.

26. Pouzanov, K.A. (2012), “Present day models of innovation distribution: critical analysis”, Sociology of power, no. 6–7, pp. 82–99.

27. Shaev, Yu.M. (2018), “Information redundancy and digital detox in the context of communication ontology”, Humanitarian vector, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 23–28.

28. Savchenko, D.V. (2014), “Social groups in the structure of society: theoretical concepts and management models”, Society and Law, no. 3 (49), pp. 292–296.

29. “Test by J. Holland (modified by G.V. Rezapkina)”, Resurrection College, available at: восколледж.рф/files/0001/Методика%20Голланда.pdf (accessed 19.03.2023).

30. “Holland model test”, Psychological tests online, available at: https://psytests.org/typo/riasecA-run.html (accessed 19.03.2023).