Topology of the Home: an Experiment in Phenomenological Research into the Boundaries of Human Existence

Introduction. The article is devoted to a philosophical-anthropological analysis of the phenomenon of the Home as a response to the technological challenge. The aim is to reveal the ontological status of the Home as a space of human existence, the boundaries of which are eroding in the context of digitalization. The scientific novelty lies in the development of the concept of “anthropic space” and the consideration of the Home as a topos of rootedness. The relevance is determined by the anthropological crisis associated with the delegation of cognitive and creative functions to technology.

Methodology and sources. The research is based on a phenomenological approach. The analysis draws on the concepts of M. Heidegger (dwelling, care), M. Scheler (corporality), M. Merleau-Ponty (phenomenology of perception), P. Florensky (the home as a “synthetic instrument”), and G. Bachelard (“the poetics of space”). The method of philosophical hermeneutics allows for the interpretation of the Home through multiple semantics: empirical, axiological, social, cultural, psychological, and mythological.

Results and discussion. It is shown that the Home is a space of authentic existence where the “fourfold” (Geviert) gathers. It performs the function of an “external body” (exobody) for both the individual and the community, ensuring the subject's autonomy. The loss of the Home leads to the replacement of existence with mere functioning. It is argued that virtualization and mobility destroy the topology of the Home, depriving human existence of its rootedness.

Conclusion. The conclusion is drawn that overcoming the anthropological crisis is possible through the restoration of the Home as an “oikos” (a humanized cosmos). The response to the technological challenge is the integration of technologies into the space of existence, the center of which remains the Home. The preservation of the human essence is achieved through the effort of dwelling, care, and creativity within the boundaries of the Home.

1. Shhipulin, V.O. (2023), “Biopolitical Technologies of Power in the Digital Age”, Memoirs of Novgorod State Univ., no. 3 (48), pp. 255–260. DOI: 10.34680/2411-7951.2023.3(48).255-260.

2. Smirnov, S.A. (2023), “Virtual Reality as a Transformed Form”, Philosophy J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21–38. DOI: 10.21146/2072-0726-2023-16-1-21-38.

3. Baudrillard, J. (1999), Le système des objets, Transl. by Zenkin, S., Rudomino, Moscow, RUS.

4. Braudel, F. (2007), Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XVe–XVIIIe siècle. T. 1. Les structures du quotidien: le possible et l’impossible, Ves' Mir, Moscow, RUS.

5. Zamchalova, I.Yu. (2023), “Artificial Intelligence: Risks and Perspectives for Culture”, Intellect. Innovation. Investments, no. 5, pp. 102–110. DOI: 10.25198/2077-7175-2023-5-102.

6. Konstantinov, D.V. (2024), “Artificial Intelligence: is Anthropological Catastrophe Coming?”, Herald of Omsk Univ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 32–44. DOI: 10.24147/1812-3996.2024.4.32-44.

7. Gagarin, A.S. (2009), “Phenomenological topic: meaning-of-life space existentials of human life”, Nauch. ezhegodnik In-ta filosofii i prava Ural. otd-niya Ros. akad. nauk, iss. 9, pp. 7–26.

8. Husserl, E. (2009), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch, Transl. by Mikhailov, A.V., Akademicheskii Proekt, Moscow, RUS.

9. Scheler, M. (1994), “Der Mensch im Weltalter des Ausgleichs”, Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works], Transl. by Denezhkin, A.V., Malinkin, A.N. and Fillipov, A.F., in Denezhkin, A.V. (ed.), Gnozis, Moscow, RUS, pp. 98–128.

10. Scheler, M. (1994), “Die Stellung des Menschen im Kosmos“, Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected Works], Transl. by Denezhkin, A.V., Malinkin, A.N. and Fillipov, A.F., in Denezhkin, A.V. (ed.), Gnozis, Moscow, RUS, pp. 129–193.

11. Heidegger, M. (1997), Sein und Zeit, Transl. by Bibikhin, V.V., Ad Marginem, Moscow, RUS.

12. Heidegger, M. (2020), “Building, Dwelling, Thinking“, Transl. by A. Kolesnikova, J. of Frontier Studies, no. 1 (17), pp. 157–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-0225-2020-10011.

13. Podoroga, V.A. (1993), Metafizika landshafta. Kommunikativnye strategii v filosofskoi kul'ture XIXXX vv. [Metaphysics of Landscape. Communicative Strategies in the Philosophical Culture of the 19th–20th Centuries], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

14. Mamardashvili, M.K. (1990), Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu [How I Understand Philosophy], Progress, Moscow, USSR.

15. Maslow, A.H. (2019), Motivation and Personality, 3rd ed., Transl., Piter, SPb., RUS.

16. Foucault, M. (1999), Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison, Transl. by Naumov, V., in Borisova, I. (ed.), Ad Marginem, Moscow, RUS.

17. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999), Phénoménologie de la perception, Transl. by Vdovina, I.S. and Fokin, S.L. (ed.), Yuventa, Nauka, SPb., RUS.

