Regional “sociology without sociologists” in the Middle Volga Region in the Soviet Period
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-6-57-71
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes circumstances of the emergence of regional sociology in the Soviet era. To describe this phenomenon, the author applies the concept of “sociology without sociology”. This idiom means scientific and sociological activity without the participation of the professional sociological community and describes this multivariate and non-linear process. The author also describes the reasons of existence of “sociology without sociologists” in Soviet and then in Russian social sciences.
Methodology and sources. The category “sociology without sociologists”, used by R. Ahlberg, N. Werth, and J. Matthes describes the abnormal state of science. In addition, the author uses the concept of “public sociology” by M. Burawoy to determine the vectors of evolution of Soviet and Russian regional sociology. The main research method is the analysis of documentary sources of the Soviet era. Also new, previously unexplored archival documents have been introduced into scientific circulation.
Results and discussion. The studied issue is examined on the ground of mass surveys of the state of religiosity of the population, which were initiated and carried out by the party bodies of the Tatarstan ASSR and Kuybishev area in 1964–1966. The results of those amateurish surveys served as a foundation for the development of sociology in the region. The article shows that throughout the existence of the “legal” regional sociology, in parallel with it, there were various forms of “sociology without sociologists”. The specificity of the Soviet period was that the existence of “sociology without sociologists” met the expectations of some CSPU circles, responsible for ideology tasks.
Conclusion. The application of the category "sociology without sociologists" is of great importance for the implementation of the demarcation of scientific and non-scientific forms of social knowledge.
About the Author
M. V. Kildeev
Republican Center for Youth, Innovative and Preventive Programs “Navigator”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mansour V. Kildeev – Can. Sci. (Sociology) (2002), Sociologist
36 Adoratsky str., Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420137
References
1. . Mikhailov, V. and Perevedentsev, V. (1967), “Great expectations”, Literaturnaya gazeta, no. 24, 14 June 1967, available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/perevedencev/stati/014.pdf (accessed 31.08.2022).
2. Matthes, J. (1973), “Soziologie ohne Soziologen? Zur Lage des Soziologiestudiums in der Bundesrepublik”, Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg. 2, Heft 1, Januar 1973, S. 47–58.
3. Ahlberg, R. (1989), “Die Rehabilitierung der Soziologie in der Sowjetunion: Der SoziologieBeschluß des Politbüros und seine Bedeutung”, Osteuropa, vol. 39, no. 5, S. 478–496.
4. Werth, N. (1992), “Revolution in Soviet Sociology: The Birth of Opinion Polls”, Sotsiologiya kak predmet spetsial'nogo nauchnogo issledovaniya: sbornik statei [Sociology as a subject of special scientific research: collection of articles], IS RAN, Moscow, RUS, pp. 99–111.
5. K obshchestvu svobodnomu ot religii [On the way to a society free from religion] (1970), Kurochkin, P. K. (ed.), Moscow, Mysl', USSR.
6. Sotsial'noe i natsional'noe. Opyt etnosotsiologicheskikh issledovanii po materialam Tatarskoi ASSR [The Social and the National. Experience of ethno-sociological research based on the materials of the Tatar ASSR] (1973), Arutyunyan, Yu.V. (ed.), Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
7. Baltanov, R.G. (1973), Sotsiologicheskie problemy v sisteme nauchno-ateisticheskogo vospitaniya [Sociological problems in the system of scientific and atheistic education], Kazan un-t, Kazan, USSR.
8. Kudryashov, G.E. (1974), Dinamika polisinkreticheskoi religioznosti [Dynamics of poly-syncretic religiosity], Chuvashskoe kn. izd-vo, Cheboksary, USSR.
9. Firsov, B.M. (2012), Istoriya sovetskoi sotsiologii: 1950–1980-e gody. Ocherki [The History of Soviet Sociology: 1950th–1980th: Essays], 2nd ed., SPb., EUPRESS, RUS.
10. Sotsiologicheskaya nauka i sotsiologicheskoe obrazovanie v Respublike Bashkortostan [Sociological science and sociological education in the Republic of Bashkortostan] (2002), Gilyazitdinov, J.M. (ed.), Bashkir. gos. un-t, Ufa, RUS.
