Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

From Hero to Victim: Commemorative Practices of Post-Heroic Society

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-5-5-18

Abstract

Introduction. In modern academic literature, interest in the phenomena of collective memory and commemoration has been growing. The mental experience of the past has a political dimension and can influence value orientations and life strategies of the present and future. The aim of this article is to examine the transformations in commemorative practices within Western societies that can be classified as post-heroic. Methodology and sources. The article employs a philosophical and interdisciplinary methodology (methodological principles of social constructivism, perspectivism, discourse analytical approach). The theoretical analysis engages with works related in the field of social and political philosophy and intellectual history. Results and discussion. The features of war commemoration in the narratives of the victors and the vanquished, which serve as sources of socio-political inclusion and exclusion, are examined. The distinctive feature of commemorative practices in Western post-heroic societies is the construction of a victim identity that encompasses both participants in military actions and victims of armed violence. In post-heroic societies, the memory of heroic self-sacrifice (sacrificium) is supplanted by the memory of passive victims (victimae), which is manifested in war narratives. The role of intellectuals in shaping the victim identity of German society is highlighted. Sequences of victim representations leading to the proliferation of victim identity are examined. Conclusion. It is argued that the figure of the military hero has a selective integrative potential, whereas the figure of the victim becomes a source of reconciliation between nations that once fought on opposing sides of the front. Heroic commemorative practices are an organic element of the memory of a victorious war. Self-victimization of the victors in World War II can be interpreted as a renunciation of the legacy victory, while the self-victimization of the vanquished signifies a renunciation of responsibility for the crimes of war

About the Author

N. A. Balakleets
Samara State Technical University
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Balakleets – Can. Sci. (Philosophy, 2011), Docent (2018), Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Social Sciences and Humumanites



References

1. Le Goff, J. (2013), Histoire et mémoire, Transl. by Akopyan, K.Z., ROSSPEN, Moscow, RUS.

2. Münkler, H. (2018), Kriegssplitter: Die Evolution der Gewalt im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert, Transl. by Loskutova, A.I., Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, RUS.

3. Balakleets, N.A. (2024), Voina i ee transformatsii v sovremennom obshchestve: opyt politiko-filosofskogo analiza [War and its transformations in modern society: an experience of political and philosophical analysis], Aleteiya, SPb., RUS.

4. Amery, J. (2015), Jenseits von Schuld und Sühne: Bewältigungsversuche eines Überwältigten, Transl. by Ebanoidze, I., Novoe izd-vo, Moscow, RUS.

5. Levi, P. (2010), I sommersi e i salvati, Transl. by Dmitrieva, E.B., Novoe izd-vo, Moscow, RUS.

6. Assmann, A. (2014), Der lange Schatten der Vergangenheit: Erinnerungskultur und Geschichtspolitik, Transl. by Khlebnikov, B., Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, RUS.

7. Hüppauf, B. (2001), “Der moderne Krieg und das Irrationale“, Schuld und Sühne? : Kriegserlebnis und Kriegsdeutung in deutschen Medien der Nachkriegszeit (1945–1961), Rudopi, Amsterdam, DEU, pp. 155–171.

8. Assmann, A. (2016), Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur, available at: https://litresp.ru/chitat/ru/%D0%A5/hlebnikov-boris-nikolaevich/novoe-nedovoljstvo-memorialjnoj-kuljturoj/2 (accessed 03.04.2025).

9. Luttwak, E. (2012), Strategy: the logic of war and peace, Transl. by Koval', A.N. and Platoshkin, N.N., Russkii fond sodeistviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, Moscow, RUS.

10. Bröckling, U. (2018), “Postheroische Helden? Konturen einer Zeitdiagnose”, Kulturelle Grundlagen von Integration, available at: https://www.exc16.uni-konstanz.de/postheroische-helden.html (accessed 17.06.2025).

11. Münkler, H. and Fischer, K. (2000), “Nothing to kill or die for...» – Überlegungen zu einer politischen Theorie des Opfers“, Leviathan, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 343–362.

12. Thiemeyer, T. (2010), “Zwischen Helden, Tätern und Opfern. Welchen Sinn deutsche, französische und englische Museen heute in den beiden Weltkriegen sehen“, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 462–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/gege.2010.36.3.462.

13. Knobloch, C. (2020), “Die Figur des Opfers und ihre Transformation im politischen Diskurs der Gegenwart“, Zeitschrift für Politik, vol. 67, iss. 4, pp. 455–472. DOI: doi.org/10.5771/0044-3360-2020-4-455.

14. Fromm, E. (1994), Anatomie der menschlichen Destruktivität, Transl. by Telyatnikova, E.M., Respublika, Moscow, RUS.

15. Balakleets, N.A. (2023), “The invisible enemy: from metaphor to concept”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Univ. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 410–422. DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2023.301.

16. Sabrow, M. (2008), “Heroismus und Viktimismus. Überlegungen zum deutschen Opferdiskurs in historischer Perspektive“, Potsdamer Bulletin für Zeithistorische Studien, no. 43/44, pp. 7–20.

17. Jaspers, K. (1999), Die Schuldfrage, Transl. by Apt, S., Progress, Moscow, RUS.

18. Bibó, I. (2004), “A német hisztéria okai és története”, Transl. by Nagy, N., O smysle evropeiskogo razvitiya i drugie raboty [On the meaning of European development and other works], Tri kvadrata, Moscow, RUS, pp. 7–154.

19. Jung, С.G. (1997), “Essays on Contemporary Events”, Transl. by Dmitriev, D.V., Bozhestvennyi rebenok: Analiticheskaya psikhologiya i vospitanie [The Divine Child: Analytical Psychology and Education], AST-LTD, Moscow, RUS, pp. 60–176.

20. Clausewitz, С. (1994), Vom Kriege, Transl. by Rachinskii, A., Logos, Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

21. Grausamkeit und Metaphysik. Figuren der Überschreitung in der abendländischen Kultur (2009), Schaub, M. (Hg.), transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, DEU.

22. Ricoeur, P. (2004), La mémoire, l'histoire, l'oubli, Transl. by Blauberg, I.I., Vdovina, I.S., Machul'skaya, O.I. and Tavrizyan, G.M., Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoi literatury, Moscow, RUS.

23. Bauman, Z. (2010), Modernity and the Holocaust, Transl. by Kastal'skii, S. and Rudakov, M., Evropa, Moscow, RUS.

24. Arendt, H. (2014), On Violence, Transl. by Dashevskii, G.M., Novoe izdatel'stvo, Moscow, RUS


Review

For citations:


Balakleets N.A. From Hero to Victim: Commemorative Practices of Post-Heroic Society. Discourse. 2025;11(5):5-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-5-5-18

Views: 29


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)