Definition of the Content Core of Synonymic Series of English-Language Terms in the Field of Construction Equipment
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-142-156
Abstract
Introduction. This article is devoted to the definition of the content core of synonymous series of English-language terms in the field of construction equipment as one of the methods of studying this terminology system from the point of view of its features and structure. The relevance of the work is due to the growing need to study the terminology system “Construction equipment” in order to train specialists with competencies in the field of design, repair, modernization, and operation of construction machines arriving in the territory of the Russian Federation from abroad. The basis for conducting the study was also the lack of cognitive studies related to the terminology system “Construction equipment”.
Methodology and sources. The methodological basis of the study was: a survey, corpus analysis, definitional analysis, comparative analysis. The author uses a quantitative approach to provide statistical data necessary to demonstrate some of the research results. This study is also based on the concepts of D.S. Lotte (in the field of synonymy in technical terminology), as well as I.K. Arkhipov (definition of the concept of “Content core”). The sources used were operating manuals for such types of construction equipment as Hydraulic excavator, front loader, excavator-loader. The survey was conducted on July 10, 2024, at the ATLET company (57 specialists with the necessary competencies in the field of construction equipment participated in the survey).
Results and discussion. In the course of this study, the hypothesis: “If the content core of the selected dominant term of the synonymous series coincides with the content core of the entire synonymous series, then this fact can be the basis for defining this dominant as such” was not confirmed.
Conclusion. The terminology system “Construction equipment” is poorly studied from the point of view of the cognitive approach at this stage. In this regard, various difficulties may be identified in the process of research, slowing down the process of finding an answer to the question about the nature and features of this terminology. This study is an attempt by the author to identify some contradictions that arise in the process of studying construction and technical terminology and to highlight them for a wide range of professionals whose area of interest includes cognitive terminology.
About the Author
V. A. RodinRussian Federation
Valentin A. Rodin – Postgraduate at the Department of Romano-Germanic Philology and Lingvodidactics, Pushkin Leningrad State University.
10 Petersburgskoye hig, Pushkin, 196605 St Petersburg
References
1. Superanskaya, A.V., Podolskaya, N.V. and Vasilyeva, N.V. (2012), General Terminology: Theoretical problems, 6th ed., Librokom, Moscow, RUS.
2. Reformatsky, A.A. (1967), “Term as a member of lexical system”, Problemy strukturnoi lingvistiki [Problems of structural linguistics], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 103–125.
3. Leichik, V.M. (2009), Terminovedenie. Predmet, metody, struktura [Terminology. Subject, methods, structure], 4th ed., LIBROKOM, Moscow, RUS.
4. Averboukh, K. (2006), General Theory of the Term, 2nd ed., Izd-vo MGOU, Moscow, RUS.
5. Komarova, Z.I. (1991), Semanticheskaya struktura spetsial'nogo slova i ee leksikograficheskoe opisanie [Semantic structure of a special word and its lexicographic description], Sverdlovsk, RUS.
6. Novodranova, V.F. (2003), “Problems of term formation in the cognitive-communicative“, Leksikologiya. Terminovedenie. Stilistika [Lexicology. Terminology. Stylistics], Pressa, Moscow, Ryazan’, RUS, pp. 150–155.
7. Kiseleva, S.V. (2009), Sushchnost' mnogoznachnogo slova v angliiskom yazyke [The essence of a polysemantic word in English], Asterion, SPb., RUS.
8. Taranova, E.N., Bubyreva, Zh.A. and Taranov, A.O. (2016), “Problem of Synonymy in Professional Terminology”, TSPU Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 55–60.
9. Grinev, S.V. (2000), “Terminology on the threshold of the third millennium”, Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya terminologiya [Scientific and technical terminology], iss. 1, VNIIKI, Moscow, RUS, pp. 31–34.
10. Apresyan, Yu.D. (1974), Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka [Lexical semantics. Synonymous means of language], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
11. Nikitin, M.V. (2007), Kurs lingvisticheskoi semantiki [Course of linguistic semantics], Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, SPb., RUS.
