Types of Attributive Constructions in Middle English Poetry
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-157-169
Abstract
Introduction. The research focuses on attributive constructions functioning in Middle English poetic texts. The analysis of the identified attributive structures using a morphological approach is carried out. The main aim is to identify the types of attributive constructions characteristic of poetic texts of the Middle English period and describe their peculiarities.
Methodology and sources. The research is carried out on the material of the original text of Geoffrey Chaucer's ‘The Canterbury Tales’ and the text of its modern adaptation, presented on the website of Harvard University. The total volume of the investigated fragment of the original text is 6105 words. Attributive constructions were selected in accordance with the classification proposed by V.L. Kaushanskaya. The final corpus of attributive constructions was obtained using the method of continuous sampling and totalled 396 unique attributive constructions. At the second stage of the study, quantitative analysis of the identified attributive constructions was carried out in order to determine their percentage ratio in the text fragment selected for analysis.
Results and discussion. The most frequent type of attributive construction is the model in which the role of the attribute is performed by the adjective (37 %). The least frequent are the types of attributive constructions in which the attribute is expressed by: 1) a noun in the nominative case (≈ 1 %); 2) a numeral (≈ 1 %). The vast majority of the identified constructions belong to the prepositional type (70 %).
Conclusion. The analysis of attributive constructions based on the material of poetic texts of the Middle English period shows that the attribute could be expressed: 1) by an adjective; 2) by a possessive pronoun or noun in the genitive case; 3) using constructions with a prepositional group. As for the position of the attribute relative to the core of the construction, in addition to the prepositive and postpositive types characteristic of Modern English, a number of “exceptions” were identified in G. Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales” in which the conventional type of the attribute relative to the core is reversed, which reflects the specifics of the Middle English language, which was experiencing a period of rapid development and cardinal changes in the structure of language on the way to the formation of the literary norm. Further studies on the evolution of types and peculiarities of attributive constructions based on the material of Middle English and Early Modern English poetry seem extremely promising.
About the Authors
E. A. NilsenRussian Federation
Evgeniia A. Nilsen – Dr. Sci. (Philology, 2015), Professor (2016), Head of the Department of English Philology and Translation, Saint Petersburg State Economic University.
30–32 Griboyedov Canal emb., letter A, St Petersburg 191023
I. K. Mashko
Russian Federation
Ignatiy K. Mashko – Postgraduate at the Department of English Philology and Translation, Saint Petersburg State Economic University.
30–32 Griboyedov Canal emb., letter A, St Petersburg 191023
References
1. Arakin, V.D. (2005), Sravnitel'naya tipologiya angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov [Comparative typology of English and Russian languages], 3rd ed., Fizmatlit, Moscow, RUS.
2. Kirillova, E.B. (2017), “Attributive constructions as one of the most widespread types of free word combinations in modern English. The main methods of their translation into Russian”, The main problems of the humanities, Collection of Scientific Papers on the Results of the int. Scientific-Practical Conf., Volgograd, RUS, pp. 26–29.
3. Kazakovtseva, O.S. (2020), “The location of the components of the attributive phrase in the Old Russian monuments of the XI-XIII centuries (on the material of the texts of the epistolary genre and the Old Russian eloquent)”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, PetrSU, Petrozavodsk, RUS.
4. Yartseva, V.N. (1990), Lingvisticheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' [Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary], Sov. entsiklopediya, Moscow, USSR.
5. Sinkevich, D.A. (2010), “Attributive constructions in modern linguistics: problems of definition and analysis”, Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi nauki [Actual issues of modern science], no. 12, pp. 239–248.
6. Tkachenko, A.V. (2020), “Attributive word combinations from the viewpoints of traditional and cognitive approaches (by the material of the English language)”, Philology. Theory & Practice, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 80–86. DOI: 10.30853/filnauki.2020.4.17
7. Proskura, Yu.V. (2006), “Attributive constructions in the German language: cognitive and functional aspects”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, KuzSPA, Novokuznetsk, RUS.
8. Ivanova, I.P., Burlakova, V.V. and Pocheptsov, G.G. (1981), Teoreticheskaya grammatika sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka [Theoretical Grammar of Modern English], Vyssh. shkola, Мoscow, USSR.
9. Kaushanskaya, V.L., Kovner, R.L., Kozhevnikova, O.N. et al. (2008), A Grammar of the English Language, Airis Press, Moscow, RUS.
10. “Harvard’s Geoffrey Chaucer Website”, Harvard Univ., available at: https://chaucer.fas.harvard.edu/pages/general-prologue-0 (accessed 19.08.2024).
Review
For citations:
Nilsen E.A., Mashko I.K. Types of Attributive Constructions in Middle English Poetry. Discourse. 2025;11(2):157-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-157-169