THE METHODOLOGICAL SEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2017-0-5-10-16
Abstract
From the second half of the XX century history of philosophy has appeared in the very center of a number of vivid and vehement discussions of both methodological and disciplinary character. Scholars were primarily focused upon founding approaches to provide their field with the novel piece of knowledge. At the same time, historical studies in philosophy should have been demoted to the level of the sphere for specialists in case they fail to formulate such a research programme. The present paper considers the most illustrious projects in the field of history of philosophy in the past century. It also represents the results of analyses of various methodological approaches to rethinking the essence of historian of philosophy’s craft, considering the latter as the philosopher, investigator, and scholar. We also discuss such significant historical as philosophical approaches as comparativistics, the history of ideas, doxography, that allowed eminent scholars and authors of the XX century to reconsider the value and importance of the history of philosophy as an independent field of investigation.
References
1. Christensen D. E. Philosophy and Its History // The Review of Metaphysics. 1964. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 58-83.
2. Mautner T. Dictionary of Philosophy. London: Penguin Books, 2000. 641 p.
3. Popkin R. H. Philosophy and the History of Philosophy // The J. of Philosophy. 1985. Vol. 82, № 11. P. 625-632.
4. Morgan M. L. The Goals and Methods of the History of Philosophy // The Review of Metaphysics. 1987. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 717-732.
5. Schmitz K. L. The History of Philosophy as Actual Philosophy // The J. of Philosophy. 1988. Vol. 85, № 11. Р. 673-674.
6. Puntel L. B. The History of Philosophy in Contemporary Philosophy: The View from Germany // Topoi. 1991. № 10. P. 147-153.
7. Normore C. G. What Is To Be Done In The History of Philosophy // Topoi. 2006. № 25. P. 75-82.
8. Gueroult M. The History of Philosophy as a Philosophical Problem // The Monist. 1969. Vol. 53, № 4. P. 563-587.
9. Бофре Ж. Диалог с Хайдеггером. Кн. 1. Греческая философия / пер. с фр. В. Ю. Быстрова. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2007. 256 с.
10. Celenza C. S. What Counted as Philosophy in the Italian Renaissance? The History of Philosophy, the History of Science, and Styles of Life // Critical Inquiry. 2013. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 368.
11. Catana L. The Concept «System of Philosophy»: The Case of Jacob Brucker’s Historiography of Philosophy // History and Theory. 2005. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 367-401.
12. Longo M. A «Critical» History of Philosophy and the Early Enlightenment: Johann Jacob Brucker. In: Models of the History of Philosophy / eds. G. Piaia, G. Santinello. New York: Springer, 2011. P. 479-577.
13. Аристотель. Метафизика / пер. с др.-греч. А. В. Кубицкого. М.: Эксмо, 2006. 604 с.
14. Manasse E. M. The Philosophical Value of the History of Philosophy // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 1952. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 538-549.
15. Гегель Г. В. Ф. Лекции по истории философии. Т. 1 / пер. с нем. Б. Столпнера. СПб.: Наука, 2006. 256 с.
16. Masson-Oursel P. The History of Philosophy // The Monist. 1926. Vol. 36, № 3.
17. Masson-Oursel P. La Philosophie Comparée. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1931. 166 р.
18. Корнеев М. Я. У истоков концептуализации сравнительной философии: Поль Массон-Урсель // Хайдеггер и восточная философия: поиски взаимодополнительности культур. СПб., 2001. C. 279-285.
19. Raju R.T. Introduction to comparative philosophy. Lincoln, 1962. 364 p.
20. Колесников А. С. Философская компаративистика и диалог культур // Россия и Грузия: диалог и родство культур: материалы Международного симпозиума, Тбилиси, 3-6 сент. 2003 г. СПб., 2003. C. 185-205.
21. Корбен А. История исламской философии. М.: Прогресс-Традиции, 2010. 181 с.
22. Ayatullah Sayyid Muhammad Baqir As-Sadr. Our Philosophy- Falsafatuna. London, 1959. 267 p.
23. Элиаде М. Аспекты мифа / пер. с фр. В. П. Большакова. М.: Академ. проект, 2010. 251 с.
24. Фромм Э. Вы будете как боги / пер. с англ. Е. Рудневой и др. М.: АСТ, 2014. 413 с.
25. Эвола Ю. Учение о пробуждении. Очерк буддийской аскезы / пер. с итал. А. П. Шурбелева. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2016. 412 с.
26. Хаксли О. Вечная философия / пер. с англ. Е. Д. Сыромятниковой. М.: РЕФЛ-бук Ваклер, 1997. 330 с.
27. Павловский Р. В. К вопросу об отношении Аристотеля к Платону: проблема знания // Вестн. СПбГУ. Сер. «Философия и конфликтология». 2017. Т. 33, вып. 2. С. 207-216.
28. Taber J. Transformative philosophy. A Study of Sankara, Fichte and Heidegger. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1983. 190 p.
29. Nakamura Н. The Comparative History of Ideas. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, 1992. 325 p.
30. History of Philosophy Research Group, University of Copenhagen. URL: http://www.academia.edu /28617600/History_of_Philosophy_Research_Group_University_of_Copenhagen_fall_2016 (дата обращения: 15.06.2017).
31. Research Group: History of Philosophy. URL: https://www.southampton.ac.uk/philosophy/research /groups/history_of_philosophy.page#research_staff (дата обращения: 15.06.2017).
32. III International Congress of Greek Philosophy. URL: http://www.uco.es/sifg/noticias/documentos /2015-09-07-iii-congreso-internacional-filosofia-griega-segunda-circular-en.pdf (дата обращения: 15.06.2017).
33. Лавджой А. О. Великая цепь бытия / пер. с англ. В. Софронова-Антомони. М.: Дом интеллектуал, 2001. 372 с.
34. Catana L. Lovejoy's Readings of Bruno: Or How Nineteenth-Century History of Philosophy Was «Transformed» into the History of Ideas // J. of the History of Ideas. 2010. Vol. 71, № 1. P. 91-112.
35. Mash R. How Important for Philosophers is the History of Philosophy? // History and Theory. 1987. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 287-299.
36. Yolton J. W. Is There a History of Philosophy? Some Difficulties and Suggestions // Synthese. 1986. Vol. 67, № 1. P. 3-21.
37. Frede M. The History of Philosophy as a Discipline // The J. of Philosophy. 1988. № 85. P. 666-672.
38. Passmore J. The Idea of a History of Philosophy // History and Theory. 1965. Vol. 5. P. 1-32.
39. Force P. The Teeth of Time: Pierre Hadot on Meaning and Misunderstanding in the History of Ideas // History and Theory. 2011. Vol. 50, № 1. P. 20-40.
Review
For citations:
L'vov A.A. THE METHODOLOGICAL SEARCH IN CONTEMPORARY HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY. Discourse. 2017;(5):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2017-0-5-10-16
Views:
248
Email this article 