Preview

Discourse

Advanced search

To the Use of Etymological Methods in the Research of the Origin of Slavs

https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-1-103-124

Abstract

Introduction. This article is written in the development of the theme of the application of linguistic methods to historical research, more specifically, to the research of the circumstances of the origin of the Slavic ethnic group. These circumstances have not yet been clarified to the extent excluding clashes of opinions, down to opinions opposite to each other. In particular, the range of supposed dates for the appearance of the Common Slavic language varies from the 3rd millennium BC to the middle of the 1st millennium AD. The article describes an attempt of restricting this range.

Methodology and sources. The main ethno-defining trait is a common language: the Old Russian lexeme ɪазыкъ meant both “ethnos” and “language”. Usually a common language is, according to O. N. Trubachev, the result of convergence of many originally different dialects. The search for the probable time of the Common Slavic language origin has been accomplished under the following assumption: the factor consolidating dialects into the Common Slavic language (“Slavic Koine”) were kinds of economic activities that spanned a number of tribal groups, including the group of speakers of the actual Proto-Slavic dialect that initiated these activities.

The type of this production can be tried to determine by the ancient original Slavic industrial terms. Then, assuming the possibility of migrations of Proto-Slavs from the territory where the Common Slavic language was formed, to the territory inhabited by foreign-speaking tribes, we have searched for the names of local flora and fauna borrowed in Slavic languages, as well as foreign-speaking place names; in the languages of ethnic groups currently living in the territory of the formation of the Common Slavic language, we must, accordingly, find traces of Slavic names of local flora and fauna, as well as toponyms, Slavic by origin.

Results and discussion. Examining Slavic vocabulary, we have found there: a) Common Slavic names of copper, lead and silver, i. e. metals that have been simultaneously found in Old Europe exclusively in the Balkan-Carpathian metallurgical province of the 4th millennium BC; b) the original Slavic terms related to mining and metallurgy; c) the original Slavic names of crops and a number of other plants native to the Eastern Mediterranean and neighboring areas, as well as the names of the agricultural inventory; d) Finno-Ugric borrowings of the names of Northern European fish and Finno-Ugric place names in the absence of German borrowings. In the languages of peoples living in the Eastern Mediterranean one can find zoonyms, phytonyms and place names with unclear etymology, which, upon closer examination, can be explained as borrowings from dialects of the Proto-Slavic language.

Conlcusion. The totality of the observed lexical data leads to the conclusion that the ancestral home of Slavs was localized in the Eastern Mediterranean. This data does not correspond to any of other Indo-European (IE) languages other than the Baltic languages, which suggests, in particular, that only Proto-Slavs and Proto-Balts were directly related to the Balkan-Carpathian Metallurgical Province of the 4th millennium BC and that the languages of the respective groups were being formed in the Balkans and the Eastern Mediterranean at that very time.

About the Author

G. M. Telezhko
Sole Proprietor
Russian Federation

Georgiy M. Telezhko – Can. Sci. (Engineering) (1997), Director of IP “Georgiy Mikhailovich Telezhko”. The author of 49 scientific publications. Areas of expertise: comparative linguistics, atmospheric physics, relativity theory

167-8 Fontanka riv. emb., St Petersburg 190121



References

1. Sedov, V.V. (1994), Ocherki po arkheologii slavyan [Essays on the archeology of the Slavs], IA RAN, Moscow, RUS.

2. Trubachev, O.N. (1982), “Linguistics and ethnogenesis of the Slavs. Ancient Slavs according to etymology and onomastics”, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 4, pp. 10–26.

3. Telezhko, G.M. (2020), “Ethnogenesis of the Slavs in the Eastern Mediterranean (according to linguistic data)”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 3 (71), available at: https://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/9087 (accessed 28.07.2020).

4. Sedov, V.V. (2002), Slavyane. Istoriko-arkheologicheskoe issledovanie [Slavs. Historical and archaeological research], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Moscow, RUS.

5. Trubachev, O.N. (2003), Etnogenez i kul'tura drevneishikh slavyan. Lingvisticheskie issledovaniya [Ethnogenesis and culture of the ancient Slavs. Linguistic research], Nauka, Moscow, RUS.

6. Otkupshchikov, Yu.V. (1989), “Balto-Slavic handicraft vocabulary (names of metals, metallurgy, blacksmithing)”, Slavyane: etnogenez i etnicheskaya istoriya [Slavs: ethnogenesis and ethnic history], in Gerd, A.S. and Lebedev, G.S. (ed.), Izd-vo LGU, Leningrad, USSR, pp. 44–52.

7. Vasmer, М. (1986), Russisches etymologisches Worterbuch, Transl. by Trubachev, O.N., in Larin, B.A. (ed.), in 4 vol., 2nd ed., Progress, Moscow, USSR, available at: http://etymolog.ruslang.ru/index.php?act=contents&book=vasmer (accessed 07.07.2020).

8. Wiktionary, available at: https://en.wiktionary.org (accessed 07.07.2020).

9. Trubachev, O.N. (2008), Trudy po etimologii: Slovo. Istoriya. Kul'tura [Works on etymology: Word. History. Culture], vol. 3, Rukopisnye pamyatniki Drevnei Rusi, Moscow, RUS.

10. “Indo-European etymology”, The Global Lexicostatistical Database, available at: http://starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/query.cgi?basename=\data\ie\piet&root=config&morpho=0 (accessed 07.07.2020).

11. Shaposhnikov, A.K. (2010), “Nestinarski igri – an experience of semiotic description”, Linguistique Balkanique, vol. XLIX, no. 1–2, pp. 143–149.

12. Vinogradov, V.V. (1978), “The main problems of studying the education and development of the Old Russian language”, Izbrannye trudy. Istoriya russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [Selected works. History of the Russian literary language], Nauka, Moscow, USSR, pp. 65–151.