12. Arnol’d, I.V. (1959), Leksikologiya sovremennogo angliiskogo yazyka [Lexicology of the modern English language], 3rd ed., Izd-vo literatury na inostrannykh yazykakh, Moscow, USSR.
13. Kiseleva, S.V., Kononova, I.V. and Trofimova, N.A. (2022), Leksikologiya angliiskogo yazyka: uchebnik [Lexicology of the English language], Publishing house UNECON, SPb., RUS.
14. Kiseleva, S.V. (2012), “On the issue of synonymy”, Actual problems of linguistics and humanities, Materials of the Int. Scientific Methodological Conf., Moscow, RUS, 23 March 2012, pp. 46–60.
15. Rusinova, L.N. (1985), “On some issues of streamlining and standardization of terminology (terminological synonymy)”, Terminy v yazyke i rechi [Terms in language and speech], Izd-vo GGU, Gor'kii, USSR, pp. 25–31.
16. Pesina, S.A., Kiseleva, S.V., Rudakova, S.V., Vinogradova, S.A. and Trofimova, N.A. (2022), “Speech communication in terms of cognition”, Revista De Investigaciones Universidad Del Quindío, no. 34 (S3), pp. 82–89. DOI: 10.33975/riuq.vol34nS3.1000.
17. Golovanova, E.I. (2015), “Cognitive variation in the sphere of professional nomination”, Cognitive studies of language, iss. 22, pp. 631–633.
18. Tolikina, E.I. (1971), “Some Linguistic Problems of Term Study”, Lingvisticheskie problemy nauchno-tekhnicheskoi terminologii [Linguistic Problems of Scientific and Technical Terminology], Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 57–67.
19. Bushev, A.B. (2002), “Lingvo-didactic problems of terminology in military translation”, Terminology and translation in the 21st century, Materials of the Int. Scientific Conf., Omsk, RUS, 26–28 June 2002, pp. 30–35.
20. Pesina, S.A., Vinogradova, S.A., Kiseleva, S.V. et al. (2021), “Functioning of Metaphor through the Prism of Invariant Theory of Polysemy”, Applied Linguistics Research J., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 247–252. DOI: 10.14744/alrj.2021.34356.
21. Vorona, I.I. (2013), “On question of terminological synonymy”, Philology. Theory & Practice, no. 3 (21), in 2 parts, part II, pp. 50–54.
22. Lotte, D.S. (1961), Osnovy postroeniya nauchno-tekhnicheskoi terminologii: voprosy teorii i metodiki [Basics of constructing scientific and technical terminology: issues of theory and methodology], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow, USSR.
23. CT195 CT230 CT260 Operating Manual (2020), available at: https://carter-russia.ru/katalog/srednie-ekskavatory/carter-ct195-2/?ysclid=m7jgt445us265226449 (accessed 12.10.2024).
24. CT135 CT160 Operating Manual (2020), available at: https://carter-russia.ru/katalog/srednie-ekskavatory/carter-ct195-2/?ysclid=m7jgt445us265226449 (accessed 12.10.2024).
25. CT108 CT10 Operating Manual (2023), available at: https://carter-russia.ru/katalog/srednie-ekskavatory/carter-ct195-2/?ysclid=m7jgt445us265226449 (accessed 12.10.2024).
26. Cambridge Dictionary, available at: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bucket (accessed 10.12.2024).
27. Merriam Webster dictionary, available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary (accessed 10.12.2024).
28. Collins Dictionary, available at: https://www.collinsdictionary.com./ (accessed 10.12.2024).
29. Construction Machinery Glossary, available at: http://www.theconstructionmachinery.com/glossary.html (accessed 10.12.2024).
30. Construction Equipment and its Management, available at: https://readersend.com/product/construction-equipment-and-its-management/ (accessed 10.12.2024).
Review
For citations:
Rodin V.A. Definition of the Content Core of Synonymic Series of English-Language Terms in the Field of Construction Equipment. Discourse. 2025;11(2):142-156. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-142-156