Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

Vocabulary of the German COVID-19 Pandemic Discourse

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-158-171

Abstract

Introduction. The paper presents a synchronous snapshot in the development of the vocabulary of the German language during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study examines the sources and composition of neologisms, reveals specific features of current derivational processes and analyses the functional features of linguistic metaphor in the process of reflection on a new reality.

Methodology and sources. The research is based on the theory of neology, cognitive word- formation and the theory of conceptual metaphor. The sources for the linguistic material collection are the online dictionary of pandemic neologisms, created at the Leibniz Institute for the German Language in Mannheim (Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache, IDS), news and journalistic texts in the German mass media placed in the Internet.

Results and discussion. The semantic content of neologisms and loanwords, and their functioning have been identified. The analysis of the word-formation categorization of the pandemic reality showed the productivity of traditional word-formation models and frequent use of the terminological elements “Corona”, “Covid” in the process of formation of vocabulary in common use. The authors argue that newly appeared words are features of the German language.

Conclusion. The article concludes that appearance of new and metaphorically rethought vocabulary is a way to adapt to the new reality and express an emotional attitude to it, as well as a way to overcome the fear of getting infected.

About the Authors

N. А. Trofimova
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Nella A. Trofimova – Dr. Sci. (Philology) (2009), Doсent (1998), Associate Professor at the Department of German language7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034


O. A. Orlova
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Olga A. Orlova − Can. Sci. (Philology) (2002), Docent (2012), Associate Professor at the Department of German language 7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034


E. A. Pridorogina
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Elena A. Pridorogina − Can. Sci. (Philology) (2016), Associate Professor at the Department of German language,7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034


S. Yu. Novikova
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Svetlana Yu. Novikova − Can. Sci. (Philology) (2018), Senior Lecturer at the Department of German language7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034


References

1. Temirgazina, Z.K. and Luczyk, M. (2020), “Semiotics of “pandemic” discourse: “newspeak” of quarantine era”, Philological sciences. Scientific essays of higher education, no. 6–1, pp. 30–38. DOI: 10.20339/PhS.6-20.030.

2. Vujčič, N. (2020), “Der Corona-Diskurs in Serbien: Zwischen Verharmlosung und Einschüchterung“, Aptum, Bd. 16, pp. 182–187. DOI: 10.46771/978-3-96769-102-3.

3. Vogel, F. (2020), ““Wenn Virologen alle paar Tage ihre Meinung ändern, müssen wir in der Politik dagegenhalten”. Thesen zur politischen Sprache und (strategischen) Kommunikation im Pandemie- Krisendiskurs", Sprachreport, no. 3, S. 20–29. DOI: 10.14618/sr-3-2020-vog.

4. Shiyan, T.A. (2020), “Discourse as a Communication System”, Poryadki diskursa v filosofii i kul'ture. Ale-shinskie chteniya–2020: mat. vseross. nauch. konf. s mezhdunar. uch. [Orders of Discourse in Philosophy and Culture: Aleschin Readings – 2020. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation], IP Kolmagorov, Barnaul, RUS, pp. 16–21.

5. Duden: Unsere Wörter des Jahrzehnts: 2000–2010; Chai Latte, Ego-Googeln und Ich-AG (2011), Hrsg. von H. Pfersdorff, Dudenverl, Mannheim; Zürich, DEU.

6. “Neologismenwörterbuch: Neuer Wortschatz rund um die Coronapandemie“, OWID, available at: https://www.owid.de/docs/neo/listen/corona.jsp (accessed 25.06.2021).

7. “Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache“, DWDS, available at: https://www.dwds.de/ (accessed 25.06.2021).

8. Sprachglossen und wissenschaftliche Beiträge. Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache (2021), available at: https://www.ids-mannheim.de/sprache-in-der-coronacrise (accessed 05.05.2021).

9. Klosa-Kückelhaus, A. (2020), “Neue Wörter in der Coronakrise – Von Social Distancing und Gabenzaun”, Sprachreport, no. 2, S. 1–5. DOI: 10.14618/sr-2-2020-kl.

10. Müller-Spitzer, C., Wolfler, S., Koplenig, A. and Michaelis, F. (2020), “cOWIDplus Viewer: Sprachliche Spuren der Corona-Krise in Deutschen Online-Nachrichtenmeldungen. Explorieren Sie selbst!”, Sprachreport, no. 3, S. 14–19. DOI: 10.14618/sr-3-2020-mue.

11. Möhrs, Ch. (2020), “Grübelst du noch oder weißt du es schon? – Glossare erklären Corona-Schlüsselbegriffe”, Sprachreport, no. 3, S. 30–37. DOI: 10.14618/sr-3-2020-moe.

12. Mayer, V.S. (2020), “The coronavirus pandemic as a linguistic marker of modernity (on the material of the German language)”, The Humanities and social sciences, no. 4, pp. 124–137. DOI: 10.18522/2070-1403-2020-81-4-124-137.

