Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

Symbiotes of the Digital Environment: to the Epidemiological Theory of the Interface

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-29-41

Abstract

Introduction. In modern life sciences, it is impossible to ignore the problems of viruses, bacteria, parasites and their impact on the ecosystems. But the interface is a human ecosystem of the digital age and a new formation of life, which means that it also needs to be understood from subdiscursive elements, such as digital analogues of viruses, bacteria, and parasites.

Methodology and sources. Methodologically, the work is based on a philosophical analysis of the challenges and precedents of the digital field, examples of research literature, the methods of media philosophy, anarchist epistemology, and philosophical epidemiology are applied (M. Foucault, K. Kukso).

Results and discussion. The article shows that the epistemological understanding of the interface should be supplemented with an epidemiological understanding, otherwise the principles and forms of life translated into numbers will elude theory.

The interface is thought of as a condition of possibilities: discursive, instrumental, demonstrative. The interface is seen as an epistemological configuration (from the Greek ῐ̔ѧστημῐ, i.e. not just “possessing knowledge”, but “possessing”, – to establish, appoint) – as a form of power, i.e. as a series of forced measures, reacting to something not completely determined, spontaneous, but imperceptibly limiting and transforming the will, the very logic of the act, or the pragmatics of the action.

Conclusion. To understand the interface, it is necessary to shift attention from various plugins, drivers, interactive mechanics that determine epistemological possibilities to microprocesses that build the interface as a user experience based on epidemiological restrictions.

About the Author

K. А. Ocheretyany
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Konstantin A. Ocheretyany – Can. Sci. (Philosophy) (2015), Senior Lecturer at the Department of Philosophy of Science and Technology

5 Mendeleevskaya line, St Petersburg 199034



References

1. Gurney, A. (2004), Compass: A Story of Exploration and Innovation, Norton, NY; London, USA.

2. Ronell, A. (1989), The Telephone Book: Technology, Schizophrenia, Electric Speech, Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, USA.

3. Heidegger, M. (1997), Sein und Zeit, Transl. by Bibikhin, V.V., Ad Marginem, Moscow, RUS.

4. Kukso, K.A. (2021), “The Languages of Epidemic”, J. of the Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 64–73. DOI: 10.25991/VRHGA.2021.22.2.011.

5. Caffo, L. (2014), “Foreword”, The Monist, vol. 97, iss. 2, pp. 159–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201497210.

6. Latypova, A.R. (2020), “Between Mutation and Glitch: Digital Evolution of Media”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 162–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps202057228.

7. Milgram, S. (1963), “Behavioral Study of Obedience”, The J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, iss. 67 (4), pp. 371–378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525.

8. Sivkov, D.Yu. (2014), “Paradoxes of autoimmunity. Preface to Ed Cohen’s translation”, Sociology of Power, no. 4, pp. 174–181.

9. Lenkevich A.S. (2021), ““Are you in your body?!”. The study of Biopolitical Interface Design”, Galactica Media: J. of Media Studies, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 141–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i2.160.

10. Derrida, J. (2004), “Autoimmunity: real and symbolic suicide: a dialogue with Jaсques Derrida”, Philosophy in a time of terror: dialogues with Jurgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, London, USA, pp. 85–136.

11. Serres, M. (1982), The Parasite, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, USA.

12. Zielinski, S. (2019), Archäologie der Medien: Zur Tiefenzeit des technischen Hörens und Sehens, Transl. by Skuratov, B., Ad Marginem Press, Muzej sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh”, Moscow, RUS.

13. Kirby, J. (2016), “As If, or, Using Media Archaeology to Reimagine Past, Present, and Future: An Interview with Lori Emerson”, International J. of Communication, vol. 10, pp. 3216–3229.


Review

For citations:


Ocheretyany K.А. Symbiotes of the Digital Environment: to the Epidemiological Theory of the Interface. Discourse. 2022;8(4):29-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-29-41

Views: 317


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)