A New Approach to the Zero Subject in English
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-6-175-195
Abstract
Introduction. For “subject question” it is traditionally presumed, that the subject in it is the interrogative word or word combination. From logical point of view it is not correct, because the subject in such sentence is not yet found, and the interrogative word or word combination just “help” in searching for it. In English, it is marked by different syntactic means, for example, by the absence of the auxiliary verb. Also in subject question a formal particle “there” shows up; however, its functions are still unclear. That is why the objective of this work is to build a formal logical model of subject in interrogative English sentence, including the searched subjects, without or with the particle “there”.
Methodology and sources. The research methodology is based on the binomiality idea, having been developed since 1993 at ETU “LETI” by means of the method of formal-logical modelling. The examples illustrating the functional features of the searched subject in English interrogative sentence were selected by means of the method of continuous sampling from 7 corpora.
Results and discussion. The diversity of subject structures in English interrogative sentence is considered, taking into account possible functions of the formal particle “there”. The assumption is supported, that the implicit subject is a “trace” of the explicit subject and may not be considered as the absolute zero subject. It is the searched subject, which is an absolute zero subject, i.e. an inexplicit one and it is necessary to initiate specifying the notion of the zero subject with distinction of implicit and inexplicit subjects.
Conclusion. Out of dependence on its environment, the searched subject in English is an absolute zero subject, i.e. an inexplicit one. Most often it is a strong or weak vacant semifinitive, fixed in the weak specifier, or, rarer, a weak vacant semifinitive, fixed in the strong specifier. In interrogative sentences of English, no subject can be explicit or implicit when it is searched for; the auxiliary verb in the absence of emphasis or negation does not disappear, but is transformed into a flexion. In the structure of negative interrogative sentences one can see their enhanced (and, actually, maximum) energetics.
About the Authors
E. J. IbragimovaRussian Federation
Elvina J. Ibragimova – Bachelor (Linguistics, 2021), part-time Methodist at the Department of Foreign Languages
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
T. V. Shulzhenko
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Shulzhenko – Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
A. А. Shumkov
Russian Federation
Andrey А. Shumkov – Dr. Sci. (Philology) (2009), Docent (2007),Head of the Department of Foreign Languages
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
References
1. Sternin, I.A. (2012), “Identification of hidden meanings of the text and linguistic expertise”, Ponimaniye v kommunikatsii: Chelovek v informatsionnom prostranstve [Understanding in communication: A person in the information space], vol. 2,Yaroslavl', Yaroslav. gos. ped. un-tim. K. D. Ushinskogo, RUS, pp. 270–272.
2. Malyavina, L.A. (1985), U istokov yazykoznaniya Novogo vremeni (Universal'naya grammatika F. Sanchesa "Minerva" 1587 g.) [The dawn of New Age linguistics (a universal grammar by F. Sanctius "Minerva" 1587)], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
3. Kazenin, K.I. (2007), “Some constraints on ellipsis in Russian”, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 2, pp. 92–107.
4. Bibikhin, V.V. (2007), Yazyk filosofii [The Language of Philosophy], Nauka, SPb., RUS.
5. Barkhudarov, L.S. (1973), “To a question of a surface and deep structure of the sentence”, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 3, pp. 50–61.
6. Stepanenko, I.S., Ulianitckaia, L.A. and Shulzhenko, T.V. (2021), ”Towards the Question on the Zero Subject in English”, DISCOURSE, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 174–194. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32603/24128562-2021-7-5-174-194.
7. Finch, G. (2000), Linguistic Terms and Concepts, Palgrave Macmillan, NY, USA.
8. Chomsky, N. (2006), Language and mind, Cambridge Univ. Press Publ., NY, USA.
9. Kolesov, V.V. (2004), Yazykimental'nost' [Language and mentality], Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, SPb., RUS.
10. Shumkov, A. (2017), "Modeling Natural Language on Physical Concepts", 6th Intlernational Conf. on Meaning and Knowledge Representation, SPb., Russia, 5–7 July 2017, pp. 68–69.
11. Ulianitckaia, L.A. and Shumkov, A.A. (2018), "The physical base of communication on natural language", 2018 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Seminar (2018 ComSDS), SPb., Russia,11 Apr. 2018, pp. 72–75.
12. Szumkow, A.A. (2014), “Zur Präzisierung der Begriffs Semifinitivim Sinne Zweiteiligheit”, Metodichny ta psichologo-pedagogichny problem vikladannya inozemnikh mov na suchasnomu etapi: materialy VII naukovo-metodichnoy konferentsii s mizhnarodnoyu uchastiyu, KhNU imeni V.N. Karazina, Kharkiv, UA, pp. 154–156.
Review
For citations:
Ibragimova E.J., Shulzhenko T.V., Shumkov A.А. A New Approach to the Zero Subject in English. Discourse. 2022;8(6):175-195. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-6-175-195