Digital Inequality: Current Trends in Formation and Research

Introduction. At the beginning of the XXI century, information and communication resources appear, under the influence of which the intensive digitalization of society begins and, as a result, the transformation of most social phenomena: processes, institutions, communities, etc. The purpose of the article is to analyze digital inequality as a type of social inequality based on existing sociological approaches in domestic and foreign science. The main problem lies in the lack of systematization of scientific publications analyzing approaches to defining the concept, mechanism of occurrence and social consequences of digital inequality.

Methodology and sources. The research methodology is based on a sociological and interdisciplinary approaches. The reports of the United Nations, the Okinawa Charter of the Global Information Society, and the World Bank are used as a source base. In the domestic field, the development of a methodology for research on digital inequality was undertaken by O.M. Slepova, T.S. Martynenko, O.N. Vershinskaya, O.V. Volchenko and others. Western discourse is primarily represented by the ideas of the J. Van Dijk, P. DiMaggio, M. Castells, E. Hargitay, D. Garip. The works of Chinese researchers Huang Rongui, Gui Yun, Chen Yongson, Yan Hui, etc. are analyzed.

Results and discussion. There had been revealed a direct dependence between the growth of the level of economic development and the growth of the level of digital inequality. The role of digitalization, which makes cardinal adjustments to the classical criteria for analyzing the social structure of society, was also revealed. It is shown that, in contrast to the growth of digital inequality, social support connections are formed, which involve equalizing relationships to the potentials of the information space.

Conclusion. Digital inequality, as a phenomenon that appeared at the turn of the century, continues to intensify and has a direct impact on the development of new forms of social inequality. New criteria of inequality are being added to the traditional ones, and a new profile of social stratification is being formed.

1. “World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends” (2016), The World Bank Group, available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/896971468194972881/pdf/102725-PUB-ReplacementPUBLIC.pdf (accessed 01.06.2024).

2. Van Deursen, A. and Van Dijk, J. (2015), “New Media and the Digital Divide”, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Wright, J.D. (ed.), Elsevier, NY, USA, pp. 787– 792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.95086-4.

3. Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T. and Bacao, F. (2012), “Digital Divide across the European Union”, Information & Management, vol. 49, iss. 6, pp. 278–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.09.003.

4. Polozhikhina, M.A. (2017), “Information and Digital Inequality as a New Type of Socio-economic Differentiation of Society”, Economic and Social Problems of Russia, no. 2, pp. 119–142.

5. “Racial divide continues to grow: Falling through the Net. Defining the digital divide” (1999), National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, USA, available at: https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/data/fttn99/FTTN.pdf (accessed 16.07.2024).

6. “Falling through the Net: A survey of the «Have nots» in rural and urban America” (1995), National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, USA, available at: https://www.ntia.gov/page/falling-through-net-survey-have-nots-rural-and-urban-america (accessed 25.07.2024).

7. “Falling through the Net II: New data on the digital divide” (1998), National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, USA, available at: https://www.ntia.gov/page/fallingthrough-net-ii-new-data-digital-divide (accessed 02.08.2024).

8. Kostina, N.B. and Chizhov, A.A. (2023). “Digital Divide During the Digitalization of the Educational Process: a Sociological Aspect”, Surgut State Pedagogical Univ. Bulletin, no. 1 (82), pp. 48– 59. DOI: 10.26105/SSPU.2023.82.1.005.

9. “Okinawan Charter of the Global Information Society” (2000), Diplomatic J., no. 8, pp. 51–56.

10. “Okinawan Charter of the Global Information Society” (2001), Razvitie informatsionnogo obshchestva v Rossii. T. 2: Kontseptsii i programmy [Development of the Information Society in Russia. Vol. 2: Concepts and Programs], in Borisov, N.V. and Khokhlov, Yu.E. (eds.), SPbSU, SPb., RUS, pp. 63–71.

11. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya informatsionnogo prostranstva Privolzhskogo federal'nogo okruga [Problems and prospects for the development of the information space of the Volga Federal District] (2001), Materials of a Scientific Conf., 11–12 April 2001, Perm, RUS.

12. Grinyaev, S.N. (2004), “Digital inequality of nations”, Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie [Independent Military Review], 30.01.2004, available at: https://nvo.ng.ru/concepts/2004-01-30/4_ information.html (accessed 18.08.2024).

13. Pimenova, D.V. (2007), “Information Inequality in Modern Russian Society (Socio-Territorial Aspect)”, Can. Sci. (Sociology) Thesis, PenzGTA, Penza, RUS.

14. Burnaeva, E.M. and Solomatova, S.N. (2022), “Digital Career Guidance as a Necessary Reality”, Education Management Review, no. 1 (47), pp. 34–44. DOI: 10.25726/j5344-2121-8154-v.

15. DiMaggio, P. and Hargittai, E. (2001), From the «digital divide» to «digital inequality»: Studying Internet use as penetration increases, available at: https://digitalinclusion.typepad.com/digital_inclusion/documentos/digitalinequality.pdf (accessed 05.05.2024).

