Resources of Civil Science and Sociology (on the Example the Design of the Social Food Map of Dagestan Youth in St Petersburg)
https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-91-108
Abstract
Introduction. This article examines the possibilities and limitations of applying the concept of civil science on the example of constructing a map of the location of the infrastructure to meet the national and religious needs of Dagestan youth living in St Petersburg.
Methodology and sources. In addition to the conceptual developments of foreign researchers of civil science (C.B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, T. Phillips, R. Bonney, K. Purdam, L. Richardson, K.L. Prudic, J.C. Oliver, B.V. Brown, E.C. Long, etc.), the article contains review of domestic publications (E.V. Bryzgalina, F. Arevalo Leon, A.G. Gazoyan, E.G. Grebenshchikova, V.N. Zheleznyak, E.V. Seryodkina, etc.). It is concluded that the review of domestic publications demonstrates the analytics of predominantly foreign research projects of civil science, while the most recent works are aimed at understanding the experience of Russian projects, including the difficulties of applying civil science in Russia. It also compiled an extensive overview of the directions of civil science projects in modern scientific research. Results and discussion. Data collection took place through the social network VKontakte based on a large Dagestan group focused on fellow landsmen living in St Petersburg. The result of the study is the compilation of a map of food outlets and the sale of halal products in St Petersburg, based on the opinion of Dagestan youth, the map includes 87 objects. Based on the benefits of the study, the acquired benefit for science, society and civil scientists is considered. In general, the attempt to create this map with the involvement of citizen science has allowed us to test the resources provided by citizen science for research purposes, thereby we have identified the advantages and disadvantages of the use of citizen science in sociology, contributing to the popularization of the use of citizen science in practical studies.
Conclusion. It is concluded that engaging citizen science is an effective way to explore urban spaces, since it tends to operate on a large scale, relying on spatially dispersed participants, but at the same time it has serious limitations, therefore, its application requires preliminary research. Since the main limitation of its application is the interest of civil scientists in the research itself.
About the Author
E. А. ShekeraRussian Federation
Ekaterina A. Shekera – applicant for the degree of Can. Sci. (Sociology)1/3 Smolnyi str., St Petersburg 191124
References
1. Cooper, C. (2016), Citizen Science: How Ordinary People are Changing the Face of Discovery, The Overlook Press, NY, USA.
2. Gogiberidze, G.M. (2009), Islamskii tolkovyi slovar' [Islamic explanatory dictionary], Feniks, Rostov n/D, RUS.
3. HalalGuide.me, available at: https://halalguide.me (accessed 12.02.2020).
4. Yalovkina, A. (2016), “Opaque Islam of St. Petersburg”, Kavpolit, available at: http://kavpolit.com/articles/neprozrachnyj_islam_peterburga-25953/ (accessed 12.02.2019).
5. Abakarov, R.I. and Adiev, A.Z. (2017), “Inter-confessional and intra-confessional relations, ethno-confessional situation in the Republic of Dagestan”, Sostoyanie mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii i etnokonfessional'naya situatsiya v sub"ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo okruga (vtoroe polugodie i itogi 2017 g.) [The state of interethnic relations and the ethno-confessional situation in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation of the North Caucasian Federal District (the second half of the year and the results of 2017)], in Astvatsaturova, M.A. (ed.), PGU, Moscow, Pyatigorsk, Stavropol, RUS, pp. 142–151.
6. Notman, O.V. and Bagirova A.P. (2020), “Social Mapping of Megalopolis Space: Micro-Districts as Places of Residence, Places of Labor and Places of Leisure Activities”, Sociological J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 124–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.7269.
7. “Citizen Science”, Oxford English Dictionary, available at: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/33513?redirectedFrom=citizen+science#eid316619123 (accessed 03.02.2021).
8. Purdam, K. and Richardson, L. (2017), “Citizen social science methods for social research”, The Univ. of Manchester, available at: https://www.socialsciences.manchester.ac.uk/socialstatistics/research/projects/citizen-social-science-methods-for-social-research/ (accessed 08.08.2019).
9. Cooper, C.B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T. and Bonney, R. (2017) “Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems”, Ecology and Society, vol. 12, iss. 2, art. 11. DOI:10.5751/ES-02197-120211.
10. “People-powered research”, Zooniverse, available at: https://www.zooniverse.org/ (accessed 05.10.2020).
11. Citizen Science Alliance, available at: citizensciencealliance.org (accessed 05.10.2020).
12. Documents, European Citizen Science Association, available at: https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/documents/ (accessed 05.10.2020).
13. Citizen Science Global Partnership, available at: http://citizenscienceglobal.org (accessed 24.08.2021).
14. Maksutova, A. (2018), “What is citizen science?”, Vserossiiskii Festival' nauki «Nauka 0+» [All-Russian Science Festival “Science 0+”], available at: http://www.festivalnauki.ru/statya/68366/grazhdanskaya-nauka (accessed 05.10.2019).
15. Hecker, S., Haklay, M., Bowser, A., Makuch, Z., Vogel, J. and Bonn, A. (2018), Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science. Society and Policy, UCL Press, London, UK.
16. Pelacho, M., Ruiz, G., Sanz, F., Tarancón, A. and Clemente-Gallardo, J. (2021), “Analysis of the evolution and collaboration networks of citizen science scientific publications”, Scientometrics, vol. 126, iss. 1, pp. 225–257. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03724-x.
