F. Engels and K. Marx on the Origin of Private Property and the State: One Concept or Two?

Introduction. The problem of incomplete coincidence of views of K. Marx and F. Engels has long been raised in marxology. On this topic, D. McLellan, M. Ryubel, K.N. Lubutin and P.N. Kondrashov spoke. However, they were limited to political economy and ontology. We will discuss the views of classics on the origin of private property and the state.

Methodology and sources. In this article the textual analysis of the works «Origin of family, private property and state» by F. Engels and «Forms preceding capitalist production» and «Manuscripts of 1844» by K. Marx is taken. The author a dopts a historical-comparative approach, combining the ideas of the classics with those of later Marxist schools.

Results and discussion. F. Engels explains the appearance of the state by class contradictions. However, it does not distinguish the concept of «class» from the concept of «estate» and ignores the fact that in the pre-capitalist era an individual opposed another individual as a representative of a community that provided a certain standard of living. In a paragraph entitled «Forms Preceding Capitalist Production» in the «Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1861», K. Marx describes how the state emerged as an organizer of forced community works. This coercion was determined not by socio-political factors but by natural factors. Labor created not only a social product, but also the very relationship of domination. We show the semantic connection of this concept with that which was embodied K. Marx in «Economical-philosophical manuscripts of 1844».

Conclusion. In classical Marxism there is no unified concept of the origin of the state and private property; the concepts of K. Marx and F. Engels differ from each other in the interpretation of the role of labor in this process. F. Engels attributes a passive role to labor. For K. Marx, the role of labor is active: labor itself creates its opposite, private property, and with it the state, which arises and exists due to the limitations of labor.

1. Ray, L. and Wilkinson, Ia. ( 2019), “Interview with David McLellan July 2018”, J. of Classical Sociology, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. pp. 87–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X1881058.

2. Rubel, M. (2006), Marx: critique du marxisme, Transl. by Guseva, Yu.V. Praksis, Moscow, RUS.

3. Lyubutin, K.N. and Kondrashov, P.N. (2007), Filosofskaya antropologiya Karla Marksa [Philosophical anthropology of Karl Marx], Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, Ekaterinburg, RUS.

4. Kondrashov, P.N. (2023), Devyat' mifov o filosofii Karla Marksa. Ot demifologizatsii k rekonstruktsii iznachal'nykh idei [Nine myths about the philosophy of Karl Marx. From demythologization to reconstruction of original ideas], LENAND, Moscow, RUS.

5. Engels, F. (1961), “Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Staats”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., Politizdat, Moscow, USSR, pp. 23–178.

6. Marх, K. and Engels, F. (1955), “The German Ideology”, Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR, pp. 7–544.

7. Marх, K. (1980), Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Rohentwurf) 1857–1858: Anhang, 1850-1859, part I, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

8. De Beauvoir, S. (2017), Le Deuxième Sexe, Transl. by Malakhova, I., Orlova, E. and Sabashnikova, A., Azbuka-Attika, Moscow, RUS.

9. Marх, K. (1974), “Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], vol. 42, Transl., Politizdat, Moscow, USSR, pp. 41–174.

10. Feuerbach, L. (1995), “Grundsätze der Philosophie der Zukunft”, Sochineniya [Works], in 2 vol., vol. 1, Transl. by Meerovskii, B.V. and Romashko, S.A., Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 90–146.

11. Feuerbach, L. (1995), “Vorlesungen über das Wesen der Religion”, Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Selected philosophical works], in 2 vol., vol. 2, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, RUS, pp. 490–810.

12. Koryakovtsev, A.A. and Viskunov, S.V. (2017), Marksizm i polifoniya razumov [Marxism and polyphony of minds], Kabinetnyi uchenyi, M., Ekaterinburg, RUS.

13. Engels, F. (1961), “Anti-Dühring”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., vol. 20, Transl., Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR, pp. 5–338.

