Representation of a Perceptual Event in an Interview with an Artist
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-4-160-175
Abstract
Introduction. The purpose of the research is to consider the linguistic actualization of the main characteristics of the artist's visual perception in the interview discourse. The relevance of the research is due to its inclusion in the context of modern anthropo-oriented study of cognition of the world by a creative person. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time the process of perception of the world by an English-speaking artist is studied as an event within the framework of a complex linguistic and cognitive approach, which allows to analyze its specificity to the fullest extent.
Methodology and sources. The methodological basis of the research was made up of the works of the linguists-cognitologists L.V. Laenko, I.Yu. Kolesov, psychologist V. A. Barabanshchikov who revealed distinctive characteristics of perceptual image and substantiated the expediency of perception as an event. The research material was interviews with English-speaking artists from the Internet versions of the newspapers devoted to the life and work of modern artists. The methods of lexico-semantic, frame, contextual and pragmalinguistic analysis were used.
Results and discussion. The article reveals the peculiarities of visual perception of the world by contemporary English-speaking artists, which are reflected in the discourse of the interview. The author reveals the multidimensionality of a subject of perception, different ways of its representation on the verbal level: as an observer-actor and as a “offscreen” observer. The paper shows the specificity of visual perception of the world by the artist as a perceptual event that possesses spatial and temporal coordinates and such significant characteristics as dynamism, motivation, focus and emotionality. The denotative situation of perception is actualized in English by personal pronouns, active-action predicates, perceptual predicates, existential constructions, phase verbs, and state change predicates. The important feature of the artist's creative perception of the world is the forming of the necessity of representation in his consciousness perceptive image by means of painterly signs. As a result of such representation the given perceptive image receives the further development and becomes the basis for creating an artistic image to be embodied in an art work.
Conclusion. In the interview with the artist there is a complex process of cognition of the world by the creative person, based on the perceptual event. Visual perception is represented by the artist as a directed activity, which is to learn and which requires certain efforts and motivation. As a result of the perceptual event that the artist experiences, an artistic image is formed that is actualized in the work of art.
About the Authors
T. I. PetukhovaRussian Federation
Tatiana I. Petukhova – Can. Sci. (Philology, 2007), Associate Professor at the Department of the English Language and Cultural Studies, Saint Petersburg State University.
7/9 University emb., St Petersburg 199034
A. O. Chupakhina
Russian Federation
Alexandra O. Chupakhina – Postgraduate (1st year) at the Department of Foreign Languages, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University.
5F Professor Popov str., St Petersburg 197022
References
1. Leont'ev, D.A. (1999), Psikhologiya smysla [Psychology of Meaning], Smysl, Moscow, RUS.
2. Rubinstein, S.L. (1999), Osnovy obshchei psikhologii [Fundamentals of general psychology], Piter, SPb., RUS.
3. Plato (1999), Philebus. State. Timaeus. Critias, Mysl', Мoscow, RUS.
4. Bychkov, V.V. (1984), Estetika Avreliya Avgustina [The Aesthetics of Aurelius Augustinus], Iskusstvo, Мoscow, USSR.
5. Leonardo da Vinci (1965), Anatomiya, zapisi i risunki [Anatomy, notes and drawings], Transl. by Kondrat'eva, M.V. and Podkopaeva, Z.B., Nauka, Moscow, USSR.
6. Bruner, Je. (1977), Beyond the information given, Transl. by Babitskii, K.I., Progress, Moscow, USSR.
7. Lakoff, G. (2004), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things What Categories Reveal about the Mind, Transl. by Shatunovskii, I.B., Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Мoscow, RUS.
8. Neisser, U. (1981), Cognition and Reality, Transl. by Luchkov, V.V., Progress, Мoscow, USSR.
9. Bernstein, N.A. (1966), Ocherki po fiziologii dvizhenii i aktivnosti [Essays on the physiology of movements and activity], Meditsina, Мoscow, USSR.
10. Zaporozhets, A.V., Venger, L.A., Zinchenko, V.P. and Ruzskaya, A.G. (1967), Vospriyatie i deistvie [Perception and Action], Prosveshcheniye, Мoscow, USSR.
11. Wartofsky, M. (1988), Models. Representations and Scientific Understanding, Transl., in Novik, B. and Sadovskii, V.N. (eds.), Progress, Moscow, USSR.
12. Matsumoto, D. (2003), Culture and Psychology, Transl. by Karmin, A.S., Piter, SPb., RUS.
13. Cole, M. (1997), Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline, In-t psikhologii RAN, Мoscow, RUS.
14. Bock, P.K. (1994), Handbook of Psychological Anthropology, Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut-London, USA.
