Regional Specificity of the Personality of the Bribe-Giver: the Experience of Sociological Analysis

Introduction. A sociological analysis of the personality of the bribe-giver is given based on the study of data on the Republic of Mordovia. The relevance of the issue is determined by the following factors: the strengthening of the negative impact of corruption on all aspects of society and the state; the social mimicry of corruption, the stability of ideas in society about the ambivalence of corruption. The purpose of the article is to highlight the regional specifics of the identity of the bribe-giver.

Methodology and sources. The neoclassical paradigm of the study of corruption links corruption phenomena with the decomposition of the state apparatus and the erosion of the moral foundations of society. In this vein, the authors explore the dual nature of corruption, that is, its conditionality by both the government and society. In the context of Durkheim's anomie theory, the motivational complex of bribe-takers is analyzed.

Results and discussion. The objectives of the study required a mass survey (n = 400, ∆ ±5%), which represented the composition of the population of the region by gender, age, type of activity and type of locality. Within the framework of the study, a qualitative and quantitative description of the corrupt behavior of the bribe-giver was carried out, his motivational complex was revealed, and his subjective assessment of the dynamics of corruption and the effectiveness of anti-corruption policy was revealed. The following regional features of the personality of the bribe-giver are revealed: the age of the highest economic and social lability, the average level of corruption activity, the low size of the average amount of a bribe, acting as the initiator of a corrupt bribe, the perception of a bribe as a rational means of solving problems, pronounced negativism in assessing the authorities.

Conclusion. Participation in corrupt transactions imposes a more or less pronounced imprint on the personality of the bribe-giver, which consists in the deformation of the practices of relations with representatives of state bodies, the gradual loss of immunity to criminal or semi-criminal activities, the partial degradation of socially significant moral values, the transformation of corrupt practices from a social anomie to a social norm.

1. Kitova, D.A., Jouravlev, A.L., Sosnin, V.A. and Yurevich A.V. (2017), “Corruption as the phenomenon of socio-psychological research: its status and prospects of development”, Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences Social and economic psychology, vol. 2, no. 3 (7), pp. 7–38.

2. Glinkina, S.P. (2010), Corruption: A Fatal Threat?, Neekonomicheskie grani ekonomiki: nepoznannoe vzaimovliyanie Non-Economic Facets of the Economy: the Unknown Interference, in Bogomolov, O.T. (ed.), Institut ekonomicheskikh strategii, Moscow, RUS, pp. 427–455.

3. Pustovit, R.V. (2017), “Types of corruption”, HERALD OF OMSK UNIV. Series «LAW», no. 1 (50),

4. pp. 204–205.

5. Kiselev, I.Y. and Zueva, S.V. (2018), “The Perception of Corruption by the Russians as the Social Problem”, Vlast’ (The Authority), vol. 26, no 8, pp. 169–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31171/vlast.v26i8.6063.

6. Kashkarov, A.A. (2017), “Victual ambivalence, by the example of bribery”, VICTIMOLOGY, no. 2 (12), pp. 35–38.

7. Mozhina, O.Yu. (2016), “Bribe giver as a subject of the corruption process”, Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi nauki, no. 2 (10), pp. 65–68.

8. Sharapov, R.D. and Komarov, V.B. (2020), “Acceptance of a bribe for assisting actions (inaction) in favor of a bribegiver: the object of influence of the bribetaker”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Juridical Academy, no. 1 (46), pp. 107–111.

9. Sidorenko, E.L. (2016), “Polyfactorial corruption index in the Russian regions: methodology of estimation”, Actual Problems of Economics and Law, no. 3, pp. 207–215. DOI: 10.21202/1993-047X.10.2016.3.207-215.

10. Kirpichnikov, A.I. (2004), Rossiiskaya korruptsiya Russian corruption, Yuridicheskii tsentr Press, SPb., RUS.

11. Durkheim, E. (1966), “Norm and pathology”, Sotsiologiya prestupnosti. Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii Sociology of crime. Modern bourgeois theories, Transl. by Nikiforov, A.S. and Yakovlev, A.M., Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 39–44.

12. Shediy, M.V. (2011), “Basic theoretical approaches to the study of corruption”, Central Russian J. of Social Sciences, no. 2, pp. 72–82.

13. Afaunov, A.Z. (2016), “Youth and the problem of corruption in modern Russian society: sociological analysis”, Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, no. 4, pp. 15–18.

14. Makeev, Ya.A. (2013), “Institutional features of corruption in the local community”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Sociology) dissertation, NCFU, Stavropol', RUS.

15. Korruptsiya v Respublike Mordoviya: vospriyatie naseleniem i otrazhenie v SMI: byulleten' Corruption in the Republic of Mordovia: public perception and reflection in the media: bulletin (2019), in Fadeeva, I.M. (ed), Izd-vo Mord. gos. un-ta, Saransk, RUS.

16. Kupriyanov, I.S. (2010), “Corrupt practices of the population of the region: gender aspect”, Woman in Russian Society, no. 3, pp. 36–46.

17. Kirillov, S.I. (2014), “Problems of a criminal personality and the social structure of society” // BULLETIN OF THE KOLOMNA INSTITUTE (BRANCH) OF THE MOSCOW POLYTECHNIC UNIV. SERIES: SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, no. 9, pp. 73–77.

18. Tavokin, E.P. (2014), “RUSSIAN CORRUPTIONIST: SOCIOLOGICAL DIMENSION”, Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 2 (120), pp. 87–95. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2014.1.08.

19. Nikifоrova, O.A. (2019), “Public perception of corruption level in professional spheres”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Univ. Sociology, vol. 12, iss. 1, pp. 51–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2019.104.

20. Durkheim, E. (2018), Le Suicide, Transl. by A. N. Il'inskii, AST, Moscow, RUS.

21. Dyatlova, N.K. and Tsader, Ya.A. (2015), “Corruption as an institute of communication in the ‘principal – agent’ model”, Bulletin of Kemerovo State Univ., vol. 5, no. 2 (62), pp. 209–213.

22. Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (2009), “Corruption as Perceived and Experienced: Russia as a Test Case”, The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions, no. 3 (101), pp. 22–33.

23. Shediy, M.V. (2016), “Corruption and population: the problem of understanding and evaluating the degree of distribution in the Russian society”, Central Russian J. of Social Sciences, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 10–20. DOI: 10.12737/19373.