13. Kharitonova, E.Yu. (2021), “Enrichment of the language vocabulary in the COVID-19 epoch (based on German language)”, Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi lingvistiki: mat. VIII Regional'noi nauch.- praktich. konf. k 90-letiyu MGOU [Actual issues of modern linguistics: Mat. VIII Regional scientific and practical. conf. to the 90th anniversary of MGOU], Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj oblastnoj universitet, Moscow, RUS, pp. 110–113.

14. Nichiporchik, T.A. and Furashova, N.V. (2021), “Nomination of phenomena in the thematic sphere “Covid-19” in German”, Minsk State Linguistic Univ. Bulletin. Ser. 1. Philology, no. 5 (114), pp. 107−112.

15. Redkozubova, E.A. (2020), “COVID-vocabulary: etymology and word-formation (based on Russian, English, German)”, The Humanities and social sciences, no. 4, pp. 193–200. DOI: 10.18522/2070- 1403-2020-81-4-193-200.

16. Pavlova, A.S. (2021), “”Covid” lexicon of German language as a fragment of the national world picture”, Russkii yazyk koronavirusnoi epokhi [Russian language of the Coronavirus Epoch], In-t lingvisticheskih issledovanij RAN, SPb., RUS, pp. 533−549.

17. Bazhaykin, N.E. (2006), “Persuasive impact in pandemic discourse: on the material of speech by A. Merkel”, Kazan Science, no. 6, pp. 54–56.

18. Petrenko, D.A., Likhachev, E.V., and Chernyshova, M.V. (2020), “Linguistic Means in Image of COVID-19 (German Political Discourse in Media)”, Nauchnyi dialog, no. 7, pp. 194−209. DOI: 10.24224/ 2227-1295-2020-7-194-209.

19. Shamanskaya, M.A. (2021), “Metaphorical representation of the covid-19 pandemicin german mass media texts”, Proceedings of VSU. Ser. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 2, pp. 103–109.

20. Litvinova, T.I. and Shustova, I.N. (2021), “The Peculiarities of Functioning of Coloristic Methaphors of the German Media-Political Discourse of the Pandemic Period”, Russian Linguistic Bulletin, no. 2 (26), pp. 22−27. DOI: 10.18454/RULB.2021.26.2.12.

21. Shemchuk, Yu.M. (2020), “Lexical changes in the German language under the influence of the coronavirus pandemic (on the example of neologisms of sports topics)”, The world of science, culture and education, no. 4, pp. 498–500. DOI: 10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00844.

22. Moskvitin, E.V. (2021), “German Neologisms during the SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Pandemic”, Philology. Theory & Practice, vol. 14, iss. 9, pp. 2792–2796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210464.

23. Nefedova, L.A. (2021), “On discourse markedness of the coronavirus pandemic vocabulary (in the German language)”, Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic Univ. Humanities, no. 3, pp. 185−196. DOI: 10.52070/2542-2197_2021_3_845_185.

24. Dmitrieva, O.A. and Vanyushina, N.A. (2021), “Neologisms of the COVID-19 pandemic era (based on the material of the Russian and German languages)”, World of linguistics and communication: electronic scientific J., no. 2, pp. 48–62, available at: www.tverlingua.ru (accessed 13.01.2022).

25. Zifonun, G. (2021), “Anglizismen in der Coronakrise”, Sprachreport, no. 1, S. 6–9. DOI: 10.14618/sr-1-2021-zif.

26. Eisenberg, P. (2014), “Anglizismen im Deutschen“, Reichtum und Armut der deutschen Sprache. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, DEU. S. 57–120. DOI: 10.1515/9783110334739.57.

27. Astafurova, T.N. and Suhorukova, O.N. (2006), “Telescoping: a new method of word- formation?”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 182–185.

28. Dankova, N.S. and Krekhtunova, E.V. (2020), “Media Representation of the Pandemic: a Metaphorical Image of War (based on American Newspapers)”, Nauchnyj dialog, no. 8, pp. 69–83. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-8-69-83

29. Velikaya, N.M., Sacca, F. and Irsetskaya, E.A. (2021), “Coronavirus pandemic in the modern Russian public discourse: threats, challenges and opportunities”, Management Issues, no. 1, pp. 8–22. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2021-1-8-22.

30. Denisova, G.L. (2021), “Valuation Сomponent of Metaphor UP vs. DOWN in German Political Cartoon”, RUDN J. of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 559–575. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-3-559-575.

31. Kara-Murza, S.G. (2005), Manipulyatsiya soznaniem [Conscious manipulation], Eksmo, Moscow, RUS.

32. Kupina, N.A. (2020), "Coronavirus pandemic: metaphoric diagnostics of anxious reality in the media texts", Izvestia Ural Federal University Journal. Ser. 1. Issues in education, science and culture, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 5–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/izv1.2020.26.3.044.


Review

For citations:


Trofimova N.А., Orlova O.A., Pridorogina E.A., Novikova S.Yu. Vocabulary of the German COVID-19 Pandemic Discourse. Discourse. 2022;8(4):158-171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-158-171

Views: 933


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)