18. Polomoshnov, A.F. and Molokanov, A.A. (2023), “Postmodernist Revision of Traditional Corporeality”, Society: Philosophy, History, Culture, no. 1, pp. 40–46. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2023.1.5.

19. Florenskii, P.A. (1993), “Organoprojection”, Russkii kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoi mysli [Russian Cosmism: An Anthology of Philosophical Thought], Pedagogika-Press, Moscow, RUS, pp. 149–162.

20. Razava, A.L. (2023), “Topology of Ethos: Anthropology Study of the Phenomenon of Home”, DISCOURSE, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 29–43. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-6-29-43.

21. Foucault, M. (2021), Histoire de la sexualité, 4. Les aveux de la chair, Transl., Ad Marginem Press, Moscow, RUS.

22. Bourdieu, P. (2004), “La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement”, Zapadnaya ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya: Khrestomatiya sovremennoi klassiki [Western Economic Sociology: A Reader of Modern Classics], comp. and sci. ed. by Radaev, V.V., Transl. by Dobryakova, M.S. et al., ROSSPEN, Moscow, RUS, pp. 537–565.

23. Chesnokova, L.V. (2023), ““Home as a "Third Skin": Local Privacy Practices””, Herald of Omsk Univ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 71–76. DOI: 10.24147/1812-3996.2023.28(4).71-76.

24. Shorkin, A.D. (2024), “On the History of the Proliferation of Things”, Scientific Notes of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Philosophy. Political Science. Cultural studies, vol. 10, special issue, pp. 154–166.

25. Heidegger, M. (1993), “Das Ding”, Sein und Zeit, Transl. by Bibikhin, V.V., Respublika, Moscow, RUS, pp. 316–326.

26. Buber, M. (2024), Ich und Du, Transl. by Anvaer, A., AST, Moscow, RUS.

27. Harman, G. (2015), The Quadruple Object, Transl. by Morozov, A. and Myshkin, O., Gile Press, Perm, RUS.

28. Razava, E.L. (2023), ““The Problem of Defining the Concept of "Ethos". Philosophical Aspect””, Review of Omsk State Pedagogical Univ. Humanitarian Research, no. 3 (40), pp. 43–49. DOI: 10.36809/2309-9380-2023-40-43-49.

29. Ionesov, V.I. (2025), “Rexistentia as an Origin: Some Culturological Clarifications”, Culture and Arts Herald, no. 1 (81), pp. 51–60.

30. Ionesov, V.I. (2024), “The Objective World in the Dialogue of Man and Thing: Some Culturological Clarifications”, Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Univ., no. 4 (486), pp. 12–22. DOI: 10.47475/1994-2796-2024-486-4-12-22.

31. Karsavin, L.P. (1992), Religiozno-filosofskie sochineniya. T. 1 [Religious and Philosophical Works. Vol. 1], Renessans, Moscow, RUS.

32. Podoroga, V.A. (1995), Vyrazhenie i smysl. Landshaftnye miry filosofii [Expression and Meaning. Landscape Worlds of Philosophy], Ad Marginem, Moscow, RUS.

33. Bachelard, G. (2004), La Poétique de l'espace, Transl. by Kislov, N.V. et al., ROSSPEN, Moscow, RUS.

34. Jung, C.G. (2006), Der Mensch und seine Symbole, Transl. by Sinitsina, I.N., Udovik, S.L. and Zelenskii, V.V., in Sinitsina, S.N. (ed.), Serebryanye niti, Moscow, RUS.

35. Hall, E.T. (1979), The Hidden Dimension, Transl. by Rudnev, M.A., Progress, Moscow, RUS.

36. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. (2014), A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction, Transl. by Syrova, I., Studiya Artemiya Lebedeva, Moscow, RUS.

37. Motorina, L.E. (2018), “A Man as Anthropological Integrity: Methodology of Research”, Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial Univ., no. 4, pp. 44–49. DOI: 10 26794/2226- 7867-2018-8-4-44-49.

38. Le Corbusier (1977), Vers une architecture, Transl. by Topuridze, K., Progress, Moscow, USSR.

39. Baudrillard, J. (2015), Simulacres et Simulation, Transl. by Kachalov, A., POSTUM, Moscow, RUS.

40. Urry, J. (2012), Mobilities, Transl. by Lazarev, A.V., Praksis, Moscow, RUS.

41. Makimoto, T. and Manners, D. (1997), Digital Nomad, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NY, USA.

42. Pogrebnyak, A. (2024), “Distraction vs Cosiness: on the digital homelessness in relation to the concept of Shoshana Zuboff”, Logos, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 235–256. DOI: 10.17323/0869-5377-2024-6-235-254.

43. Eliade, M. (1999), Patterns in Comparative Religion, Transl. by Bogina, Sh.A. et al., Ladomir, Moscow, RUS.

44. Campbell, J. (1997), The Hero with a Thousand Faces, Transl., AST, Moscow, RUS.