The Ethics of the Virtual Educational Environment, New Meanings

Introduction. The purpose of this study is to analyze the ethical and linguo-didactic aspects of the virtual educational space of higher education. The COVID-19 pandemic has served as a catalyst for the transition of education to an online format. Of course, most educational institutions and teachers were forced to quickly adapt the methods and forms of online organization of the educational process. The issue of online education has long been considered from the scientific and practical sides, but such a quick and forced transition to online revealed a number of problems and features of online communication. One of the most significant is the problem of the ethics of online communication in education.

Methodology and sources. The theoretical base of the study is represented by the works of Russian and foreign authors in the field of pedagogy of the Higher School (I.V. Robert, I.P. Kuzheleva-Sagan), the theory of generations (N. Howe and W. Strauss, D. and I. Stillman, Shamis) and intercultural communications (G. Hoftede).

The empirical base of the study was data obtained during interviews with teachers (23) and students (27) of a higher school (semi-structured, random sample), analysis of the content of educational chats and visual analysis of student avatars (625) used in Zoom.

Results and discussion. The article outlines the directions of research into the problems of ethics in the process of online education. On the basis of empirical data, the authors record the transfer of an informal style of communication into the format of educational communication with a teacher, which is spontaneously emotional in nature. The authors make the assumption that the regulation of communication processes had an optional and often non-mandatory format. Particular attention is paid to the understanding and perception of the ethical norms of communication by representatives of different generations.

Conclusion. The synchronous format of educational communication in the online format has other syntactic, semantic and stylistic features that differ from the previously generally accepted academic language. In the future, this issue requires a comprehensive consideration not only from the communication and ethical side, but also from the point of view of legal and information security. It is necessary to form ethical standards for online teaching.

1. Nazarova, Yu.V. and Anishchenko, O.S. (2019), “New digital ethics in the virtual space: dilemmas of control and ethical expertise”, Gumanitarnyye Vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, vol. 1, iss. 4 (32), pp. 23–31. DOI: 10.22405/2304-4772-2019-1-4-23-31.

2. Schwab, K. (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Transl., in Merkur'eva, A. (ed.), Eksmo, Moscow, RUS.

3. Tkacheva, K.A. and Shepeleva, O.S. (2020), “Ethics and Digital: Ethical Problems of Digital Technologies”, Tsentr podgotovki rukovoditelei i komand tsifrovoi transformatsii [Training Center for Leaders and Digital Transformation Teams.], available at: https://ethics.cdto.center/1_1 (accessed 25.12.2020).

4. Howe, N. and Strauss, W. (1991), Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069, William Morrow & Company, NY, USA.

5. Tulgan, B. (2017), Not everyone gets a trophy. How to Manage Generation Y, Transl., Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, RUS.

6. Stillman, D. and Stillman, I. (2018), Gen Z @ Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace, Transl. by Kondukov, Yu., Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, Moscow, RUS.

7. Shamis, E. and Nikonov, E. (2017), Teoriya pokolenii. Strategiya Bebi-Bumerov [The theory of generations. Baby Boomer Strategy], Sinergiya, Moscow, RUS.

8. Shamis, E. and Nikonov, E. (2020), Teoriya pokolenii. Neobyknovennyi Iks [The theory of generations. Extraordinary X], Sinergiya, Moscow, RUS.

9. Nosova, S.S. and Kuzheleva-Sagan, I.P. (2013), “Youth in network information and communicative society: foreign approaches to study issues”, Siberian J. of Psychology, no. 49, pp. 85–96.

10. Robert, I.V. (2020), “Directions for the development of informatization of domestic education in the period of digital information technologies”, Elektronnye biblioteki [Digital Libraries], vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 145–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26907/1562-5419-2020-23-1-2-145-164.

11. Radaev, V.V. (2021), “How to teach new generations of students?”, Youtube.com, available at: https://youtu.be/C3WGvCjIZyc (accessed 20.01.2021).

12. Emelin, V.A. (2016), “Simulacra and virtualization technologies in information society”, National Psychological J., no. 3, pp. 86–97. DOI: 10.11621/npj.2016.0313.

13. Hofstede Insights, available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/ (accessed 15.01.2021).

14. Arbuzova, A. (2021), “Generational difference: what are they - Generation Z and the alphas that follow?”, RBC. Trends, available at: https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/futurology/5dfcabbf9a7947a532b7f9a5 (accessed 20.02.2021).

15. “Understanding Generation Alpha”, Mccrindle, available at: https://mccrindle.com.au/insights/blog/gen-alpha-defined/ (accessed 20.02.2021).

16. WAY2WEI – digital platform for assessing and developing emotional intelligence, available at: https://way2wei.ru (accessed 15.02.2021).

17. Vasil'eva, K.A. (2018), “Emotional intelligence in the digital economy”, Formirovanie ob-shchekul'turnykh i professional'nykh kompetentsii finansista: sb. nauch. tr. [Formation of general cultural and professional competencies of a financier: sat. scientific tr.], vol. 2, iss. 8, OOO «SVIVT», Moscow, RUS, pp. 36–41.

18. Robert, I.V. (2017), “Development of education informatization based on digital technologies: intellectualization of the training process and possible negative consequences”, Russian J. of Social Sciences and Humanities, no. 4 (30), pp. 65–71. DOI: 10.17238/issn1998-5320.2017.30.65.

19. “Distance Learning Tools”, UNESCO, available at: https://ru.unesco.org/node/320923?fbclid=IwAR17We_fB0bcvqjWDribQFjpIrTxQa8puikfQTN2dimKMeGObrUBh5goV7g (accessed 12.02.2021).