16. Park, S. and Kim, G. (2015), “Same Access, Different Uses, and the Persistent Digital Divide between Urban and Rural Users”, The 43rd Research Conference on Communication, Information and Inter-net Policy (TPRC), Arlington, VA, USA, 25–27 Sep. 2015, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2582046 (accessed 23.07.2024).

17. DiMaggio, P. and Garip, F. (2012), “Network effect and social inequality”, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 38, pp. 93–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545.

18. Peacock, S.E. (2008), “The Historical Influence of Computer Use at Work on Income in the Late Twentieth Century”, Social Science Computer Review, vol. 26, iss. 3, pp. 334–349. DOI: 10.1177/0894439307309285.

19. Dubinina, M.G. (2017), “Impact of information technology on the dynamics of employment in russia and abroad”, Science Governance and Scientometrics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 109–133.

20. Aranzhin, V.V. (2019), “The Relationship of Wages and Productivity: Trends in the Conditions of Economy”, Russian J. of Labor Economics, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 523–534. DOI: 10.18334/et.6.1.39938.

21. Park, S. (2017), Digital Capital, Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59332-0.

22. Vartanova, E.L., Gladkova, A.A., Dunas, D.V. (2022), “Social Digital Capital as Hybrid NonMaterial Capital: Theoretical Approaches and Practical Solutions in the Russian Context”, Questions of Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 6–26. DOI: 10.17150/2308-6203. 2022.11(1).6-26.

23. Kudryavtseva, T.Yu. and Kozina, K.S. (2021), “Basic Concepts of Digitalization”, Vestnik akademii znanii [Bulletin of the Knowledge Academy], no. 44 (3), pp. 149–151. DOI: 10.24412/2304-6139-2022-11228.

24. Grishaeva, S.A. (2020), “Social transformations within the conditions of digital environment”, Moscow State Univ. Bulletin. Ser. 18. Sociology and Political Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 70–81. DOI: 10.24290/1029-3736-2020-26-1-70-81.

25. Buzgalin, A.V. and Kolganov, A.I. (2019), “Social Structure Transformation of Late Capitalism: From Proletariat and Bourgeoisie Towards Precariat and Creative Class?”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, no. 1, pp. 18–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1.

26. Zabelina, O.V., Mayorova, A.V. and Matveeva, E.A. (2020), “The Transformation of Demand for Skills and Professions in Terms of Digitalization of the Russian Economy”, Russian J. of Labor Economics, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 589–608. DOI: 10.18334/et.7.7.110666.

27. Kurganskaya, V.D. and Dunaev, V.Yu. (2021), “Digitalization as a Modeling System of Social Stratification”, Social Novelties and Social Sciences, no. 1 (3), pp. 46–64. DOI: 10.31249/snsn/2021.01.05.

28. Osipova, N.G., Vershinina, I.A. and Martynenko, T.S. (2019), “Inequality and Uncertainty: Current Challenges for Cities”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, no. 1, pp. 153–155. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003758-6.

29. Ivanov, D.V. (2021), “New Approach to Assessment of Social Development”, Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, no. 1, pp. 50–62. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250010462-1.

30. Cartier, C., Castells, M. and Qiu, J.L. (2005), “The Information Have-Less: Inequality, Mobility and Translocal Networks in Chinese Cities”, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 9–34. DOI: 10.1007/BF02686292.

31. Rains, S. and Tsetsi, E. (2017), “Social Support and Digital Inequality: Does Internet Use Magnify or Mitigate Traditional Inequities in Support Availability?”, Communication Monographs, vol. 84, iss. 1, pp. 54–74. DOI: 10.1080/03637751.2016.1228252.

32. Vershinskaya, O.N. (2016), “New Factor of Social Stratification”, Sociopolitical Sciences, no. 2, pp. 176–180.

33. Yan, Hui, Zhou, Wenjie and Han, Shenglong (2013), “Social Capital, Digital Inequality, and a "Glocal" Community Informatics Project in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, Gansu Province”, Library Trends, no. 62, iss. 1, pp. 234–260. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2013.0031.

34. Klimovitskii, S.V. and Osipov, G.V. (2020), “Digital Inequality and its Social Consequences”, Novaya sotsial'naya real'nost': sistemoobrazuyushchie faktory, bezopasnost' i perspektivy razvi-tiya. Rossiya v tekhnosotsial'nom prostranstve [New Social Reality: System-forming Factors, Security and Prospects of Development. Russia in the Techno-social Space], Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow, SPb., pp. 47–53.

35. Shi, Yun-qing (2014), “Reproduction of digital inequality – A case study of college students’ internet use”, J. of Lanzhou University (Social Science), iss. 6, pp. 69–75.

36. Huang, R. and Gui, Y. (2009), “The internet and homeowners' collective resistance: A qualitative comparative analysis”, Sociological Studies, no. 5, pp. 29–56.

37. Chen, Yunsong (2022), “Segregation of ideas: The intra-group polarization in the cyberspace of con-temporary China”, Sociological Studies, no. 37 (4), pp. 117–135.

38. Judge, S., Puckett, K. and Bell, S.M. (2006), “Closing the Digital Divide: Update from the Early Childhood Longi-tudinal Study”, The J. of Educational Research, no. 100 (1), pp. 52–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.52-60.