Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects of Silence: A Structural Model of Communication

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-3-20-35

Abstract

Introduction. This work examines the role of silence along the lines of the theoretical considerations suggested by L. Wittgenstein and M. Heidegger. It also focuses on the role of communicative silence in each of the six functions of language in the structural model of communication put forward by Roman Jacobson. Other important types of functions are considered.

Methodology and sources. Firstly, various philosophical and linguistic approaches towards the definition of silence are studied. Non-communicative silence, being outside the language domain, is differentiated from silence as part of communication, which is treated as a zero speech act in its own right. Finally, the paper analyzes the roles of communicative silence in the communicative model developed by Jacobson. Aesthetic function of silence is given special attention to. The poststructuralist view of silence is discussed.

Results and discussion. Silence, acting as a linguistic sign, could convey information in the referential function; it could express emotions and personal experiences while performing the emotive function. As far as the conative function is concerned, silence serves to exert direct pressure on the addressee. Regarding the phatic function, silence acts as a means of establishing or discontinuing communication. Poetic silence focuses on the message for its own sake and manifests itself in repeating elements, such as syntactic pauses of various lengths and in differing contexts. Aesthetic function of silence is studied in a broader sense and involves the implementation of the motif of silence or “quietness” in a work of art. Silence becomes an important tool to study the acoustic, rhythmical potential of prosaic and poetic texts. With regard to silence in the metalinguistic function, it focuses primarily on the code of communication, i. e. on the language and its structure. The view of silence in psychoanalytical practice is also taken into account.

Conclusion. The study of the phenomenon of silence allows to see a different number of functions it performs in situations when the speaker is either in a particular opposition to the speaker; or the situation is associated with a sense of respect, grief, humility. Silence could also accompany a number of emotive states, and perform a major role in prosaic and poetic texts when it stands out against the sounds that the main character hears around him allowing texts to bring out its acoustic properties. Psycho-analytical perspective allows to reveal more functions of silence.

About the Authors

N. F. Shcherbak
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Nina F. Shcherbak – Can. Sci. (Linguistics) (2015), MA in English language teaching (Lancaster, UK), Associate Professor at the Department of English Philology and Cultural Studies

7/9 University emb., St Petersburg, 199034



V. I. Potienko
Saint Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Valeriya I. Potienko – Postgraduate at the Department of English Philology and Cultural Studies

7/9 University emb., St Petersburg, 199034



References

1. Bakhtin, M.M. (1979), Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity], Iskusstvo, Moscow, USSR.

2. Bibikhin, V.V. (2015), Yazyk filosofii [Language of philosophy], Azbuka, SPb., RUS.

3. Bogdanov, K.A. (1997), Ocherki ob antropologii molchaniya. Homo Tacens [Essays on the anthropology of silence. Homo Tacens], RKhGI, SPb., RUS.

4. Heidegger, M. (2006), Bytie i vremya [Seit und Zeit], Transl. by Bibikhin, V.V, Nauka, SPB., RUS.

5. Heidegger, M. (1993), “What is philosophy?”, Voprosy filosofii [Question of philosophy], no. 8, pp. 113–123.

6. Wittgenstein, L. (2011), Logico-philosophical treatise, AST, Moscow, RUS.

7. Epstein, M.N. (2006), Slovo i molchanie. Metafizika russkoi literatury [Word and silence. Metaphysics of Russian Literature], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, RUS.

8. Arutyunova, N.D. (1994), “Silence: Contexts of Use”, Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Yazyk rechevykh deistviya [Logical Analysis of Language. Language of speech actions], Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 106–117.

9. Khomyakova, E.G. (2012), “Man in language as an object of linguistic analysis”, Yazyk cheloveka. Chelovek v yazyke [Human language. Man in language], in Zelenshchikov, A.V. and Khomyakova, E.G. (eds.), SPbSU, SPb., RUS, pp. 208–232.

10. Morozova, O.N. and Bazyleva, O.A. (2011), “Definition of the concept of communication in modern linguistics”, Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina [Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin], vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 204–211.

