The Problem of the Actual Infinity and the Path of the New European Classical Epistemology: from Genesis to the Modern Crisis

Introduction. The purpose of the paper is to show the prospects of the problem of actual infinity for understanding the ways of New European classical epistemology. The relevance of the work is due to the need to fill a gap in the history of New European epistemology, which today makes it difficult to understand the essence of its crisis. Such a lacuna was formed by the lack of grounds for the transition from the probabilistic concept of natural science, which takes into account apophaticism associated with the idea of actual infinity, to positive science, which presupposes a positive understanding of actual infinity.

Methodology and sources. The author of the paper reconstructs and critically analyzes the attempts of the founders of New European science (Galileo and Descartes) to reform the ontological project of Nikolai Kuzansky due to the need for a positive understanding of the actual infinity. The author distinguishes between the reception of the problem of actual infinity in the New European philosophy and its objective state. Based on a comparative analysis, the author of the article establishes the identity of the logic of the development of the problem of actual infinity in the studies of Zeno of Elea and in New European epistemology, thereby testifying to its enduring significance.

Results and discussion. The author shows that in the development of the problem of actual infinity, an objective regularity manifests itself, consisting in the fact that an unjustified assumption of the possibility of changing physical nature on the basis of the actual infinite really leads to a change in nature, but only the basis for this change is not actual, but potential infinity. This logic was reproduced in the history of New European epistemology. Thereby, mathematical natural science really turned out to be possible, but not on what its creators put in the basis (actual infinity), but on a derivative of it (potential infinity), and as a result it strengthens the position of supporters of non-classics.

Conclusion. The problem of actual infinity makes it possible to understand the logic of the development of New European epistemology from its genesis to the modern crisis, and shows a deep interconnection between these two points.

1. Pruzhinin, B.I. (2009), “Non-classical epistemology: a look from the Classics”, Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul'tura [Postnonclassics: philosophy, science, culture], Mir, SPb., RUS, рр. 230–248.

2. Mamardashvili, M.K. (2010), Klassicheskii i neklassicheskii idealy ratsional'nosti [Classical and nonclassical ideals of rationality], Azbuka, SPb., RUS.

3. Rodin, A.V. (2003), “The idea of inter-nal geometry”, Matematika i opyt [Mathematics and experience], in Barabashev, A.G. (ed.), Izd-vo MGU, Mosсow, RUS, рр. 502–545.

4. Gaidenko, P.P. (1998), “On the question of the genesis of New European science”, Philosophy of science, iss. 4, pp. 52–60.

5. Aristotel' (2007), Physics, Transl. by Karpov, V.P., KomKniga, Mosсow, RUS.

6. Akhutin, A.V. (1988), Ponyatie “priroda” v antichnosti i v Novoe vremya (“fyusis” i “natura”) [The concept of “nature” in antiquity and in mod-ern times (“fusis” and “nature”)], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

7. Cusanus, N. (2011), De Docta Ignorantia, Transl. by Bibikhin, V.V., Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, RUS.

8. Bacon, F. (1971), Instauratio Magna Scientiarum, Works in 2 vol., vol. 1, Mysl', Moscow, USSR, p. 57–84.

9. Descartes, R. (1934), Le monde ou traite de la Lumiere. La description du corps humain. De la Formation de l'animal, Transl. by Vasil'ev, S.F., GTTI, Moscow, USSR.

10. Descartes, R. (1994), Meditationes de prima philosophia, in 2 vol., vol. 2, Transl., Mysl', Moscow, RUS.

11. Koyre, A. (1985), Etudes d'Histoire de la Pensee philosophique, Transl. by. Lyatker, Ya.A., Progress, Mosсow, USSR.

12. Malyshkin, E.V. (2011), Dve metafory pamyati [Two metaphors of memory], Izd. dom SPbGU, SPb, RUS.

13. Ricoeur, P. (1997), “The Crisis of the "Cogito"”, Bessmertie filosofskih idej Dekarta [Immortality of Descartes' philosophical ideas], RAS Institute of Philosophy, Moscow, RUS, рр. 14–31.

