Key Words as Markers of the Communicative Behavior of the Discursive Personality of the Nominee to the USA Presidency (Based on the Genre of Pre-Election Debates)
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-2-158-173
Abstract
Introduction. This paper presents an analysis of the language indicators of communicative behavior of US presidential candidates during election debates. The scientific novelty consists of determining the specifics of the characteristics of the communicative behavior of the discursive personality, which form the basis of the corresponding social type, which can be identified using the methods of linguistic analysis. The study of the discursive personality is reduced to a description of the types of its performative actions; identification of types of communicative tonality that characterize the manner of behavior of a discursive personality and make it recognizable; identification of axiological characteristics of the studied discursive personality. The relevance of the work lies in the study of the problematic aspects of the discursive personality, explaining the specifics of the models of communicative behavior in situations of political communication.
Methodology and sources. This study used the methods of corpus linguistics and the interpretative method of discourse analysis. The texts of the genre of election debates, which took place from 2000 to 2020, became the empirical basis of this study. The volume of the corpus of these texts amounted to more than 1.5 million words. A corpus method of keywords, which allows to identify unique tokens of pre-election speeches of each of the presidential candidates; a qualitative analysis method that explains typical communicative actions that representatives of the two ruling parties of the United States, were used to establish the characteristics of the communicative behavior of US presidential candidates.
Results and discussion. The results of a comparative study of the discursive personality of the US presidential candidate representatives of the Republican and Democratic parties are presented. The study of keywords showed typical tactics of communicative behavior of candidates for US presidential candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties. It is established that presidential candidates from both parties use prosecution tactics in election debates, Republicans are more likely to resort to direct accusation tactics accusations of violating pragmatic, instrumental values, Democrats prefer indirect accusation tactics, which are based on accusations of violation of moral norms and values by political opponents.
Conclusion. The discursive personality of the US presidential candidate reflects the variable socio-ideological component of political discourse, which is manifested in a specific set of speech strategies and tactics and language structures that implement them.
About the Authors
L. A. KochetovaRussian Federation
Larisa A. Kochetova – Dr. Sci. (Philology) (2013), Docent (2010), Professor at the Department of Foreign Languages
5F Professora Popova str., St Petersburg 197022
Ya. Yu. Demkina
Russian Federation
Yana Yu. Demkina – Postgraduate at the Department of Foreign Languages5F Professora Popova str., St Petersburg 197022
References
1. Makarov, M.L. (2003), Osnovy teorii diskursa [Fundamentals of the theory of discourse], Gnosis, Moscow, RUS.
2. Leontovich, O.A. (2011), Metody kommunikativnykh issledovanii [Methods of communication research], Gnosis, Moscow, RUS.
3. Cameron, D. (1998), “Dreaming the Dictionary: Keywords and corpus linguistics”, Key words: A J. of cultural materialism, no. 1, pp. 35–45.
4. Mautner, G. (2009), “Corpora and critical discourse analysis”, Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, in Baker, P. (ed.), Continuum, London, UK, pp. 32–46.
5. Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2018), “Missing evidence-based link? Towards qualitative and quantitative approaches in language studies”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 2, pp. 31–37.
6. Stubbs, M. and Gerbig, A. (1993), “Human and Inhuman Geography: on the computer-assisted analysis of long texts”, Data, Description, Discourse: Papers on the English Language in Honour of John McH Sinclair on his Sixtieth Birthday, in Hoye, M. (ed.), HarperCollins, London, UK, pp. 64–85.
7. Stubbs, M. (1997), “Whorf’s children: critical comments on critical discourse analysis”, Evolving Models of Language, in Ryan A., Wray A. (eds.), Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK, pp. 100–116.
8. Baker, P. (2006), Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis, Continuum, London, UK.
9. Partington, A. (2004), “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast”, Corpora and Discourse, in Partington, A., Morley, J. and Haarman, L. (eds.), Peter Lang, Bern, CHE, pp. 11–20.
10. Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (2015), Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.
11. Friginal, E. and Hardy, J. (2014), Corpus-based sociolinguistics: A Guide for Students, Routledge, London, NY, UK.
12. Ilyinova, E.Yu. and Kochetova, L.A. (2017), “Dynamics of process constituent representation of sports event in diachronic corpus”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 16, no. 2. pp. 47–57. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.2.5.
13. Kochetova, L.A. and Kononova, I.V. (2019), “A cognitive corpus approach to the study of construing values in advertising discourse”, Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, no. 2, pp. 65–74.
14. Ulyanova, U.A. and Petrochenko, L.A. (2017), “Key words in the text of the "Missing Manual": the problems of identification”, Science J. of Volgograd State Univ. Linguistics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 68–81, DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu2.2017.2.7.
15. Karasik, V.I. (2014), Yazykovoe proyavlenie lichnosti [Linguistic manifestation of personality], Paradigma, Volgograd, RUS.
16. Murzin, L.N. and Shtern, A.S. (1991), Tekst i ego vospriyatie [Text and its perception], Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, Sverdlovsk, 1991, RUS.
