Scientific Discourse: Evolution of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches and Concepts

Introduction. The article presents the results of an analytical review of scientific papers reflecting the stages of formation and development of the theory of scientific discourse in Russian linguistics. The purpose of the article is to systematize and critically analyze approaches, concepts and methodological principles of the study of scientific communication in the aspect of its communicative-pragmatic, genre-stylistic, linguocognitive and linguocultural specifics.

Methodology and sources. The paper is based on theoretical concepts in the field of discourse analysis, considering discourse as a type of social practice, as a methodology of corpus linguistics using software tools and quantitative methods to extract language structures from large arrays of texts. An overview of the existing empirical research base is given.

Results and discussion. As a result of the review study, the evolution of approaches to scientific discourse is characterized, their chronological framework is determined, key concepts that influenced the modern understanding of scientific communication are identified (genre-stylistic, sociocultural, cognitive, linguocultural, pragmalinguistic, communicative-pragmatic approaches), modern interpretations of scientific discourse are analyzed and prospects for further research are outlined. It is shown that in the study of scientific discourse, the corpus methodology is today in demand and is used in its synchronic and diachronic description. The diachronic development of the English-language scientific discourse by the example of a scientific article genre is an extremely interesting issue, which, according to our data, has not been thoroughly studied before. That is why our further works will be devoted to its consideration.

Conclusion. It is shown that despite the long and intensive study of scientific discourse in the scientific literature there is an insufficient number of works highlighting the trends in the development of scientific communication genres, which demonstrate a certain historical dynamics and changes in the collective consciousness. It is concluded that the discursivecorpus approach to the study of scientific discourse and the methods of corpus linguistics make it possible to objectively identify and describe dynamic processes in the field of written scientific communication caused by changing ways of knowledge transfer under the influence of changes in the socio-cultural context and intensive development of science.

1. Stebletsova, A.O. (2020), “Academic Discourse in Western Research at the Turn of the 21st Century: Evolution of Approaches and Concepts”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.1.

2. Karasik, V.I. (1998), “About the categories of discourse”, Yazykovaya lichnost': sotsiolingvisticheskie i emotivnye aspekty [Yazykovaya lichnost': sotsiolingvisticheskie i emotivnye aspekty], Peremena, Volgograd, RUS, pp. 185–197.

3. Karasik, V.I. (2002), Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse], Volgograd, Peremena, RUS.

4. Mikhailova, E.V. (1999), “Intertekstual'nost' v nauchnom diskurse (na materiale statey) [ntertextuality in scientific discourse (based on articles)”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Volgograd State Pedagogical Univ., Volgograd, RUS.

5. Dudnikova, L.V. (2018), “Sub-discursive variability of means of realization of cohesion in scientific discourse: on the material of English and French”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, Southern Federal Univ., Rostov-na-Donu, RUS.

6. Khutyz, I.P. (2015), “Features of the academic discourse designing: orientation to the reader / author”, Vestnik of Maikop State Technological Univ., no. 1, pp. 77–82.

7. Khutyz, I.P. (2016), “Linguo-cultural Traditions in Academic Discourse: Construction Specifics”, MCU J. of Philology. Theory of linguistics. Linguistic education, no. 3 (23), pp. 86–93.

8. Khutyz, I.P. (2018), Akademicheskii diskurs: kul'turno-spetsificheskaya sistema konstruirovaniya i translyatsii znanii [Academic discourse: a culturally specific system of constructing and translating knowledge], Flinta, Moscow, RUS.

9. Riabtseva, N.K. (2017), “Foreign language for academic purposes: integral representation of linguistic information”, Magiya INNO: Novye izmereniya v lingvistike i lingvodidaktike [The magic of INNO: New dimensions in linguistics and linguodidactics], vol. 2, pp. 243–250, MGIMO Univ., Moscow, RUS.

