Citespace-Based Bibliometric Analysis of Englishes: Insights and Trends

Introduction. The paper examines English in its diverse roles as a national language, a medium for international and intercultural exchange, a practical communication tool for non-native speakers, and a subject of various research programs associated with its functional varieties. The research aims to provide a structured overview of studies on English varieties and their roles within the fields of World Englishes (WE), Global English (GE), English as a Lingua Franca (ELF), and English as an International Language (EIL). The objective of this paper is to summarize achievements in the study of English variation and offer insights for future research.

Methodology and sources. Empirically, the study draws on data from 2008 to 2024 extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection, analyzed using Citespace to visualize trends and patterns within the field.

Results and discussion. The findings reveal that research on WE, GE, ELF, and EIL has been characterized by interdisciplinary and multi-institutional collaboration. The recognition of the polycentric nature of modern English has elevated the status of its varieties, whose phonetic characteristics and pragmatic applications are increasingly integrated into education.

Conclusion. The research has revealed a steady rise in the scholarly interest in the problem of language variation, particularly as exemplified by the English language. This resulted in positive shifts in the World Englishes positioning and reception both in the theoretical and applied fields. However, unresolved issues and research gaps remain, as identified in the study.

1. Crystal, D. (2003), English as a global language, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, NY, USA.

2. Mohr, S. (2007), “Plural nouns in Tswana English”, World Englishes, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 705–725. DOI: 10.1111/weng.12246.

3. Bello, H., Yap, N.T., Chan, M.Y. and Nimehchisalem, V. (2020), “Intelligibility of English Vowels Produced by Nigerian and Malaysian Speakers”, Research in Applied Linguistics, vol. 11, iss. 2, pp. 81–94. DOI: 10.22055/RALS.2020.15948.

4. Daria, S.Y., Choi, I. and Lee, Y. (2019), “Modal Usage of Advanced Korean EFL Learn-ers, Young Korean EFL Learners, and Native English Speakers: A Corpora Comparison Study”, Language and Linguistics, no. 85, pp. 23–54. DOI: 10.20865/20198502.

5. Zhou, J. and Lin, J. (2023), “A Visualized CiteSpace Analysis on Eye-Tracking in Language Studies Abroad”, Int. J. of Education and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 327–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i3.14923.

6. Chen, C. (2016), Citespace: A Practical Guide for Mapping Scientific Literature, Nova Publishers, NY, USA.

7. He, C. and Wei, X. (2019), “Study of Corpus' Influences in EAP Research (2009-2018): A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace”, English Language Teaching, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 59–66. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v12n12p59.

8. Jia, S., Harji, M. B. and Lu, Z. (2023), “Comparative Study on Task-Based Teaching and Learning: A Scientometric Analysis in CiteSpace”, Environment-Behaviour Proceedings J., vol. 8, no. 25, pp. 47–54. DOI: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8i25.4832.

9. Tan, S.N., Harji, M.B. and Zhang, S.X. (2023), “Research Status, Hotspots and Trends of Business English Writing in China: A Bibliometric Analysis Via CiteSpace”, Environment-Behaviour Proceedings J., vol. 8, no. 26, pp. 113–119. DOI: 10.21834/e-bpj.v8i26.5122.

10. Hamid, M.O. (2015), “The Linguistic Market for English in Bangladesh”, Current Issues in Language Planning, vol. 17, iss. 1, pp. 36–55. DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1105909.

11. Hamid, M.O. and Kirkpatrick, A. (2016), “Foreign Language Policies in Asia and Australia in the Asia Century”, Language Problems and Language Planning, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 26–46. DOI: 10.1075/lplp.40.1.02ham.

12. Szmrecsanyi, B. (2009), “Typological Parameters of Intralingual Variability: Grammatical Analyticity versus Syntheticity in Varieties of English”, Language Variation and Change, vol. 21, iss. 3, pp. 319–353. DOI: 10.1017/S0954394509990123.

13. Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B. and Röthlisberger, M. (2016), “Around the World in Three Alternations: Modeling Syntactic Variation in Varieties of English”, English World-Wide, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 109–137. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1886.0248.

14. Christou, E., Thomas, N. and McKinley, J. (2022), “Chinese Pre-service English Teachers’ Beliefs about English as an International Language (EIL)”, J. of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, vol. 45, iss. 10, pp. 4166–4181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2148681.

15. Piller, I. and Cho, J. (2013), “Neoliberalism as Language Policy”, Language in Society, vol. 42, iss. 1, pp. 23–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000887.

16. Lee, J.S. (2019), “Teacher as Change Agent: Attitude Change toward Varieties of English through Teaching English as an International Language”, Asian Englishes, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 87–102. DOI: 10.1080/13488678.2018.1434396.

17. Evans, B.E. and Imai, T. (2011), “‘If we say English, that means America“: Japanese Students” Perceptions of Varieties of English””, Language Awareness, vol. 20, iss. 4, pp. 315–326. DOI: 10.1080/09658416.2011.592590.

18. Isbell, D.R. and Crowther, D. (2023), “Revisiting US Undergraduate Perceptions of Non-native English Varieties: from Millennials to Generation Z”, Applied Linguistics, vol. 44, iss. 2, pp. 287–311. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amac048.

19. Young, T. and Walsh, S. (2010), “Which English? Whose English? An Investigation of ”non-native” Teachers” Beliefs about Target Varieties”, Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 123–137. DOI: 10.1080/07908311003797627.

20. Ambele, E.A. and Boonsuk, Y. (2020), “Voices of Learners in Thai ELT Classrooms: a Wake up Call towards Teaching English as a Lingua Franca”, Asian Englishes, vol. 23, iss. 2, pp. 201–217. DOI: 10.1080/13488678.2020.1759248.

21. Salazar, D. (2021), “Documenting World Englishes in the Oxford English Dictionary: Past Perspectives, Present Developments, and Future Directions”, Research Developments in World Englishes, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, UK, pp. 271–294. DOI: 10.5040/9781350167087.CH-013.

22. Richards, J.C. and Pun, J. (2023), “A Typology of English-medium Instruction”, RELC J., vol. 54, iss. 1, pp. 216–240. DOI: 10.1177/0033688220968584.

23. Aizawa, I. and Rose, H. (2020), “High School to University Transitional Challenges in English Medium Instruction in Japan”, System, vol. 95: 102390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102390.

24. Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., Altay, M. and Curle, S. (2023), “A Longitudinal Study at an English Medium Instruction University in Turkey: the Interplay between English Language Improvement and Academic Success”, Applied Linguistics Review, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 533–552. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2020-0097.

25. Rose, H., McKinley, J. and Galloway, N. (2021), “Global Englishes and Language Teaching: A Review of Pedagogical Research”, Language Teaching, vol. 54, iss. 2, pp. 157–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000518.

26. Boonsuk, Y., Ambele, E.A. and McKinley, J. (2021), “Developing Awareness of Global Englishes: Moving away from ”native standards” for Thai University ELT”, System, vol. 99: 102522. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2021.102511.

27. Curry, M.J. and Lillis, T. (2022), “Multilingualism in Academic Writing for Publication: Putting English in its Place”, Language Teaching, vol. 57, iss. 1, pp. 87–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000040.