Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

The Role of Imagery in Film Creation (on the Example of Technical Images in Western Sci-Fi Films)

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-2-108-117

Abstract

Introduction. The paper deals with the peculiarities of the technical image nomination in western sci-fi films. The aim of the paper is to analyse the means of rendering of the technical imagery in modern films. The scientific topicality is in treating the subject of the paper in the light of the modern cognitive approach to image conceptualization, which is studied with the aim of demonstrating the individual specific picture of the world of the film creation. The study is centered around technical images from western films about computers and mechanisms. The topicality of the study is defined by the invariably high level of popularity of the technical sphere in the modernity by comparison with other (natural, biological) semantic spheres.

Methodology and sources. The paper makes use of specific linguistic methods of observation, description, qualitative count and the universal method of comparison. The unique method of conceptual modelling allows to reconstruct reality objects behind certain technical images. The method “from the opposite” questions the trend to activate certain thematic fields in image nomination whilst other are left unheeded. The fact basis of the study is formed from more than 500 technical images of the modern English language, found by means of solid selection from more than 30 feature film scripts, dealing with the world of technology based on the site scripts.com.

Results and discussion. The analysis of technical imagery in western film discourse was carried out with the help of cognitive and discoursive methods, disclosing evaluational statements of film characters aimed at solving the topical issues in films. The analysis demonstrated that thanks to its implicit nature the image is able to render the emotional condition, to give direction to thought process, to provide wide program of information processing accompanied by the freedom of choice. Evaluational categories of expressiveness and imagery are used by directors and scriptwriters in assessment and adaptation of the collective knowledge and schemes in personal conceptual system of the film character in the process of the rendering of the personal vision of the world.

Conclusion. The use of cognitive and discoursive methods allowed to identify the role of images in film production. The image doesn’t belong to the secondary background knowledge, it is situated in the middle between the secondary and the significant, enabling the knowledge with the element of emotion. The implicitness of images in films stimulates thinking, directs the search of lost plot lines, lays the basis for the disclosure of the director’s vision. The image allows the viewer to be active and the process of viewing become a kind of common creation, common drawing of the image.

About the Author

S. A. Pankratova
Saint Petersburg State Institute of Film and Television
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Pankratova – Dr. Sci. (Philology) (2014), Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages

13 Pravda str., St Petersburg 191119



References

1. Schultz, D.P. and Schultz, S.E. (2002), Istoriya sovremennoi psikhologii [A History Of Modern Psychology], in Nasledov, A.D. (ed.), Transl. by Govorunov, A.V., Kuzin, V.I. and Tsaruk, L.L., Evraziya, SPb., RUS.

2. Pirs, Ch.S. (2000), Logicheskie osnovaniya teorii znakov [Logical foundations of the theory of signs], Transl. by Kiryushchenko, V.V. and Kolopotin, M.V., Aleteiya, SPb., RUS.

3. Kozlova, L.А. (2018), “The phenomenon of iconicity in the language: semiotic, cognitive and communicatiove aspects (on the material of the English language)”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 1 (54), pp. 47–55.

4. Berestnev, G.I. (2007), Slovo, yazyk i za ikh predelami [Word, language and beyond], IKBFU, Kaliningrad, RUS.

5. Boldyrev, N.N. (2014), Kognitivnaya semantika: vvedenie v kognitivnuyu lingvistiku [Cognitive semantics: introduction to cognitive linguistics], TSU, Tambov, RUS.

6. Jaynes, J. (1976), The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind, Houghton Miffin, Boston, USA.

7. Fauconnier, G. (1994), Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

8. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought, Basic Books, N.Y., USA.

9. Mio, J.S. (1997), “Metaphor and Politics”, Metaphor and Symbol, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2.

10. Nierenberg, G.I. (1996), Iskusstvo tvorcheskogo myshleniya [The Art of Creative Thinking], Popurri, Minsk, Belarus.

11. Pesina, S.A. (2020), “The Concept “Semantic Invariant" as a Cognitive Term”, Discourse, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 125–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-2-125-135.

12. Popova, Z.D. and Sternin, I.А. (2007), Yazykoznanie [Linguistics], АSТ: Vostok-Zapad, Moscow, RUS.

13. Cassirer, E. (1998), Izbrannoe. Opyty o cheloveke [Favorites. Experiments about human], Gardarika, Moscow, RUS.

14. Ageev, S.V. (2002), “Metaphor as a factor of pragmatics of speech communication”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Ling.) dissertation, Herzen University, SPb, RUS.

15. Dem’yankov, V.Z. (1983), “Understanding as an interpretive activity”, Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Questions of linguistics], no. 6, pp. 58–67.

16. Molchanova, G.G. (1998), “Cognitive problems of categorization: convolution of meaning and capacity of the text”, Kognitivnaya lingvistika: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya [Cognitive linguistics: Current state and development prospects], 1 Mezhdunarodnaya shkola-seminar po kognitivnoi lingvistike [1st international school-seminar on cognitive linguistics], part 1, Tambov, RUS, 26–30 May 1998, pp. 48–51.

17. Moskvin, V.P. (2007), Russkaya metafora: Ocherk semioticheskoi teorii [Russian Metaphor: An Outline of Semiotic Theory], LKI, Moscow, RUS.

18. Karasik, V.I. (2004), Yazykovoi krug: lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse], Gnozis, Moscow, RUS.

19. Wilkinson, P.R. (2002), Thesaurus of Traditional English Metaphors, Routledge, N.Y., USA.

20. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. et al. (1999), Longman grammar of spoken and written English, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, Essex, UK.

21. Yuzefovich, N.G. (2015), “Communicative imbalance in political discourse: from conceptual derivation to conceptual aberration”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 4, pp. 88–93.

22. “Gamer”, KinoPoisk, available at: https://www.kinopoisk.ru/film/325393 (accessed 07.09.2020).

23. “Gamer”, Scripts, available at: https://www.scripts.com/script/gamer_8764 (accessed 07.09.2020).


Review

For citations:


Pankratova S.A. The Role of Imagery in Film Creation (on the Example of Technical Images in Western Sci-Fi Films). Discourse. 2021;7(2):108-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-2-108-117

Views: 378


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)