10. Riabtseva, N.K. (2018), “Academic papers titles: a Russian - English perspective”, Nauchnyy dialog, no. 6, pp. 32–42. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2018-6-32-42.

11. Riabtseva, N.K. (2021), “Terms as cognitive dominants in scientific communication and their cross-linguistic equivalents”, Cognitive studies of language, no. 1 (44), pp. 356–364.

12. Riabtseva, N.K. (1992), “Mental performatives in scientific discourse”, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 4, pp. 12–28.

13. Stebletsova, A.O. and Naumenko, Yu.N. (2019), “Titles of English and Russian research articles: discursive and cognitive features”, Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic Univ, Humanitarian Sciences, iss. 4 (820), pp. 161–179.

14. Kuz'menko, P.B. (2020), “Structural and content organization of a humanitarian scientific text in English (based on publications on linguistics)”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Voronezh State Univ., Voronezh, RUS.

15. Kochetova, L.A. and Ilyinova, E.Yu. (2020), “English academic discourse in translinguistic context: corpus-based study of lexical markers”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 25–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.5.3.

16. Kogut, S.V. (2016), “Discursive markers in a scientific text: ethno-cultural and discursive aspects (in Russian and German language material)”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Tomsk Polytechnic Univ., Tomsk, RUS.

17. Naumenko, Yu.N. (2021), “Markers of scientific research categories: comparative analysis of verbalization methods”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, Tver State Univ., Tver, RUS.

18. Kochetova, L.A. and Kononova, I.V. (2022), “Сorpus-Based Contrastive Study of Discursive Strategy of Construing Interpersonal Relations in English Language Academic Discourse”, J. of Siberian Federal Univ. Humanitites and Social Sciences, 15 (10), pp. 1516–1523. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0353.

19. Khomutova, T.N. (2015), “Strategies of Research Discourse: an Integral Approach”, Bulletin of the South Ural State Univ. Ser. Linguistics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 15–22.

20. Khomutova, T.N. (2019), “Verbalization of cultural values in English-language scientific discourse”, Cultural values in linguistic consciousness and communicative practice, International Conference Proceedings, Tianjin, November 16, 2018, Tianjin Foreign Studies Univ., Tianjin, CHN, pp. 271–279.

21. Khomutova, T.N. and Silkina, O.M. (2018), “The macrostructure of a scientific abstract”, Bulletin of the South Ural State Univ. Ser. Linguistics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 21–30. DOI: 10.14529/ling180404.

22. Nokhrin, A.V. (2019), “Verbalization of moral values in scientific ecological discourse”, Can. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, South Ural State Univ., Chelyabinsk, RUS.

23. Drozdova, T.V. (2003), “Scientific text and problems of its understanding: based on the material of English-language economic texts”, Abstract of Dr. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, Institute of Linguistics RAS, Moscow, RUS.

24. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2017), Nauchnyi diskurs: Vydvizhenie rezul'tata kak kommunikativnaya i yazykovaya problema [Scientific discourse: The promotion of results as a communicative and linguistic problem], LENAND, Moscow, RUS.

25. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2007), Interpretatsiya nauchnogo teksta [Interpretation of a scientific text], Izd-vo LKI, Moscow, RUS.

26. Malyuga, E.N. (2019), “New trends in English-language scientific discourse: issues of relevance of research and linguistic identity”, Tomsk State Univ. J. of Philology, no. 58, pp. 52–70. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/58/4.

27. Kochetova, L.A. (2013), Angliiskii reklamnyi diskurs v dinamicheskom aspekte [English advertising discourse in a dynamic aspect], Izd-vo VolGU, Volgograd, RUS.

28. Sukhomlinova, M.A. (2018), Sovremennyi angloyazychnyi akademicheskii diskurs: genezis i zhanrovaya spetsifika [Modern English-language academic discourse: genesis and genre specifics], Izd-vo Yuzhnogo feder. un-ta, Rostov-na-Donu, Taganrog, RUS.