15. Segall, M.H., Campbell, D.T. and Herskowitz, M.J. (1966), The influence of culture on visual perception, Bobs-Merrill, NY, USA.
16. Rezhabek, E.Ya. and Filatova, A.A. (2010), Kognitivnaya kul'turologiya [Cognitive culturology], Aleteiya, SPb., RUS.
17. Kubryakova, E.S. (2004), Yazyk i znanie. Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol' yazyka v poznanii mira. [Language and knowledge. On the way of obtaining knowledge about language: parts of speech from the cognitive point of view. The role of language in cognition of the world], Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Мoscow, RUS.
18. Kravchenko, A.V. (2004), Yazyk i vospriyatie: Kognitivnye aspekty yazykovoi kategorizatsii [Language and perception: Cognitive aspects of language categorization], Izd-vo Irkut. gos. un-ta, Irkutsk, RUS.
19. Bondarko, A.V. (2004), “To the Question of Perceptionality”, Sokrovennye smysly. Slovo. Tekst. Kul'tura: sb. st. v chest' N. D. Arutyunovoi [The hidden meanings: the Word. Text. Culture: Collected articles in honor of N.D. Arutyunova], Yu. D. Apresyan (ed.), Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, Мoscow, RUS, pp. 276–282.
20. Benveniste, E. (2002), Problemes de linguistique generale, Transl. by Karaulova, Yu.N., Murat, V.P., Barysheva, I.V. and Mel'nikova, I.N., Editorial URSS, Мoscow, RUS.
21. Laenko, L.V. (2004), “Perceptive indication as a nomination object”, Proceedings of Voronezh State Univ. Ser.: Philology. Journalism, no. 2, pp. 71–77.
22. Laenko, L.V. (2006), “Perception – consciousness – language: the problem of interrelation”, Proceedings of Voronezh State Univ. Ser.: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 1, pp. 5–15.
23. Verkhoturova, T.L. (2006), “Metacategory “observer” in scientific picture of the world”, Studia Linguistica Cognitiva. Iss. 1. Language and cognition: Methodological problems and perspectives, Gnozis, Мoscow, RUS, pp. 45–65.
24. Barabanshchikov, V.A. (2006), “Subject and object of perception”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–72.
25. Barabanshchikov, V.A. (2008), “Determination of the perceptual process (to the question of explaining the phenomena of perception)”, Methodology and history of psychology, vol. 3, iss. 1, pp. 117–127.
26. Kolesov, I.Yu. (2008), Problemy kontseptualizatsii i yazykovoi reprezentatsii zritel'nogo vospriyatiya (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo yazykov) [Problems of conceptualization and linguistic representation of visual perception (on the material of English and Russian)], BGPU, Barnaul, RUS.
27. Gayford, M. (2016), A Bigger Message: Conversations with David Hockney, Thames and Hudson Ltd., London, UK.
28. Mouly, F. (2022), “David Hockney Rediscovers Painting”, The New Yorker, 17.02.2022, available at: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/a-tour-of-david-hockneys-newest-painting-series (accessed 20.01.2023).
29. “Lucian Freud in conversation with Michael Auping” (2016), Bridgeman images, 18.08.2016, available at: https://www.bridgemanimages.com/fr/lucian-freud-michael-auping/14943 (accessed 20.01.2023).
30. MacRitchie, L. (2019), “Interview: Glenn Brown”, Art in America, 18.03.2019, available at: https://www.artnews.com/art-in-america/features/interview-glenn-brown-62784/ (accessed 22.02.2023).
31. Goff, M. (2014), “Interview with Glenn Brown”, ASX, 07.06.2014, available at: https://americansuburbx.com/2014/06/interview-interview-with-glenn-brown-2012.html (accessed 22.02.2023).
32. Cué, E. (2016), “Interview with Glenn Brown”, Alejundra de Argos, 04.05.2016, available at: https://www.alejandradeargos.com/index.php/en/all-articles/21-guests-with-art/559-interview-with-glenn-brown (accessed 22.02.2023).
33. “The Eye of the Painting: An Interview with Peter Doig” (2006), Border Crossings, June 2006, available at: https://bordercrossingsmag.com/article/the-eye-of-the-painting-an-interview-with-peter-doig (accessed 22.02.2023).
34. “Drawing Projects: Dryden Goodwin interview”, The Telegraph, 18.08.2011, available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-features/8706552/Drawing-Projects-Dryden-Goodwin-interview.html (accessed 22.02.2023).
Review
For citations:
Petukhova T.I., Chupakhina A.O. Representation of a Perceptual Event in an Interview with an Artist. Discourse. 2023;9(4):160-175. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-4-160-175