13. Trubachev, O.N. (1999), “Silver”, Indoarica v Severnom Prichernomor'e [Indoarica in the Northern Black Sea Region], Nauka, Moscow, RUS, pp. 76–82.

14. Chernykh, E.N. (2013), Kul'tury nomadov v megastrukture Evraziiskogo mira: v 2 t. [Culture of nomads in the megastructure of the Eurasian world: in 2 volumes], vol. 1, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Moscow, RUS.

15. Telezhko, G.M. (2018), “The analysis of the names of copper in languages of different ethnoses”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 2 (48), available at: URL: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5508 (accessed 07.07.2020).

16. Chernykh, E.N. (2006), “Philosophy of metal”, V mire nauki [In the world of science], no. 7, pp. 62–65.

17. Harper, D., Online Etymology Dictionary, available at: https://www.etymonline.com/ (accessed 07.07.2020).

18. Ivanov, V.V. (1983), Istoriya slavyanskikh i balkanskikh nazvanii metallov [History of Slavic and Balkan names of metals], Nauka, Moscow, USSR.

19. Hennig, R. (1961), Nevedomye zemli [Terrae Incognitae], Transl. by Vol'fson, L.F. and Persits, R.Z., vol. 1, Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury, Moscow, USSR.

20. Dal’, V.I. (1865), “Tin”, Tolkovyi slovar' zhivago velikoruskago yazyka. Chast' 2. I–O [Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. Part 2. I–O], Tipografiya A. Semena, Moscow, p. 1249.

21. Kogan, L.E. and Lezov, C.V. (2009), “Akkadian language”, Yazyki mira: Semitskie yazyki. Akkadskii yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskie yazyki [Languages of the World: Semitic Languages. Akkadian language. Northwest Semitic languages], in Belova, A.G., Kogan, L.E., Lezov, S.V. and Romanova, O.I. (ed.), Academia, Moscow, RUS, pp. 113–177.

22. Filin, F.P (1962), Obrazovanie yazyka vostochnykh slavyan [Creation of the language of the Eastern Slavs], Izd. AN SSSR, Moscow, Leningrad, USSR.

23. Telezhko, G.M. (2018), “Criticism of the some supposed sources for Slavic agricultural vocabulary”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 1 (47), available at: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5445 (accessed 29.01.2020).

24. Telezhko, G.M. (2019), “On the Divergence of a Proto-Indo-European Velar Syllabic Nasal in Indo-European Languages”, DISCOURCE, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 114–122. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2019-5-5-114-122.

25. Napol'skikh, V.V. (2002), “Prehistory of the peoples of the Uralic language family”, Istoriya tatar s drevneishikh vremen v semi tomakh. T. 1. Narody stepnoi Evrazii v drevnosti [History of the Tatars from ancient times in seven volumes. Vol. 1. Peoples of the steppe Eurasia in antiquity], in Usmanov, M. and Khakimov, R. (ed.), Rukhiyat, Kazan’, RUS, pp. 195–203.

26. Telezhko, G.M. (2017), “Of etymology of names of some species of African fauna”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 9 (43), available at: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5132 (accessed 29.01.2020).

27. Telezhko, G. M. (2018), “Criticism of the “sea fish” argument in the problem of the Slavic localization”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 1 (47), available at: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5422 (accessed 29.01.2020).

28. Telezhko, G.M. (2018), “Analysis of names of gold in languages of different ethnoses”, Universum: filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, no. 4 (50), available at: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/5757 (accessed 29.01.2020).

29. Sreznevskii, I.I. (1902), Materialy dlya slovarya drevne-russkago yazyka po pis'mennym pamyatnikam. Tom 2. L–P [Materials for the dictionary of the Old Russian language on written monuments. Vol. 2. L–P], Tipografiya Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk, SPb, RUS.

30. Duridanov, I. (1976), Ezik"t na trakite [The language of the Thracians], Nauka i izkustvo, Sofia, Bulgaria.

31. Shmelev, D.N. (1961), “Borrowings from the Baltic Finnish languages in the old Russian written monuments”, Voprosy slavyanskogo yazykoznaniya [Questions of Slavic linguistics], iss. 5, Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow, USSR, pp. 191–199.

32. Shchukin, M.B. (1997), “The birth of the Slavs”, Stratum: struktury i katastrofy [Stratum: structures and catastrophes], Nestor, SPb., RUS, pp. 110–147.

33. “G”, Vocabvlarivm Latinorvssicvm Magnvm, available at: http://linguaeterna.com/vocabula/list.php?letter=G (accessed 27.01.2020).

34. Kogan, L.E. (2009), “Old Assyrian dialect”, Yazyki mira: Semitskie yazyki. Akkadskii yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskie yazyki [Languages of the World: Semitic Languages. Akkadian language. Northwest Semitic languages], in Belova, A.G., Kogan, L.E., Lezov, S.V. and Romanova, O.I. (ed.), Academia, Moscow, RUS, pp. 195–204.

35. Kogan, L.E. and Lezov, C.V. (2009), “Hebrew”, Yazyki mira: Semitskie yazyki. Akkadskii yazyk. Severozapadnosemitskie yazyki [Languages of the World: Semitic Languages. Akkadian language. Northwest Semitic languages], in Belova, A.G., Kogan, L.E., Lezov, S.V. and Romanova, O.I. (ed.), Aca-demia, Moscow, RUS, pp. 296–374.


Review

For citations:


Telezhko G.M. To the Use of Etymological Methods in the Research of the Origin of Slavs. Discourse. 2021;7(1):103-124. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2021-7-1-103-124

Views: 1346


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2412-8562 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7777 (Online)