11. Kurzon, D. (1998), Discourse of Silence, John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.49.

12. Saville-Troike, M. (2006), “Silence: cultural aspects”, Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, in Brown, K. (ed.), Elsevier, Boston, USA, pp. 379–381.

13. Saville-Troike, M. (1982), The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, 2nd ed., Basil Blackswell, Cambridge, MA.

14. Saville-Troike, M. (1985), “The place of silence in an integrated theory of communication”, Perspectives on Silence, in Tannen, D. and Saville-Troike, M. (ed.), Ablex, Norwood, NJ, pp. 3–18.

15. Wilson, D. and Wharton, T. (2006), “Relevance and prosody”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 38, pp. 1559–1579.

16. Ephratt, M. (2011), “Linguistic, paralinguistic and extralinguistic speech and silence”, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 43, pp. 2286–2307.

17. Jakobson, R. (1975), “Linguistics and poetics”, Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv” [Structuralism: pros and cons], in Basin, E.Ya. and Polyakov, M.Ya. (eds.), Progress, Moscow, USSR, pp. 193–230.

18. “Traditional wedding vows” (2012), Dot Com Women, available at: http://www.dotcomwomen.com/weddings/traditional-wedding-vows-samples-for-your-ceremony/

19. / (accessed 02.05.2020).

20. Waugh, E. (2012), Brideshead Revisited, Back Bay books, Freehold, NJ.

21. Shakhovskii, V.I. (2008), Lingvisticheskaya teoriya emotsii [Linguistic theory of emotions], Gnozis, Moscow, RUS.

22. Woolf, V., To the Lighthouse, available at: http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100101.txt (accessed 02.05.2020).

23. Baker, S.J. (1955), “The theory of silences”, The Journal of General Psychology, vol. 53, pp. 145–167.

24. Kerouac, J. (1959), On the Road, Colonial Press, N.Y., USA.

25. Emel’yanova, O.V. (2012), “Semantic universal “friend or foe” in the linguistic picture of the world”, Yazyk cheloveka. Chelovek v yazyke [Human language. Man in language], in Zelenshchikov, A.V. and Khomyakova, E.G. (eds.), SPbSU, SPb., RUS., pp. 43–69.

26. Lotman, Yu.M. (2016), “Structure of a literary text”, Structure of the artistic text. Analysis of the poetic text, Azbuka, SPb., RUS, pp. 5–374.

27. Anderson, L., “Walking and falling”, YouTube, available at: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=GHFCdviF6zU (accessed 02.03.2020).

28. Tolochin, I.V. (2014), “Value judgment as a semantic basis of a poetic text”, Yazyk kak kul’turnyi kod natsii [Language as a cultural code of a nation], in Zelenshchikov, A.V. and Khomyakova, E.G. (eds.), SPbSU, SPb., RUS, pp. 195–206.

29. Winterson, J. (1996), Art and lies, Vintage Press, London, UK.

30. Veselovskii, A.N. (1989), “From introduction to historical poetics”, Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical poetics], Vysshaya shkola, Moscow, USSR, pp. 42–58.

31. Lacan, J. (1999), Seminary. Kniga 2. “Ya” v teorii Freida i v tekhnike psikhoanaliza [Seminars. Book 2. “I” in the theory of Freud and in the technique of psychoanalysis], Transl. by Chernoglazov, A.K., Gnosis, Moscow, RUS.

32. Derrida, J. (1999), “Bearer of truth”, O pochtovoi otkrytke ot Sokrata do Freida i ne tol’ko [About a postcard from Socrates to Freud and beyond], Transl. by Mikhalkovich, G.A., Sovremennyi literator, Minsk, Belarus, pp. 645–678.

33. Poe, E.A., The Purloined Letter, available at: http://xroads.virginia.edu/~Hyper/POE/ purloine.html (accessed 02.05.2020).


Review

For citations:


Shcherbak N.F., Potienko V.I. Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects of Silence: A Structural Model of Communication. Discourse. 2021;7(3):20-35. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-3-20-35

Views: 669


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)