11. Burawoy, M. (2009), Can “Public Sociology” travel as far as Russia?, Laboratorium, no. 1, pp. 197–204.
12. Akhmetova, S.A. (2012), “Empirical heritage of sociology in the republic of Tatarstan: a view from present to the past”, Vestnik KGTU im. A.N. Tupoleva, no. 3, pp. 184–187.
13. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RGASPI), coll. 606, aids 1, fol. 40.
14. Kalaganov, A., Svetlov, P. and Saifutdinov, Sh. (1967), Na puti k ateizmu [On the way to atheism], Tatarskoe kn. izd-vo, Kazan, USSR.
15. “Information on the study of religiosity in the Menzelinsky district”, Tsentral'nyi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv istoriko-politicheskoi dokumentatsii Respubliki Tatarstan (TsGAIPD RT) [Central State Archive of Historical and Political Documentation of the Republic of Tatarstan(TsGAIPD RT)], coll. 8126, aids 1, fol. 28.
16. Samarskii oblastnoi gosudarstvennyi arkhiv sotsial'no-politicheskoi istorii (SOGASPI), coll. 848, aids 54, fol. 55, p. 1-7.
17. Konkretno-sotsiologicheskoe izuchenie sostoyaniya religioznosti i opyta ateisticheskogo vospitaniya [Concrete sociological study of the state of religiosity and the experience of atheistic education]. (1969), in Pantskhava, I.D. (ed.), Moscow Univ., Moscow, USSR.
18. Stenogrammy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Metodika i rezul'taty konkretnykh issledovanii religioznykh perezhitkov” [Transcripts of the scientific-practical conference "Methodology and results of specific studies of religious survivals"] (Moscow, 22.12.1964), RGASPI, coll. 606, aids 4. fol. 18, 19.
19. Hough, J.F. (1969), The Soviet Prefects: The Local Party Organs in Industrial Decision-making, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
20. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RGASPI), coll. 606, aids 1, fol. 514.
21. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RGASPI), coll. 606, aids 1, fol. 388.
22. Zyuzin, D. and Perevedentsev, V. (1969), “When will the specialist arrive? Once again about the training of sociologists”, Literaturnaya gazeta, no. 2, available at: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/perevedencev/stati/014.pdf (accessed 07.06.2022).
23. Tukumtsev, B.G. (2000), Ocherki istorii pervoi samarskoi sotsiologicheskoi laboratorii [Essays on the history of the first Samara sociological laboratory], Samara Univ., Samara, RUS.
24. Protokol 11-go plenuma Baumanskogo RK KPSS ot 16.09.1982 [Protocol of the 11th plenum of the Bauman RK CPSU], TsGAIPD RT, coll. 19, aids 45, fol. 907.
25. TsGAIPD RT, coll. 6064, aids 1, fol. 347. P. 1-4.
26. Yadov, V.A. (1987), Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: metodologiya, programma, metody [The Sociological Survey: Methodology, Program, Methods], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
27. Ivanov, V.N. (2014), Sotsiologiya v SSSR. Zapiski direktora instituta [Sociology in the USSR. Notes of the Institute Director], IPO “U Nikitskikh vorot”, Moscow, RUS.
28. Zborovskiy, G.E. (2013), “Public sociology in the region”, Izvestia of Ural Federal Univ. J. Ser. 1. Issues in Education, Science and Culture, no. 2, pp. 153–159.
29. Salagaev, A.L. (2006), “The Crisis of Provincial University Sociology and Prospects for the Development of Independent Research Centers”, Bezopasnost' cheloveka, obshchestva, prirody v usloviyakh globa-lizatsii kak fenomen nauki i praktiki. Devyatye Vavilovskie chteniya [Security of man, society, nature in the context of globalization as a phenomenon of science and practice. Ninth Vavilov Readings], MarGTU, Yoshkar-Ola, RUS, pp. 273–280.
Review
For citations:
Kildeev M.V. Regional “sociology without sociologists” in the Middle Volga Region in the Soviet Period. Discourse. 2022;8(6):57-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-6-57-71
Views:
279
Email this article 