Medical Research Genres in the English Academic Discourse

Introduction. The research article in English has recently been under scrutiny by theoretical and applied linguists. The understanding of research article is heterogeneous: it can be defined as a scientific manuscript, an independent text type or a separate genre. In Russian academic discourse the concept of the research article usually implies a scientific publication with the definite word count which is less than a monograph. However, this broad definition comprises a variety of heterogeneous genres. The English academic discourse, on the contrary, specifies research genres manifested in Research, Review, Editorial, Commentary, Clinical Case Report and other text names. Additionally, these research genres can vary according to the scientific discipline. The objective of this paper is to identify and classify academic research genres in medical discourse.

Methodology and sources. The research corpus was collected from the original highimpact open-access medical journals, i.e., Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, British Medical Journal, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Clinical Investigation, Brain, Pediatrics, Diabetes, Heart, Journal of Neuroscience. The research procedure involved contextual, semantic and comparative analysis of the journal requirements on the article type and content presented in typical sections About the Journal, Authors Guidelines and Table of Contents.

Results and discussion. The analysis has led to the development of differential parameters for further research genres classification. The findings have shown that a variety of research papers under different names can be classified as a system of research genres in the academic discourse represented by medical research publications. We have also found distinct correlations between medical journal requirements and linguistic characteristics of medical research genres.

Conclusion. The academic medical discourse functions in a wide spectrum of article types, which can be classified as medical research genres according to discourse parameters.

1. Swales, J. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.

2. Bloor, M. (1998), “Variations in the Method Sections of Research Articles Across Disciplines: The Case of Fast and Slow Text”, Issues in EAP Writing, Research and Instruction, The Univ. of Reading, Reading, UK, pp. 84–106.

3. Сhernyavskaya, V.E. (2016), “Scientific result in research paper in linguistics”, Speech genres, no. 1 (13), pp. 56–64. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2016-1-13-56-64.

4. Flowerdew, J. (2013), “English for Research Publication Purposes”, The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, in Paltridge, B. and Starfield, S. (eds.), Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 301–322.

5. Hyland, K. (2004), “Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing”, J. of Second Language Writing, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 133–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001.

6. Hyland, K. (2005), “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse”, Discourse Studies, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 173–191. DOI: 10.1177/1461445605050365.

7. Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2007), “Is there an “academic vocabulary”?”, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 41, iss. 2, pp. 235–253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x.

8. Hyland, K. (2008), “As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation”, English for Specific Purposes, vol. 27, iss. 1, pp. 4–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001.

9. Hirano, E. (2009), “Research Article Introductions in English for Specific Purposes: A Comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English”, English for Specific Purposes, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 240–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.02.001.

10. Martin-Martin, P. (2003), “A Genre Analysis of English and Spanish Research Paper Abstracts in Experimental Social Sciences”, English for Specific Purposes, vol. 22, iss. 3, pp. 25–43. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3.

11. Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N. and Ranta, E. (2010), “English as an Academic Lingua Franca: The ELFA Project”, English for Specific Purposes, vol. 29, iss. 3, pp. 183–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.001.

12. Emelyanova, O.P. (2019), “Genre characteristics of academic paper”, Kazan Science, no. 6, pp. 57–63.

13. Galanova, O.A. (2013), “The genre of as cientific article as a form of culture”, J. of Siberian Medical Sciences, no. 6, available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zhanr-nauchnoy-stati-kak-formakultury (accessed 21.10.2023).

14. Shamara, I.F. (2017), “Research paper: genre evolution and the modern standard”, Proceedings of the Southwest State Univ. Ser. Linguistics and Pedagogics, vol. 7, no. 1 (22), pp. 47–53.

15. Vakhterova, E.V., Stebletsova, A.O. and Boriskina, O.O. (2020), “Research discourse: genre universals and disciplinary specifics of research papers”, Proceedings of Voronezh State Univ. Ser. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 69–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.3/2935.

16. Vakhterova, E.V. and Stebletsova, A.O. (2022), “English research article: subject-specific characteristics of the results and discussion sections”, Proceedings of Voronezh State Univ. Ser. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 3, pp. 62–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17308/lic/1680-5755/2022/3/62-70.

17. Arkhipova, E.I. and Kazakova, O.A. (2013), “Genre specificity of a scientific article on linguistics (based on the material of the Russian language)”, Vestnik Nauki Sibiri, no. 1 (7), pp. 263–270.

18. Bazhenova, E.A. and Kotyurova, M.P. (2006), “Genres of scientific literature”, Stilisticheskii ehntsiklopedicheskii slovar' russkogo yazyka [Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of the Russian language], in Kozhina, M.N. (ed.), Flinta, Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 57–67.

19. Naumenko, Yu.N. and Stebletsova, A.O. (2021), “Verbalization of the scientific category of relevance in English and Russian academic discourses”, Philology and culture, no. 1 (63), pp. 84–93. DOI: 10.26907/2074-0239-2021-63-1-84-93.

20. Shamara, I.F. (2021), “The role of discoursive markers reflecting different types of logical connections in the organization of the text of a modern scientific medical article”, Theory of Language and Intercultural Communication, no. 3 (42), pp. 236–245.

21. Stebletsova, A.O. (2022), “Cognitive structures of the research text: ethnolinguistic aspect”, J. of Psycholinguistics, no. 2 (52), pp. 99–110. DOI: 10.30982/2077-5911-2022-52-2-99-110.

22. Torubarova, I.I. and Stebletsova, A.O. (2020), “Medical research article: national indicators in the universal genre of academic discourse”, Herald of Tver State Univ. Ser. Philology, no. 4 (67), pp. 145–153. DOI: 10.26456/vtfilol/2020.4.145.

23. Yagenich, L.V. (2020), “Prescriptive signs of an 18th century English-language scientific medical text”, Scientific dialogue, no. 2, pp. 178–193. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2020-2-178-193.

24. Davis, R.H. (2015), “A genre analysis of medical research articles”, PhD thesis, Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

25. Greenhalgh, T. (2001), How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine, BMJ Books, London, UK.

26. Murawska, M. (2010), “Impersonality in medical case reports”, Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres, in Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Dueñas, P. and Lafuente-Millán, E. (eds.), Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 311–325.

27. Taavitsainen, I. and Pahta, P. (2000), “Conventions of professional writing: The medical case report in a historical perspective”, J. of English Linguistics, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 60–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424002200487.

28. Wilce, J. (2009), “Medical Discourse”, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 38, pp. 199–215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164450.

29. Lancet, available at: https://www.thelancet.com/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

30. New England Journal of Medicine, available at: https://www.nejm.org/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

31. British Medical Journal, available at: https://www.bmj.com/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

32. Clinical Infectious Diseases, available at: https://academic.oup.com/cid (accessed 04.11.2023).

33. Journal of Clinical Investigation, available at: https://www.jci.org/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

34. Brain, available at: https://academic.oup.com/brain (accessed 04.11.2023).

35. Pediatrics, available at: https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics (accessed 04.11.2023).

36. Diabetes, available at: https://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

37. Heart, available at: https://heart.bmj.com/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

38. Journal of Neuroscience, available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/ (accessed 04.11.2023).

39. Fairclough, N. (2003), Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research, Routledge, NY, USA.

40. Karasik, V.I. (1998), “About the categories of discourse”, Yazykovaya lichnost': sotsiolingvisticheskiye i emotivnyye aspekty [Linguistic personality: sociolinguistic and emotive aspects], Peremena, Volgograd, RUS, pp. 185–197.

41. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (2000), Methods of text and discourse analysis, SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024480.