17. Zagryadskaya, A. (2016), “Citizen science to help professionals”, Newtonew, available at: https://newtonew.com/science/citizen-science (accessed 05.10.2019).
18. “Greenpeace”, Recyclemap.ru, available at: https://recyclemap.ru/ (accessed 05.10.2019).
19. Grebenshchikova, E.G. (2019), “Public engagement in medicine: citizen science and government initiatives”, Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya [Scientific research], pp. 131–142. DOI: 10.31249/scis/2019.00.08.
20. Egerev, S.V. (2016), “From scisourcing of simple operations to the citizen science”, Sociology of science and technology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 74–85.
21. Egerev, S.V. and Zakharova, S.A. (2013), “Crowdsourcing in science”, Science Governance and Scientometrics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 175–186.
22. Argamakova, A.A. and Yashina, A.V. (2016), “Crowd science: social studies and social changes through the crowdsourcing techniques”, Values and Meanings, no. 5 (45), pp. 137–150.
23. Bryzgalina, E.V. (2020), “Citizen science as a phenomenon of digital culture: tasks of humanitarian reflection”, Intercultural, scientific and educational dialogues, pp. 20–35.
24. Volkova, A.V. (2019), “Potential of "civil science" in social and political development”, Social and political researches, no. 1, pp. 41–50. DOI: 10.24411/2658-428Х-2019-10337.
25. Zheleznyak, V.N. (2017), “Science without the academic credentials”, Bulletin of PNRPU. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law, no. 1, pp. 37–44. DOI: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2017.1.05.
26. Zhelesniak, V.N. and Seredkina, E.V. (2016), “Citizen science in the age of high technology”, Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya, no. 10, pp. 27–34.
27. Gazoyan, A.G. (2020), “Citizen science as an instrument of science communication: analysis of Russian practice”, NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 810–817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817.
28. Shevchenko, S.Yu. (2018), “Citizen science: are people distinguishable from bacteria?”, Epistemology & philosophy of science, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 171–183. DOI: 10.5840/eps201855115.
29. Arevalo Leon, F.E. (2020), “″Citizen Science″ using GIS technologies as a tool for public participation in the "smart city"”, Master's dissertation, Tomsk Polytechnic Univ., Томsк, RUS.
30. “Citizen science through the eyes of scientists: how volunteer work helps in scientific research” (2021), ITMO.NEWS, available at: https://news.itmo.ru/ru/news/10139/ (accessed 25.04.2021).
31. Lipetskaya, M. (2021), “Modern civil (volunteer) science: proposals for the start of politics in Russia”, Center for Strategic Research “North-West”, available at: https://csr-nw.ru/publications/ (accessed 18.08.2021).
32. Maslanov, E.V. and Dolmatov, A.V. (2019), “Citizen Science – Science as a Vocation”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, vol. 56, iss. 3, pp. 40–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956345.
33. Pirozhkova, S.V. (2018), “The principle of participation and contemporary mechanisms of producing knowledge in science”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, vol. 55, iss. 1, pp. 67–82. DOI: 10.5840/eps20185519.
34. Shuchalina, A.V. (2018), “Development of a system for voluntary collection of user data through messengers on the example of the task of determining the habitats of Sosnovsky's hogweed”, Bulletin of Syktyvkar University. Series 1: Mathematics. Mechanics. Informatics, iss. 4 (29), pp. 50–59.
35. Makhnach, A.V., Laktionova, A.I. and Postylyakova, Yu.V. (2019), “Citizen science in socio-psychological research”, Institute of psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and economic psychology, vol. 4, no. 4 (16), pp. 43–70.
36. Vlasov, V.V. and Sedykh, S.E. (2018), “The stars shine for them”, Science First Hand, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 6–15.
37. Vlasov, V., Voronina, E., Galyamova, M. and Sedykh, S. (2020), “Involving schoolchildren and students in environmental studies relevant for fundamental and applied science: foreign and Russian experience”, Researcher, no. 2 (30), pp. 12–20.
38. “Flora of Russia”, I Naturalist, available at: https://www.inaturalist.org/projects/flora-of-russia (accessed 25.04.2021).
39. Salkova, A. (2021), “Catching hedgehogs, eating berries: how to become a citizen scientist”, Gazeta.ru, available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/science/2021/06/12_a_13632614.shtml?updated (accessed 08.08.2021).
40. Science people, available at: https://citizen-science.ru/ (accessed 28.02.2021).
41. Experion, available at: https://experion.citizen-science.ru/ (accessed 22.08.2021).
42. Beautiful Petersburg, available at: http://krasimir.org (accessed 05.10.2020).
43. Tomsk. Story map, available at: https://www.kartatomsk.ru// (accessed 28.02.2021).
44. Shekera, E.A. (2019), “Possibilities and Limitations of the Application of Citizen Science Methods in the Study of Urbanized Territories (on the Example of Mapping Food Stations and the Sale of Halal Products in St. Petersburg)”, Youth of the XXI century: the image of the future, Scientific conf. XIII Kovalev Readings, St. Petersburg, RUS, November 14–16, 2019, pp. 121–122.
45. McCaffrey, R.E. (2005), “Using Citizen Science in Urban Bird Studies”, Urban Habitats, no. 3 (1), available at: http://www.urbanhabitats.org/v03n01/citizenscience_full.html (accessed 08.08.2019).
Review
For citations:
Shekera E.А. Resources of Civil Science and Sociology (on the Example the Design of the Social Food Map of Dagestan Youth in St Petersburg). Discourse. 2022;8(4):91-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-91-108