14. Bruno, G. (1949), Dialogi [Dialogues], Transl., Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR.

15. Galilei, G. (1964), “Dialogo”, Transl. by Dolgov, A.I., Opere Scelte, in 2 vol., vol. 1, Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

16. Sanctus Aurelius Augustinus (1994), De Civitate Dei, vol. II, Izd-vo Spaso-Preobrazhenskogo Valaamskogo Stavropigial'nogo monastyria, Mosсow, RUS.

17. Bibler, V.S. (1979), “Galileo and the Logic of Modern Thinking”, Mekhanika i tsivilizatsiya XVII– XIX vv. [Mechanics and civilization of the XVII–XIX centuries], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, 448–518.

18. Butts, R.E. (1978), “Some tactics in Galileo’s propaganda for the mathematization of scientific experience”, New perspectives on Galileo, vol. 14, Springer, Dordrecht, NDL, pp. 59–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9799-8_2.

19. Butts, R.E. (1989), “Some tactics in Galileo’s propaganda for the mathematization of scientific experience”, Metodologicheskie printsipy sovremennykh issledovanii razvitiya nauki (Galilei) [Methodological principles of modern research on the development of science (Galileo)], in Kosarev, L.M. (ed.), INION, Moscow, USSR, pp. 114–128.

20. Aristotel' (2022), Metaphysics, Trans. by Kubitsky, A., AST Publishing House, Mosсow, RUS.

21. Kessidi, F.Kh. (2003), Ot mifa k logosu: stanovlenie grecheskoi filosofii [From Myth to Logos: The Making of Greek Philosophy], Aleteiya, SPb., RUS.

22. Kosareva, L.M. (1997), Rozhdenie nauki novogo vremeni iz dukha kul'tury [The birth of modern science from the spirit of culture], In-t psikhologii RAN, Mosсow, RUS.

23. Agazzi, E. (2017), Scientific objectivity and its contexts, Transl. by Lakhuti, D.G., ProgressTraditsiya, Mosсow, RUS.

24. Katasonov, V.N. (2004), “The concept of actual infinity as a “scientific icon” of the Deity”, Khristianstvo i nauka: ΧΙΙ mezhdunar. Rozhdestvenskie obrazovatel'nye chteniya [Christianity and Science: ΧΙΙ Intern. Christmas Educational Readings], Mosсow, RUS, available at: http://katasonov-vn.narod.ru/statji/razdel2/2-10_v.n.katasonov_koncepcija_aktualnoj_beskonechn.htm (accessed 14.09.2022).

25. Meiïlassoux, K. (2015), Après la finitude. Essai sur la nécessité de la contingence, Transl. by Medvedeva, L., Kabinetnyi uchenyi, Ekaterinburg, Moscow, RUS.

26. Badiou, A. (1988), L’etre et I’evenement, Ed. du Seuil, Paris, FRA.

27. Vygodskii, M.Ya. (1931), Osnovaniya ischisleniya beskonechno-malykh [Foundations of the calculus of infinitesimals], Ogiz – Gos. nauch.-tekhn. izd-vo, Moscow, Leningrad, USSR.

28. Yushkevich, A.P. (1970), Istoriya matematiki. Vol. 2. Matematika XVII stoletiya [History of mathematics. Vol. 2. Mathematics of the 17th century], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

29. Euler, L. (1949), Vollständige Anleitung zur Differential-Rechnung, Transl. by Vygodskii, M.Ya., GITTL, Moscow, Leningrad, USSR.

30. Bourbaki, N. (1965), Theorie Des Ensembles. Livre I, Transl. by Povarov, G.I., Shikhanovich, Yu.A., Mir, Moscow, USSR.

31. Frege, G. (1903), Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, bd. II, Verlag von Hermann Pohle, Jena, GER.