Motivational Portrait of Digital Generation Applicant

Introduction. The relevance of the topic is due to the need to develop principles and methods of sociological support for the process of professional self-determination of young people in the digital environment. The article presents the results of studies of socioprofessional aspirations, value orientations and motivation for acquiring a profession among modern applicants. An analysis was made of some cognitive features of school graduates that influence their choice of specialization and university.

Methodology and sources. The methodological base included the activity theories of motivation by A.N. Leontiev and L.S. Vygotsky, the psychology of the attitude of D.N. Uznadze, modern sociological studies of the rational choice of a university by applicants (L. Abdrakhmanova, E. Nikonova, J. Kinzie, M. Palmer, J. Hayek, D. Hossler, S.A. Jacob et al.). To solve the problems of analyzing the construction of the reality of higher education with the help of visual images, the authors relied on the traditions of visual sociology.

Results and discussion. The empirical basis for writing the article was the results of a seven-year monitoring (2015–2021) “Motives and factors for choosing a university by applicants for technical specialties” (N = 3700 people) of one of the leading universities in Russia – Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University. An analysis of the dynamics of the value-motivational portrait of young people showed that applicants belonging to generation Z are distinguished by mobilization motivation and pragmatic values. The hypothesis about the influence of the principle of obtaining the result “here and now” on the decisions made by future engineers from the digital generation was confirmed. The results obtained lead to the conclusion that in order to increase the level of professional motivation and attract generation Z to enroll in a university, a radical change in the field of communicative interaction from “offline” to “online” is necessary.

Conclusion. In conclusion, the authors of the article, based on the results of their research, suggest some directions for the development of communication strategies in working with applicants of the digital generation, emphasizing that an important component of the success of the communication strategy of a modern university in interaction with young people is high-quality, fast and regular feedback using message visualization tools.

1. Castells, M. (2010), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I: The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, GBR.

2. Shestakova, I.G. (2018), “Human capital in the digital age”. Scientific Journal NRU ITMO: Series “Economics and Environmental Management”, no. 1, pp. 56–63. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2018-11-1-56-63.

3. Bkhalla, A., Chakravorti, B. and Chaturvedi, R.Sh. (2021), “The most digital countries in the world”, Bol'shie idei, 12.01.2021, available at: http://hbr-russia.ru/innovatsii/trendy/p23271 (accessed 09.12.2022).

4. “Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 9, 2017 no. 203 “On the Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017–2030”” (2017), Prezident Rossii [President of Russia], available at http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41919 (accessed 09.12.2022).

5. “Passport of the priority project "Modern digital educational environment in the Russian Federation”, Pravitel'stvo Rossii [Russian Government], available at: http://static.government.ru/media/files/8SiLmMBgjAN89vZbUUtmuF5lZYfTvOAG.pdf (accessed 09.12.2022).

6. Bauman, Z. (1997), “Universitias: Old, New and Different”, The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society, Open Univ. Press, Buckingham, GBR, pp. 78–87.

7. Kulakova, A.B. (2018), “Generation Z: Theoretical Aspect”, Territorial development issues, no. 2 (42). DOI: 10.15838/tdi.2018.2.42.6.

8. Fedotova, N. (2014), “Toward the Theory of Identity as a Process”, Russian J. of Philosophical Sciences, no. 11, pp. 70-81.

9. “The share of Internet users in Russia among young people has approached 100%” (2021), RBK, available at: https://www.rbc.ru/technology_and_media/12/01/2021/5ffde01e9a79478eb5230426 (accessed 09.12.2022).

10. Strogetskaya, E.V. and Betiger, I.B. (2021), “The Smart Education Paradigm: Expected Outcomes and Real-Life Student Experience”, DISCOURSE, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 94–107. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-2-94-107.

11. “New Generation of Internet Users: A Study of Russian Youth Online Habits and Behavior”, Think with Google, available at: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/ru-ru/consumer-insights/consumer-trends/novoe-pokolenie-internet-polzovatelei-issledovanie-privychek-i-povedeniia-rossiiskoimolodezhi-onlain/ (accessed 09.12.2022).

12. “Rectors of Russian universities recognized the admission campaign as successful” (2021), Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, 17.08.2021, available at: https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/press-center/news/?ELEMENT_ID=38487 (accessed 09.12.2022).

13. Yaroshevskii, M.G. (1993), L. S. Vygotskii: v poiskakh novoi psikhologii [L.S. Vygotsky: in search of a new psychology], Mezhdunarodnyi fond istorii nauki, SPb., RUS.

14. Leont'yev, A.N. (1977), Deyatel'nost'. Soznaniye. Lichnost' [Activity. Consciousness. Personality], 2nd ed., Politizdat, Moscow, USSR.

15. Uznadze, D.N. (1966), Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological research], Moscow, Nauka, USSR.

16. Аbdrakhmanova, L.V. and Nikonova, E.I. (2017), “Main Factors Affecting the Choice of the Higher Education Institution”, The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, no. 3, pp. 113–116.

17. Kinzie, J.L., Palmer, M., Hayek, J. et al. (2004), Fifty Years of College Choice: Social, Political and Institutional Influences on the Decision-making Process, Lumina Foundation for Education, Indianapolis, USA.

18. Bogdanova, N.M. (2012), “Visual sociology”: Is it a new science or a special point of view? Sociological J., no. 3, pp. 67–79.

19. Mikov, Y.V. and Tabala, O.V. (2014), “Student’s Secondary Employment and Career Choice”, Pedagogical Education in Russia, no. 11, pp. 119–124.

20. Avakova, E. and Kuznetsov, A. (2021), “Interaction of educational institutions and organizations-employers in the context of digitalization”, Telescope: J. of sociological and marketing research, no. 1, pp. 82–88. DOI: http://doi.org/10.51692/1994-3776_2021_1_82.

21. Volegov, V.S. (2019), “Ideas of the basic school students about the socio-professional structure as an element of their readiness for professional self-determination (a case study of the Perm region)”, Perm Univ. Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology, no. 2, pp. 273–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2019-2-273-283.

22. “SPbGETU "LETI" what to do? | The first electrical engineering 10 facts” (2020), Admission Navigator. YouTube, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt_DZtyXNzg (accessed 09.12.2022).

23. “”LETI” Electrotechnical Institute | How to enter SPbGETU?” (2019), Forward for the highest! Education and universities in St. Petersburg, YouTube, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCze5DHbhIk (accessed 09.12.2022).

24. “Battle of Universities (LETI vs ITMO)” (2017), Voice Standup. YouTube, available at: https://youtu.be/56OYyi5kBFY (accessed 09.12.2022).