17. Voronina, I.E., Kretov, A.A. and Popova, I.V. (2010), “Algorithms of semantic proximity assessment based on the lexical environment of the keywords in a text”, Proceedings of Voronezh State Univ. Series: Systems Analysis and Information Technologies, no. 1, pp. 148–153.
18. Karaulov, Yu.N. (1992), Slovar' Pushkina i evolyutsiya russkoi yazykovoi sposobnosti [Pushkin's Dictionary and the Evolution of Russian Language Ability], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.
19. Scott, M. (1997), “PC analysis of key words – and key key words”, System, vol. 25, iss. 2, pp. 233–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00011-0.
20. Scott, M. (2015), WordSmith Tools Manual, Version 6, available at: http://lexically.net/downloads/version6/wordsmith6.pdf (accessed 02.02.2022).
21. Stubbs, M. (2010), “Three concepts of keywords”, Keyness in Texts: Corpus Linguistics Investigations, in Bondi, M. and Scott, M. (eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, NDL, pp. 21–42. DOI: https://doi.org/
22. 1075/scl.41.03stu.
23. “Donald Trump & Joe Biden 1-st Presidential Debate Transcript 2020”, Rev.com, 29.09.2020, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/ transcripts/donald-trump-joe-biden-1st-presidential-debate-transcript-2020 (accessed 12.02.2022).
24. “Presidential Debate at Case Western Reserve University and Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland”, The Commission on Presidential Debates, 29.09.2020, available at: https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/september-29-2020-debate-transcript (accessed 12.02.2022).
25. “Donald Trump & Joe Biden Final Presidential Debate Transcript 2020”, Rev.com, 22.10.2020, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-joe-biden-final-presidential-debate-transcript-2020 (accessed 12.02.2022).
26. “2008 First Presidential Debate: Barack Obama and John McCain”, Englishtips.org, 29.09.2008, available at: http://englishtips.org/1150804178-2008-first-presidential-debate-barack-obama-and.html (accessed 18.02.2022).
27. “The Second Presidential Debate”, The New York Times, 07.10.2008, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2008/president/debates/transcripts/second-presidential-debate.html (accessed 18.02.2022).
28. “The Third Presidential Debate”, The New York Times, 15.10.2008, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2008/president/debates/transcripts/third-presidential-debate.html (accessed 18.02.2022).
29. “Barack Obama & Mitt Romney 1-st Presidential Debate Transcript 2012”, Rev.com, 03.10.2012, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/barack-obama-vs-mitt-romney-1st-presidential-debate-transcript-2012 (accessed 15.02.2022).
30. “Barack Obama & Mitt Romney 2-nd Presidential Debate Transcript 2012”, Rev.com, 16.10.2012, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/barack-obama-vs-mitt-romney-2nd-presidential-debate-transcript-2012 (accessed 15.02.2022).
31. “President Barack Obama and former Gov. Mitt Romney, r-mass., participate in a candidates debate, Lynn university, Boca Raton, Florida”, The Commission on Presidential Debates, 22.10.2012, available at: https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/october-22-2012-the-third-obama-romney-presidential-debate (accessed 15.02.2022).
32. “Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton 1st Presidential Debate Transcript 2016”, Rev.com, 26.09.2016, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-1st-presidential-debate-2016 (accessed 17.02.2022).
33. “Hillary Clinton & Donald Trump 2-nd Presidential Debate Transcript 2016”, Rev.com, 09.10.2016, available at: https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton-2nd-presidential-debate-transcript-2016 (accessed 17.02.2022).
34. “Full transcript: Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump’s final presidential debate”, Vox.com, 20.10.2016, available at: https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/10/19/13336894/third-presidential-debate-live-transcript-clinton-trump (accessed 17.02.2022).
35. “The First Bush-Kerry Presidential Debate”, The Commission on Presidential Debates, 30.09.2004, available at: https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/september-30-2004-debate-transcript (accessed 17.02.2022).
36. “Poll: Bush, Kerry even in 2nd debate”, CNN, 09.10.2004, available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/09/snap.poll/index.html (accessed 17.02.2022).
37. “The Third Bush-Kerry Presidential Debate”, The Commission on Presidential Debates, 13.10.2004, available at: https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/october-13-2004-debate-transcript/ (accessed 17.02.2022).
38. “The Second Gore-Bush Presidential Debate”, The Commission on Presidential Debates, 29.09.2020, available at: https://www.debates.org/voter-education/debate-transcripts/october-11-2000-debate-transcript (accessed 19.02.2022).
39. “The 2000 Campaign: 2nd Presidential Debate Between Gov. Bush and Vice President Gore”, The New York Times, 12.10.2000, available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/12/us/2000-campaign-2nd-presidential-debate-between-gov-bush-vice-president-gore.html (accessed 19.02.2022).
40. “2000 Presidential Election of George W. Bush vs. Al Gore”, ThoughtCo, 23.05.2019, available at: https://www.thoughtco.com/2000-election-george-bush-al-gore-104624 (accessed 19.02.2022).
Review
For citations:
Kochetova L.A., Demkina Ya.Yu. Key Words as Markers of the Communicative Behavior of the Discursive Personality of the Nominee to the USA Presidency (Based on the Genre of Pre-Election Debates). Discourse. 2022;8(2):158-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-2-158-173