14. Hobbеs, T. (1991), “Leviathan; Or The Matter, Form and Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil”, Sochineniya [Works], in 2 vol., vol. 2, Transl. by Fedorov, N. and Guterman, A., Mysl', Moscow, RUS, pp. 3–545.

15. Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1955), “Manifests der Kommunistischen Partei”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 4, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR, pp. 419–459.

16. Marx, K. ( 1962), “Das Kapital. B. III”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 25, part. 2, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR.

17. Lenin, V.I. (1970), “The Great Initiative”, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], 5th ed., vol. 39, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

18. Ilyushechkin, V.P. (1986), Soslovno-klassovoe obshchestvo v istorii Kitaya (opyt sistemnostrukturnogo analiza) [Estate-class society in the history of China (experience of system-structural analysis)], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

19. Marx, K. ( 1960), “Das Kapital. Bd. I”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 23, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR.

20. Gurevich, A.Ya. (1990), Srednevekovyi mir: kul'tura bezmolstvuyushchego bol'shinstva [The medieval world: the culture of the silent majority], Iskusstvo, Moscow, USSR.

21. “Marx to Engels, Feb. 10, 1865” (1963), Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 31, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

22. Marx, K. (1955), “Misère de la philosophie”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 4, Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR.

23. Lenin, V.I. (1970), “About the state. Lecture at Sverdlovsk University on July 11, 1919”, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works], 5th ed., vol. 39, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

24. “Archaic Greece” (1988), Istoriya Evropy in 8 vol., vol. 1, Drevnyaya Evropa [History of Europe; in 8 vol., vol. 1. Ancient Europe], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 217–258.

25. Narskii, I.S. (1983), Otchuzhdenie i trud: po stranitsam proizvedenii K. Marksa [Alienation and labor: through the pages of the works of K. Marx.], Mysl', Moscow, USSR.

26. Marх, K. (2010), Ehkonomichesko-filosofskie rukopisi 1844 g. i drugie rannie filosofskie raboty. M.: Akademicheskii proekt [Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 and other early philosophical works], Akademicheskii proekt, Moscow, RUS.

27. Marx, K. (1982), “Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte”, Marx, K., Engels, F. Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), Herausgegeben vom Institut fur Marxismus-Leninismus bein ZK der SED. Bd. 2. Dietz-Verlag. Berlin, GER, S. 363–375.

28. Marх, K. (1956), “Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte aus dem Jahre 1844”, Marх, K. and Engels, F. Iz rannikh proizvedenii [From early works], Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR.

29. Bongard-Levin, G.M. and Il'in, G.F. (1985), Indiya v drevnosti [India in ancient times], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

30. Kabo, V.R. (1966), “Formation of class society among the peoples of Oceania”, Narody Azii i Afriki, no. 2, pp. 57–68.

31. “Engels to Marx in Margate (Manchester) April 13, 1866” (1963), Marх, K. and Engels, F. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works], 2nd. ed., Transl., vol. 31, Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

32. Marх, K. (1941), “Conspectus of Lewis Morgan’s “Ancient Society”, Arhiv Marksa i Engel'sa [Marx and Engels Archive], vol. IX, OGIZ-Gospolitizdat, Leningrad, USSR. C. 1–194.

33. Skocpol, T. (2017), States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China, Transl. by Moiseev, S., Izd-vo in-ta Gaidara, Moscow, RUS.

34. Mann, M. (2018), “Mann M. Autonomous power of the state: origins, mechanisms and results”, Transl. by Gerasimov, A. and Maslovskii, M., Neprikosnovennyi zapas, no. 2, pp. 3–33.

35. Laсhmann, R. (2010), Capitalists in spite of themselves elite conflict and economic transitions in early modern Europe, Transl. by Lazarev, A., Territoriya budushchego, Moscow, RUS.

36. Jessop, B. (2019), The State Past, Present, Future, Transl. by Moiseev, S., in Karasev, D. (ed.), DELO, RANHiGS, RUS.