Internet Meme: Origin, Definition and Research Approaches

Introduction. The article analyzes various approaches to studying Internet memes as key elements of modern media communication. It highlights the need for a comprehensive description of memes, considering their continuous evolution.

Methodology and sources. The study is based on works in cognitive linguistics, philosophy, and media communications, focusing on the evolution and function of memes. The research employs an analytical review of literature on meme definition, typology, and roles in socio-cultural and online communication.

Results and discussion. Research in memetics and media communication emphasizes the importance of distinguishing “meme” from “Internet meme”, as the latter represents a polycode text within the broader concept of memes. Internet memes play a key role in reflecting linguistic and cultural changes but remain difficult to classify due to their variability. Effective study methods include digital, visual, and discourse analysis, along with construction grammar, to account for their multimodal nature. A significant research focus is the development of meme typologies based on their functions in political, advertising, scientific, and everyday discourse, as well as their continuously evolving formation trends."

Conclusion. The prospects for studying Internet memes include conceptualization of intertextuality and examining the mechanisms of meme reutilization. The rapid variability of the verbal and non-verbal components of Internet memes, the high frequency use of intertextual references and intentionally distorted lexical and grammatical structures make it relevant to study the functioning of intertext and the formation of productive models and language patterns in Internet memes.

1. Troshchenkova, E.V. (2023), “Reutilization of Old Memes in the Context of Fresh Newsbreaks”, Language. Communication. Society: Digital scientific j., no. 4 (4), pp. 31–42.

2. Dowkinz, R. (2013), The Selfish Gene, Transl. by Fomina, N., AST: CORPUS, Moscow, RUS.

3. Hofstadter, D.R. (1985), Metamagical Themas: Questing for the Essence of Mind and Pattern, Basic Books, NY, USA.

4. “The History of “Meme””, Merriem-Webster Dictionary, available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/meme-word-origins-history (accessed 12.10.2024).

5. Shifman, L. (2013), “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker”, J. of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, iss. 3, pp. 362–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013.

6. Blackmore, S. (1999), The meme machine, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.

7. Zinovieva, N.A. (2016), “Translation of socio-cultural codes in the creation of an information product: analysis of Internet memes”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Sociology) dissertation, SPbSU, SPb., RUS.

8. Dancygier, B. and Vandelanotte, L. (2017), “Internet memes as multimodal constructions”, Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 565–568. DOI: 10.1515/cog-2017-0074.

9. Kanashina, S.V. (2017), “What is an Internet Meme?”, Belgorod State Univ. Scientific bulletin. Humanities, no. 28 (277), iss. 36, pp. 84–90.

10. Kanashina, S.V. (2016), “Internet meme as a new type of polymodal discourse in Internet communication”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dis., MSLU, Moscow, RUS.

11. Kanashina, S.V. (2019), “Intertextuality as a text category in Internet meme”, Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, no. 7 (140), pp. 133–138.

12. Glazkova, E.A. (2020), “Meme as a Form of Representation of Reality”, Mass Media in a Multipolar World: Problems and Prospects, Proc. of the XIV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conf., Moscow, RUS, 12 Nov. 2020, pp. 221–226.

13. Shchurina, Yu.V. (2014), “Internet Memes: the Problem of Typology”, Cherepovets State Univ. Bulletin, no. 6 (59), pp. 85–89.

14. Izgarsheva, A.V. (2021), “Linguistic interpretation of the Internet meme”, Abstract of Can. Sci. (Philology) dissertation, Moscow State Regional Univ., Moscow, RUS.

15. Brodie, R. (2007), Virus of the Mind, Transl. by Afanas'eva, L.V., Pokolenie, Moscow, RUS.

16. Dennett, D. (1990), “Memes and the exploitation of imagination”, J. of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 127–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/430902.

17. Meneghetti, A. (2016), Оnторsiсоlоgiа е Меметiса, Transl. by Menegetti, A., Moscow, NF Antonio Menegetti, RUS.

18. Castaño Díaz, C. (2013), “Defining and characterizing the concept of Internet Meme”, CES Psicología, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 82–104.

19. Krongauz, M.A. (2012), “Internet Memes: an Experience in Deconstruction”, Nauka i zhizn’ [Science and life], no. 11, pp. 127–132.

20. Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak, D. (2016), “Intertekstualność współczesnej komunikacji internetowej. Intertekstualne odwołania wewnątrzgatunkowe w memach”, Poznańskie Spotkania Językoznawcze, iss. 32, pp. 57–73. DOI: 10.14746/psj.2016.32.5.

21. Oleshkova, A.M. (2017), “Internet Meme as a Means of Cultural Reproduction”, Society: Philosophy, History, Culture, no. 8, pp. 164–166. DOI: 10.24158/fik.2017.8.36.

22. Migranova, L.Sh. and Kromina, E.I. (2015), “Internet meme as a special means of communication”, Issues of Modern Philology and Problems of Language Teaching Methods: Proc. III Int. Scientific-Practical Conf., Bryansk, RUS, 5–7 Nov. 2015, pp. 239–243.

23. Wiggins, B.E. and Bowers, G.B. (2014), “Memes as genre: a structurational analysis of the memescape”, New Media & Society, vol. 17, iss. 11, pp. 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194.

24. Milner, R. (2015), “Memes are Dead. Long Live Memetics”, Culture Digitally, 27.10.2015, available at: https://culturedigitally.org/2015/10/01-memes-are-dead-long-live-memetics-by-ryan-m-milner/ (accessed 02.05.2024).

25. Rogozina, I.V. and Buhner, N.Yu. (2023), “Meme Discourse as an Object of Linguocognitive Modelling”, DISCOURSE, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 165–175. DOI: 10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-3-165-175.

26. Kvyat, A.G. (2013), “Media Meme as a Tool of Political PR: a Cognitive Approach”, Mediaskop, no. 1, available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/node/1254 (accessed 12.10.2024).

27. Zinovieva, N.A. (2015), “Impact of Memes on Internet Users: Typology of Internet-memes”, The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, no. 1, pp. 195–201.

28. Giorgi, G. (2022), “Methodological Directions for the Study of Memes”, Research on Advanced Research Methodologies for a Digital Society, Punziano, G. and Paoli, A.D. (eds.), Hershey, PA, IGI Global, pp. 627–663. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8473-6.ch036.

29. Dobrovol'skij, D.O. (2016), “Construction Grammar and phraseology“, Voprosy Jazykoznanija, no. 3, pp. 7–21. DOI: 10.31857/S0373658X0000999-7.

30. Dynel, M. (2016), “’I has seen Image Macros!” Advice Animals memes as visual-verbal jokes”, Int. J. of Communication, vol. 10, pp. 660–688.

31. Uvarova, E.A. (2023), “Intertextuality as a structural and compositional basis of the internet-meme”, Prepodavatel XXI vek. Russian Journal of Education, no. 1, part 2, pp. 371–382. DOI: 10.31862/2073-9613-2023-1-371-382.

32. Moskvin, V.P. (2011), Intertekstual'nost': ponyatiinyi apparat. Figury, zhanry, stili [Intertextuality: conceptual apparatus. Figures, genres, styles], 2nd ed., LIBROKOM, Moscow, RUS.