Characteristics of Discourses of Helping Professions
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-132-141
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines the role of an agent of therapeutic influence and analyzes the features of discourses of helping professions (with their agents: psychologist, psychotherapist, doctor, teacher, shaman, lawyer) in modern therapeutic practices with clients in situations of various types of assistance. The purpose of this article is to analyze the varieties of the language of discourses of helping professions. The Russian linguist V.I. Karasik distinguishes medical discourse in the institutional discourses, and considers psychotherapeutic one as its variety. Meanwhile, at the present stage of the development of discourse analysis, it is possible to supplement some tactics and linguistic approaches to clients in the discourses of helping professions (DHP) in connection with the new paradigm of natural sciences – the complex consideration of a man as a biosocial, mass, cosmic being. Hence, therapists show the deep interest in the most ancient archaic types of discourse – magical, meditative, religious, etc.
Methodology and sources. The article is based on the main provisions of the theories of V.I. Karasik and Ten van Dijk. The methodological basis of the analysis carried out in the article were scientific works that deal with psychotherapeutic discourse (A.R. Markin, M.S. Grineva, E.V. Ermolaeva), medical one (M. Foucault, V.V. Zhura, O.A. Shesterikova, V.G. Silantieva), law discourse (M. Foucault, V.G. Ishchenko, M.S. Medvedeva, S.A. Zimina), pedagogical (E.T. Bulgakova, K.A. Vospishcheva, L.M. Osinovskaya), magical (G. Storms and F. Grandon, E.G. Ermolaeva, M.L. Cameron), meditative (M.G. Eremchenko, O.A. Dmitrieva, E.N. Melnikova).
Results and discussion. The article characterizes and highlights the specifics of various DHP, describes the features of language techniques that used in these discourses, depending on the goals of influencing the client.
Conclusion. The study shows the specifics of the DHP, primarily related to the goals and objectives in different cultures and ambiguous situations of therapeutic practice.
About the Author
I. V. ShugayloRussian Federation
Irina V. Shugaylo – Can. Sci. (Philosophy, 1996), Docent (2008), Methodist of the International Project “Class”, The Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia.
48 Moika emb., St Petersburg 191186
References
1. Shesterikova, O.A. (2014), “Transformation of medical discourse in modern European culture”, Cand. Sci. (Philology) Thesis, SPbSU, SPb., RUS.
2. Shugaylo, I.V. and Vezhleva, E.K. (2024), “Images of a doctor and a patient in medical discourse integrated into fiction works”, VII Int. Scientific and Practical Conf., Penza, RUS, 23–24 Apr. 2024, pp. 495–498.
3. Zhura, V.V. (2008), “Discursive emotions in oral medical communication”, World of Linguistics and Communication: Electronic Scientific J., no. 10, pp. 13–23.
4. Shugaylo, I.V. (2024), “Conceptual Metaphors in Psychotherapeutic Discourse (Using the Example of the Works of Art by Irwin Yalom and Ken Kesey)”, DISCOURSE, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 152–163. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2024-10-3-152-163.
5. Silanteva, V.G. (2019), “Messages of Sympathy in Instagram Accounts of Cancer Patients”, Filologicheskii aspekt [Philological aspect], no. 9 (53), pp. 70–79.
6. Karasik, V.I. (2002), Yazykovoi krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs [Language circle: personality, concepts, discourse], Peremena, Volgograd, RUS.
7. Ermolaeva, E.V. (2017), “Meditative, magical, psychotherapeutic and religious discourses in comparative coverage”, Philology. Theory & Practice, no. 2-2 (68), pp. 124–126.
8. Shugurov, M.V. and Mozzhilin, S.I. (2023) “Comprehension of religious and mystical experience within the framework of analytical psychology: refraction of the universalist paradigm”, Philosophical Thought, no. 2, pp. 64–101. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2023.2.39749
9. Grendon, F. (1909), Anglo-Saxon Charms, Grandon Felix, NY, USA.
10. Bauman, L.C. (1990), “The hermeneutics of mystical discourse”, PhD dissertation, The Univ. of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA.
11. Wierzbicka, A. (2020), “Addressing God in European Languages: Different meanings, different cultural attitudes”, Russian J. of linguistics, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 259–293. DOI: 10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-2-259-293.
12. Shugaylo, I.V. (2024), “Dreams as an element of mental health (on the example of psychological novels by Irwin Yalom)”, Russia and the world community: problems of demography, ecology and public health, VII Int. Sci. Conf., Penza, RUS, 15–16 July 2024, pp. 310–314.
13. Cameron, M.L. (1993), Anglo-Saxon Medicine, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, NY, USA.
14. Cherepanova, I. (1999), Dom koldun'i. Yazyk tvorcheskogo Bessoznatel'nogo [The Witch's House. The Language of the Creative Unconscious], KSP+, Moscow, RUS.
15. Hill, C. and Regan, A. (1991), “The Use of Metaphors in One Case of Brief Psychotherapy”, J. of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy, no. 10, pp. 56–57.
Review
For citations:
Shugaylo I.V. Characteristics of Discourses of Helping Professions. Discourse. 2025;11(2):132-141. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2025-11-2-132-141