Issues of Developing the Socio-Philosophical Foundations of the Educational Space

Introduction. In fact, any ideological or methodological construction represents a certain system of knowledge, including initial concepts, rules for constructing statements and conclusions of derivative judgments, which, after the necessary discussion and confirmation, take the form of a universal belief. The methodology for developing unified prolegomena in the description of the modern educational space, stated in world socio-political philosophy and in the philosophy of education, meets similar criteria. This need requires clarifying how and in what way, with the help of rational philosophical thought, it is possible and necessary to develop a methodology that unites the categorical apparatus of numerous educational systems.

Methodology and sources. The description of the unified categorical foundations of the educational space is carried out in the ontological, epistemological and axiological content of the priorities represented by the modern educational space.

Results and discussion. The methodology of globalism in social philosophy and in the philosophy of education is theoretically organized and hierarchized. In general, it includes the interests and needs, meanings and values of the subjects of knowledge. The discovery of fundamental guidelines in the ontological, epistemological and axiological priorities of philosophical and educational discourse in matters of building a global educational space necessitates a critical philosophical assessment of globalization theoretical and methodological approaches from the point of view of the socio-noospheric methodology of cognition. This is important when developing unified categorical frameworks for describing the educational space.

Conclusion. The methodological potential of the philosophy of education as a humanistic basis for the development of humankind has high heuristic significance in the aspect of the dialectics of the media space with the possibilities of education integrated into it. A single categorical space, framed in the methodology of ontology, epistemology and axiology of education, in practical implementation is capable of being projected into the mass world perception and worldview, based on the in-depth development of the socio-noospheric methodology of the educational space.

1. Bolotova, U.V. (2015), “Philosophy of modernity – origins and influence”, Innovation Science, no. 3, pp. 188–191.

2. Sombart, W. (2023), Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Modernen Kapitalismus, Transl. by Kuznitsyn, D.V., Vladimir Dal‘, Moscow, RUS.

3. Subetto, A.I. (2000), Kapitalokratiya. Filosofsko-ekonomicheskie ocherki [Capitalocracy. Philosophical and economic essays], Izd-vo Kostroms. gos. un-ta, Kostroma, RUS.

4. Yakovleva, I.V. (2022), “Formulation of the conceptual foundations of the axiosystem of the Russian educational space”, Filosofskie, sotsiologicheskie i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya [Philosophical, sociological and psychological-pedagogical problems of modern education], Materialy IV Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Materials IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf.], Barnaul, RUS, 18–19 Nov. 2022, pp. 167–172. DOI: 10.37386/2687-0576-2022-4-167-172.

5. An, S.A., Glios, G.N., Dik, V.P. et al. (2019), “Social vectors existence of our time”, Vestnik Instituta razvitiya noosfery [Bulletin of the Institute for Noosphere Development], no. 5 (7), pp. 5–47.

6. Khalev, V.V. (2012), “The topical problems of transformation of the society and education”, Professional education in the modern world, no. 3 (6), pp. 7–13.

7. Chumakov, A.N. (2006), Metafizika globalizatsii. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnyi aspekt [Metaphysics of globalization. Cultural and civilizational aspect], Prospekt, KANON+, Moscow, RUS.

8. An, S.A., Kagirov, B.N., Naumov, R.Yu. et al. (2019), “Critical method update scientific and philosophical analysis of modern intellectual products in the context of globalization on the way to the noosphere”, Vestnik Instituta razvitiya noosfery [Bulletin of the Institute for Noosphere Development], no. 3 (5), pp. 5–56.

9. Ursul, A.D. and Ursul, T.A. (2013), “V.I. Vernadsky and Global-Noospheric Studies”, Sociodynamics, no. 3, pp. 318–365. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.3.383.

10. Karako, P.S. (2007), Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki: V. I. Vernadskii. Uchenie o biosfere [Philosophy and methodology of science: V. I. Vernadsky. The doctrine of the biosphere], Eko-perspektiva, Minsk, BLR.

11. Dugin, A.G. (2013), Teoriya mnogopolyarnogo mira [Theory of a multipolar world], Eurasian Movement, Evraziiskoe dvizhenie, Moscow, RUS.

12. Il'in, I.P. (2001), Postmodernizm. Slovar' terminov [Postmodernism. Glossary of terms], INION RAS, INTRADA, Moscow, RUS.

13. Zhang, Yu. and Yakovleva, I.V. (2024), “The potential and heuristic significance of the media space in the context of universal education”, Philosophy of Education, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 56–73. DOI: 10.15372/PHE20240204.

14. Zhang, Yu. (2024), Prosveshchenie v Kitae: gorizonty razvitiya v epokhu novykh media [Education in China: horizons of development in the era of new media], Izd-vo NGPU, Novosibirsk, RUS.

15. Zhang, Yu. (2021), “New media as an indicator of the cultural development of the audience”, Modern Humanities Success, no. 7, pp. 244–247.

16. Vereshchagin, O.A and Belova, N.E. (2015), “Frame analytics: the experience of epistemological research”, Scientific notes of the Oryol State Univ., no. 6 (69), pp. 302–306.

17. Yakovleva, I.V. and Chernykh, S.I. (2023), “Dialectics of changes in the axiosystem of Russian education in the transition period”, Tomsk State Univ. J., no. 497, pp. 57–64. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/497/6.

18. Rykov, A.V. (2011), “Modernist art: the main principles”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Univ. Ser. History, no. 4, pp. 51–57. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17048482.

19. Rykov, A.V. (2014), “Modernist art and the idea of progress”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg Univ. Ser. History, no. 3, pp. 73–82.

20. Ashilova, M.S. and Nalivaiko, N.V. (2013), Filosofiya obrazovaniya Vostoka i Zapada: razvitie dialoga [Philosophy of education of East and West: the development of the dialogue], Publishing house SB RAS, Novosibirsk, RUS.

21. Ushakova, E.V., Kagirov, B.N., Kosenko, T.S. and Yakovleva, I.V. (2022), “On the way to the health of society. Part 2. The search for the foundations of the balance of human life and society in a new worldview format (the ends of the universe and the sociocons of being)”, Philosophy of Education, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 22–41. DOI: 10.15372/PHE20220302.

22. Zhang, Yu. (2021), “Traditional media: horizons of development in the era of new media”, World of science, culture, education, no. 3 (88), pp. 491–493. DOI: 10.24412/1991-5497-2021-388-491-493.

23. Yakovleva, I.V., Kosenko, T.S. and Mayer, B.O. (2022), Filosofiya obrazovaniya: slovar'-spravochnik [Philosophy of education: dictionary-reference book], Izd-vo NGPU, Novosibirsk, RUS.

24. Ivanova, S.V. (2014), “Modern educational space in socio-cultural and geopolitical aspects”, Values and meanings, no. 2 (30), pp. 40–49.