Hermeneutics and its New Tendencies: to the Question of Aesthetic Paradigm Change
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-4-5-16
Abstract
Introduction. The work examines the main vector of development of contemporary literary and hermeneutics studies. The main aim is to show how the view of the text has changed and what are the important tools in the process of its interpretation.
Methodology and sources. Firstly, various philosophical and literary approaches to texts are considered. One of the main ideas behind the research method is the comparison of the modernist, post-modernist and meta-modernist paradigm in the process of text interpretation. Another important aspect is the consideration of symptomatic and surface reading, as an important tool in the discussion of whether the text bears any meaning apart from the directly deducable and what is the most contemporary if not the best way of interpreting it. Most texts analyzed are literary examples, mainly taken from Anglophone literature.
Results and discussion. The results of the research state a number of tendencies in the view of contemporary hermeneutics. Among the general conclusion of the shift from modernist to post-modern and meta-modern patterns in the narrative. Regarding the process of text interpretation what is stated is a general tendency to see the surface l evel of the text as bearing all the necessary and important meanings. The older and more conservative approach of bringing meaning into the text is also at work, depending on the traditions. Elimination of text interpretation (or denying it its original im portance) is also an important point of view, as it states that a literary text explains more than any supporting attempt of its explanation. Another important feature is a tendency of a modern literary text to adopt characteristics of poetry. The psychoanalytic view is competing with post-modernist or meta-modernist view.
Conclusion. Metamodernist tendency, surface reading and attention to the literary text itself, and not its further explanation seems to be the core of a contemporary view of literary texts, their interpretation and, hense, meaning.
About the Author
N. F. Shcherbak
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nina F. Shcherbak – Can. Sci. (Philology) (2015), MA in English language teaching (Lancaster, UK), Associate Professor at the Department of English Philology and Cultural Studies. The author of more than 150 scientific publications, monographs and books. Area of expertise: contemporary literary theory, narratology, cognitive linguistics.
7/9 University emb., St. Petersburg 199034
References
1. Hassan, I. (1987), “Toward a Concept of Postmodernism”, The postmodern turn: essays in postmodern theory and culture, Ohio State Univ. Press, Columbus, USA, pp. 84–96.
2. Deleuze, G. (1998), Razlichie i povtorenie [Différence et Répétition], Transl. by Man’kovskaya, N.B., Yurovskaya, E.P., Petropolis, SPb., RUS.
3. Vermeulen, Т. and van den Akker, R. (2010), “Notes on Metamodernism”, Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, vol. 2, iss. 1, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.
4. Groys, B. (2015), O novom. Opyt ekonomiki kul’tury [Über das Neue. Versuh einer Kulturökonomie], Transl. by Zborovskaya, T., Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, RUS.
5. Khrushcheva, N.A. (2020), Metamodernizm v muzyke i vokrug nee [Metamodernism in and around music], Ripol-classic, Moscow, RUS.
6. Lavrova, S.V. (2013), «Logika smysla» novoi muzyki. Opyt strukturno-semanticheskogo analiza na primere tvorchestva Khel’muta Lakhenmanna i Sal’vatore Sharrino [“The logic of meaning” of new music. The experience of structural and semantic analysis on the example of the work of Helmut Lachenmann and Salvatore Sharrino], SPbSU, SPb., RUS.
7. Best, S. and Marcus, S. (2009), “Surface Reading: An Introduction”, Representations, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2009.108.1.1 .
8. Fetterley, J. (1978), Resisting reader. A feminist approach to American literature, Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, USA.
9. Showalter, E. (1997), “Towards a feminist poetics”, Twentieth century literary theory, in Newton, K.M., MacMillan, N.Y., USA, pp. 216–219.
10. Fanon, F. (1952), “The Negro and Psychopathology”, Black Skin, White Masks, Éditions du Seuil, Paris, France, pp. 141–209.
11. Fanon, F. (1965), The Wretched of the Earth, Macgibbon and Kee, London, UK.
12. Boehmer, E. (1989), “Postcolonialism”, Modern Literary theory, in Rice, Ph. and Waugh, P. (eds.), Bloomsbury Academic, London, UK, pp. 340–361.
13. Eliot, T.S. (1975). “Tradition and the Individual talent”, Selected Prose, in Kermode, F. (ed.), Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, N.Y., USA, pp. 37–44.
14. Eliot, T.S. (1975), “The functions of criticism”, Selected Prose, in Kermode, F. (ed.), Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, N.Y., USA, pp. 68–76.
15. Pound, E. (1963), A Collection of critical essays, in Salton, W. (ed.), Prentice Hall, N.J., USA.
16. Winterson, J. (1991), Oranges are not the only fruit, Vintage, London, UK.
17. Hiraga, M.K. (1994), “Diagrams and metaphors: Iconic aspects in language”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 22, pp. 5–21.
18. Winterson, J. (2019), Frankissstein: a Love Story, Vintage Digital, Rochester, UK.
19. Griffin, S.M. (2016), Spare and found parts, Greenwillow books, London, UK.
20. Felman, S. (2003), “ Writing and Madness. Literature, philosophy, psychoanalysis”, Meridian. Crossing Aesthetics, in Hamacher, W. (ed.), Stanford Univ. Press, Palo Alto, California, pp. 141–183.
21. Hallward, P. (2010), Deleuze and Psychoanalysis. Philosophical essays on Deleuze’s debate with psychoanalysis, Leuven Univ. Press, available at: http://s357a.blogspot.com/2012/02/vs.html (accessed 28.02.2021).
Review
For citations:
Shcherbak N.F. Hermeneutics and its New Tendencies: to the Question of Aesthetic Paradigm Change. Discourse. 2021;7(4):5-16. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-4-5-16
Views:
509
Email this article 