Linguocognitology & Systemology: Integrativity in actu (Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Interaction)

Introduction. The study analyzes the systemological adequacy of the cognitive approach to language and on this basis suggests a method of cognitive-systemological interpretation of linguistic facts. The cognitive approach is in a good agreement with the functional nature of the object of linguistics. At the same time the theoretical and methodological guidelines of cognitive linguistics allow us to reveal more deeply and holistically the ontological properties of language as a system phenomenon.

Methodology and sources. The research tasks involve assessing the role and novelty of cognitive linguistics in description language as a system, in substantiating the significance of interpreting thought-language interaction in the context of certain parameters of the system nature of language and, as a consequence, in developing a possible method of such interpretation. The paper used the axiomatic-deductive method, as well as the descriptive method with its techniques of observation, generalization, systematization and interpretation. In addition, at the stage of presenting the method, we resorted to the modeling its procedure. The research material consists of the methodological principles of cognitive linguistics, philosophical dialectics and general theory of systems presented in domestic and foreign sources.

Results and discussion. The analysis of the methodology and subject area of linguocognitology suggests that cognitive models of language have the great explanatory power and completeness in terms of representing this phenomenon as a naturally developing complex and large open-type system. In this sense, linguocognitology appears as a logical continuation of the development of a system approach in linguistics at a new level. The work proposes a structural and logical organization of the method of cognitive- systemological interpretation in the form of a number of procedures.

Conclusion. As a result of the conducted searches, the author comes to the conclusion about the practicability of cognitive-systemological interpretation of multilevel phenomena of semantic space, which is due, on the one hand, to the close links of natural language with the cognitive environment and, on the other hand, its system-wide nature. The systemological aspect of the consideration on the cognitive essence of language corresponds both to the ontology of the object itself and to the value orientations of the philosophy of science and the modern paradigm of linguistics. The research aspect, emphasizing the cognitive causality of system parameters or the systemological status of linguistic facts, underlies the identification of two versions of this method.

1. Kachanova, T.L. and Fomin, B.F. (1999), Osnovaniya sistemologii fenomenal'nogo [Foundations of the systemology of the phenomenal], Izd-vo SPbGETU “LETI”, SPb., RUS.

2. Borzenko, I.M. (2001), Nauka glazami sistemologa [Science through the eyes of a systemologist], available at: http://www.humanism.ru/biblioteka/68-poruganie/277-sistemolog.html (accessed 10.12.2021).

3. Blauberg, I.V. (1988), “Dialectics of exact and inaccurate in modern scientific knowledge”, Russian Studies in Philosophy, no. 12, pp. 12–18.

4. Urmantsev, Yu.A. (2001), Devyat' plyus odin etyud o sistemnoi filosofii [Nine plus one etude on system philosophy. Synthesis of worldviews], Institut Kholodinamiki, Moscow, RUS.

5. fon Bertalanfi, L. (1969), “General theory of systems: critical review”, Issledovaniya po obshchei teorii system [Research on the general theory of systems], in Sadovskiy, V.N. and Yudina, E.G. (eds.), Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 23–82.

6. Bogdanov, A.A. (1989), Tektologiya: (Vseobshchaya organizatsionnaya nauka) [Tectology: A universal Organizational Science], in 2 books, book 1, Ekonomika, Moscow, USSR.

7. Shipunova, O.D. (2016), Istoriya i metodologiya nauki [History and methodology of science], Izd-vo Politekhnicheskogo universiteta, SPb., RUS.

8. Kotyurova, M.P. (2010), Stilistika nauchnoi rechi [The style of scientific speech], Akademiya, Moscow, RUS.

9. Komarova, Z.I. (2016), Tekhnologiya nauchnykh issledovanii v sistemnoi metodologii sovremennoi lingvistiki [Technology of scientific research in the system methodology of modern linguistics], Ural'skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet, Ekaterinburg, RUS.

10. Alekseev, P.V. and Panin, A.V. (2005), Filosofiya [Philosophy], 3rd ed., revised. and additional, TK Velbi: Izd-vo Prospekt, Moscow, RUS.

11. Shchedrovitskii, G.P. (1997), Filosofiya. Nauka. Metodologiya [Philosophy. Science. Methodology], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

12. Zubkova, L.G. (2002), Obshchaya teoriya yazyka v razvitii [General theory of language in development], Izd-vo RUDN, Moscow, RUS.

13. Mironova, D.M. (2015), “The fundamental principles of open systems in the mirror of cognitive linguistics”, Scholarly Notes of Komsomolsk-na-Amure State Technical Univ., no. I–2 (21), pp. 35–41.

14. Mironova, D.M. (2020), “On the systemological adequacy of a cognitive approach to language”, Tomsk State Univ. J. of Philology, no. 63, pp. 64–82. DOI: 10.17223/19986645/63/4.

15. Sannikov, V.Z. (2002), Russkii yazyk v zerkale yazykovoi igry [The Russian language in the mirror of the language game], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Moscow, RUS.

16. Alefirenko, N.F. (2008), “Cognitive linguistics: prerequisites, subject, categories”, Herald of Vyatka State Humanitarian Univ., no. 2 (1), pp. 75–78.

17. Popova, Z.D. and Sternin, I.A. (2007), Obshchee yazykoznanie [General Linguistics], ACT: Vostok- Zapad, Moscow, RUS.

18. Karaulov, Yu.N. (2010), Russkii yazyk i yazykovaya lichnost' [Russian language and language personality], Izd-vo LKI, Moscow, RUS.

19. Sergeeva, E.N. (2009), “The idea of a concept and aspects of its study in modern linguistics”, Vestnik VEGU [Bulletin of Eastern Economic and Legal Humanitarian Academy], no. 3 (41), pp. 72–85.

20. Grinev-Grinevich, S.V. and Sorokina, E.A. (2010), “The methods of linguistic research revisit”, Bulletin of the Moscow State Region Univ. Ser. Linguistics, no. 1, pp. 23–31.

21. Ponomarev, A.B. and Pikuleva, Е.А. (2014), Metodologiya nauchnykh issledovanii [Methodology of scientific research], Izd-vo Perm. nats. issled. politekhn. un-ta, Perm', RUS.

22. Kondakov, N.I. (2012), Logicheskii slovar'-spravochnik [Logical dictionary-reference], Kniga po Trebovaniyu, Moscow, RUS.

23. Popova, Z.D. and Sternin, I.A. (2010), Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistics], AST: Vostok-Zapad, Moscow, RUS.

24. Boldyrev, N.N. (2001), Kognitivnaya semantika: kurs lektsii po angl. filologii [Cognitive semantics: a course of lectures on English philology], Izd-vo TGU, Tambov, RUS.

25. Trubetskoi, N.S. (1987), Izbrannye trudy po filologii [Selected works on philology], Progress, Moscow, USSR.

26. Boldyrev, N.N. (2010), “Interaction of cognitive and linguistic structures: results and prospects of the study”, Vzaimodeistvie myslitel'nykh i yazykovykh struktur [Interaction of cognitive and linguistic structures], Izdatel'skii dom TGU imeni G. R. Derzhavina, Tambov, RUS, pp. 17–22.

27. Stepanov, Yu.S. (1975), Metody i printsipy sovremennoi lingvistiki [Methods and principles of modern linguistics], Nauka, Moscow, RUS, available at: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=53123 (accessed 15.12.2021).